TAIS! Logo
Toronto Animated Image Society
'Zine - Exerpts
Address
Home
About
News
Events
Contact
'Zine
Archive

Deuces Wild:
Wendy Tilby and Amanda Forbis on Animation as Filmmaking

by Barbara Whitmer

 

 

Alberta-born Wendy Tilby and Amanda Forbis met as students at the Emily Carr Institute of Art and Design in Vancouver fifteen years ago. Tilby was in her fourth year, and Forbis in her second year. They worked together briefly on Tilby's graduate film. They went their separate ways, and have come back together to create a dynamic duo of filmmakers, giving us the 1999 Cannes Palm d'Or winning and 1999 Academy Award' nominated "When the Day Breaks". Tilby was recently a juror for the 5th Annual Castelli Animati in Genzano Di Roma, Italy, Oct. 4-8, 2000. Wendy currently teaches at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

BW: Why did you decide to make independent animation instead of classical or feature animation?
WT: It was never really a choice. Studio animation requires a rigorous set of animation skills which neither of us have. And given that "When the Day Breaks" took four years to make, the idea of making a feature is totally daunting! We're both much more attracted to the small scale and independence of making shorts.

 

 

BW: What are you doing in Cambridge Mass?
AF: Wendy is a visiting animator in the Fine Arts department here at Harvard. I have been very busy dealing with family issues in this last year, but now that I'm back we hope to get a new project going.

BW: Is Derek Lamb (formerly of the NFB) still there?
WT: He still lives in Cambridge but no longer teaches though he will be visiting my class later this year.

BW: Turning to your films, why did you change from the paint on glass technique of "Tables of Content" and "Strings" to pencil and paint on photocopies in "When the Day Breaks"?
WT: I tried a number of things including pen and ink and collage under the camera but the complexities of the story demanded a technique with more control. Also, paint on glass is very solitary and the paint on paper animation enabled me to collaborate with Amanda.

BW: How do you feel about the success of "When the Day Breaks"? It's won a phenomenal amount of awards!
AF: The response to the film was extraordinary! I'm still getting used to it.
WT: There is always a fear when making a film that nobody's going to get it. The first festival we went to was Cannes. We had no expectations and so were completely shocked that it won! The feedback was very gratifying.
AF: Better than the prizes is the profoundly satisfying feeling of having the film resonate with people.

BW: What do you think resonated with people?
WT: Everyone has experienced trauma of some sort and this is a story about a pig and what happens when her life (or day ) is broken by such an event - in this case, the death of a chicken. Her first impulse is to run home and batten down the hatches. The city, which, at the beginning of the film, was happy and friendly -becomes dangerous and threatening to her and she feels alone and vulnerable. Ultimately, by way of the plumbing and circuitry of the city, she reconnects with her community and at the end, is a sadder but wiser pig.

BW: I was glad to see Pig reconnect in the end. My research in trauma shows something called secondary traumatization, where someone can witness a trauma, and experience the event as though it happened to them, as a secondary witness. If they don't feel through the pain of the trauma and reconnect in a trusting way, they'll keep recreating the trauma. I was glad to see Pig go through the feelings of withdrawal and isolation, and then reach out with hope. That was great.
AF: I read a quote somewhere that said that we only recognize our connections to other people through difficult and painful experiences. When you're happy isolation is not an issue, but when you're unhappy you seek connection with others and through that need you often find strength and along with that an empathy for others and the difficulties they face. Ruby's initial response is to try to deal with what she has seen by shutting out the world at large but instead she comes upon a different, larger view of herself in the world.
BW: That's quite a beautiful idea. To, in distress, have the courage and wherewithal to see beyond your pain to someone else's.
WT & AF: Thank you.

BW: To shift to another topic, what do you think of women in animation? There are so few, do you think it's an issue?
AF: I'm giving a keynote in Regina about women in film and I don't quite know what to say on the topic as I have only have my own rather limited experience. At the NFB, it is not an issue. The Film Board has a long history of being proactive and there have been marvelous films by women there. I can't address the studio situation and have been privileged to avoid it. Neither of us has set out to make films on women's issues.

WT: Someone once asked me why the character in "Tables of Content" was a man. He was inspired by people I had observed while working in a restaurant and the solitary diners were (alas) usually men. Had I gone against the stereotype and made the character a woman, the audience would likely have made quite different assumptions her - which is not what the film is about. The REAL reason, though, is that men are much easier to draw than women!

BW: Less bumps? (everyone laughs)
AF: In "When the Day Breaks" the characters are animals. We initially worked on the main character as a human female, trying to achieve an average person, but we just couldn't do it. There's a strong tradition of the "Everyman" in literature and particularly in animation, but there's no "Everywoman" counterpart.

BW: It's the madonna/whore duality stereotype.
AF: Exactly. Everything we did came across as bland or sexy, Olive Oyl or Jessica Rabbit. Turning our main character into a pig cut through the problem entirely. She was allowed to be female and piggish and not utterly defined by her sex.
BW: Interesting. Do you have any suggestions for independent filmmakers?
WT: We were lucky enough to make this film at the NFB and so did not have to struggle with fundraising or having a day job. That aside, you must be passionate about your ideas because this alone will sustain you when the going gets tough (and it always gets tough!). Another difficulty is that short films tend to be underappreciated. We need more venues where people can actually see them.

BW: I recently saw Michel Ocelet's "Princes and Princesses", a collection of short films compiled into feature length animation. What kind of venue do you see?
WT: Theatrical anothologies like the Spike 'N' Mike Show have helped to popularize animation.And television, of course. Like most filmmakers, I would really love to see shorts back in the theatres before features but the theatres, of course, prefer to run trailers and commercials.

BW: At a recent short film festival in Toronto, one of the directors from Europe said new media and cheaper technology are making it easier for people to make their own films.
WT: It must be true - at Annecy this year we saw a huge number of new films and many were made on the computer. However, it still costs time and money and if it's not a commissioned piece one must rely on grants - which are getting scarce.

BW: In the U.S. grants vary according to state.
AF: Yes, there are state specific grant programs. Animation is not for everyone. You have to be passionate and obsessive and willing to live with no financial security . I only wish that there was more support for independent film, because not every talented person out there is constitutionally inclined to go out and drum up funding.

BW: So what does the future hold for you?
WT: It will likely not be limited to animation. It may include making documentaries, painting, teaching. Variety is good.

BW: Thank you for your time.
WT &AF: Thank you.

 

 

All articles/Illustrations/animations are copyright by authors/artists and cannot be re-used without their consent. Opinions are of authors/artists and do not necessarily reflect those of TAIS.
Back

Home / About / News / Events / Contact / 'Zine / Archive
Webmaster
(c) 2000-2002 Toronto Animated Image Society.