Search form

Lewd Advertising

7 posts / 0 new
Last post
Lewd Advertising

A few years ago I submitted a sketch on the AWN threads deemed "potentially offensive to kids" or some such thing by the AWN powers that be. (FYI- a sketch of a fully dressed Prez Bush holding a large bomb to his crotch.)

So, you can imagine my surprise when I see the ever so wholesome image of 3dGspot.com 's ad showing a woman putting what appears to be an orange dildo-like object in her mouth just about everytime I visit the forums these days. Apparently, thinly veiled allusions to blow jobs are A-OK for the little kiddies.

I shall remember that when the Valentine's Day sketch contest comes around.:D

Ciao!

Just checked out the 'spot site, and it looks to me like they're advertising a bit prematurely. They have more categories on their site with no models available than they do with models in them. Not to mention a whole section for motion capture with nothing in it.

I admire the initiative and effort to create a model repository site, but it'll be a while before I head back to check the offerings. The business plan seems to be outpacing the product.

Yeah, but 3dGspot paid hundreds or thousands of dollars to post their lewd image.

Boutros, did you consider bribing the forum moderators? No, you didn't, did you?

Money talks. Bull****(payment pending) walks.

Upon further consideration, the mods were possibly afraid of starting another heated political thread. After all, there are what-some-would-call-pornographic images in the Daily Sketch thread, including a boy masturbating in his pants, naked vaginas, and a bunch of naked or topless women.

Care to post a drawing of a full-frontal naked man to see if there's a double standard? ;)

Y'know Butros, how could it not remind me of the same thing. But being that my last (Maybe only?) forum scrap was about my perceived phallicism in a newbie's Flash ecard, I thought , Naah. Better keep my mouth shut lest I sound obsessed.

But that is one weird lookin' lolly....not to mention the obvious concept of the ad.

I suppose it's okay to objectify woman even if they are synthesized.
I also agree no caricatures of politicains should be allowed as they are dicks.

ummm, the name of the website is 3DGspot. Somewhere in there is a reference, to uh, things. The closest thing awn comes to is "yawn." :D As much as I despise censorship I'm sure awn wants to come off as a class act, or else they would call it, wow I just thought of a great dirty acronym, but it is truly offensive, and I want to keep my mediocre standing here. You get the picture tho.

Pushing the envelope

J. Lethargic your "mediocre standing" still holds as I have no idea what you're talking about. :confused:

Okay, Harvey and Graphite. I'll merge two offensive things together and see if I get zapped. The president having a taco (if ya know what I mean).

Attachment