If
you think all animated cartoon stars are sweet, innocent and pure,
you are not ready to experience Spike and Mike's 1999 Sick and Twisted
Festival of Animation, which is slowly wending its way around the
U.S. Animated cartoons, like other art forms, have evolved in many
different directions. While many are still as wholesome as Snow
White, there are others that conservative ministers might claim
are corrupting the youth of America.
This article includes a review, but is not intended to convince
anyone to see or avoid the current Spike and Mike program. Instead
this was written to educate and to explain this growing phenomena.
The focus will be on the programs of Craig "Spike" Decker
and the late Mike Gribble as they played a major role in the creation
of this strange film esthetic.


The crazy world of Craig "Spike" Decker and the late Mike Gribble. © Mellow Manor Productions.
Spike and Mike's Sick and Twisted film packages
have been coming to town since 1990, when they first advertised
"extra twisted films" at their Saturday midnight shows.
In 1991 they put together their first full length program of this
type of film and ran it as an evening event. Like it or not, sick
and twisted animation continues to grow in popularity. It has become
part of American popular culture along with the sick and twisted
TV shows Ren and Stimpy, Beavis and Butt-Head, and
South Park.
Spike and Mike were the first to really exploit the marketing potential
of these quirky films. They gave the animators a showcase and encouraged
the growth of the movement. Today Mellow Manor, the company they
founded, remains the leading exhibitor of this trend.
They have discovered most of the pivotal
films and filmmakers of the movement including Eric Fogel (Mutilator),
creator of MTV's Celebrity Death Match, and John R. Dilworth
(Dirty Birdy), creator of Courage the Cowardly Dog,
an animated series for the Cartoon Network.
In 1997 they exhibited the film that was later developed into the
TV series South Park. Spike and Mike's biggest discovery was Mike
Judge, the creator of Beavis and Butt-Head. They commissioned the
first two films that star these pathetic anti-heroes. They also
showed Judge's earlier work. Spike and Mike's biggest financial
mistake was giving up their rights to Beavis and Butt-Head without
getting a percentage of future profits.
The 1999 Sick And Twisted Program
I would write the show off as worthless junk
if it were not for the fact that some of it is genuinely funny.
While past shows contained relatively few works that I thought were
memorable, the new collection seems to be a deliberate attempt to
improve the quality of the program. There are several new types
of subjects to laugh at and several films exhibit professional production
standards.
Having previewed the latest Spike and Mike show, I can guarantee
that it contains something to offend almost every reader of this
publication. Not only is most of the humor in questionable taste,
many images in the collection are ugly. Some of the visuals are
truly sick looking and some of the jokes are really depraved.
While I was expecting the somewhat predictable gags about sex and
violence this year, I was not ready for several truly outrageous
moments. For example Tongue Twister by Sean Scott deals with the
childhood fears of having your tongue stick to a frozen pipe in
the winter. The work took me by surprise and I found what happens
in the film hilarious (caution: this is a really sick work).
Several works this year are somewhat sophisticated
and avoid the loud brash style of storytelling that has dominated
past shows. In Chicken Coup a rooster discovers that his pet fish
fathered what he thought was his off-spring. This isn't a great
work, but it did make me chuckle. Billy's Balloon, about balloons
getting their revenge, is another nice understated tale. It won
the grand prize for Best Short Film at Slamdance this year and was
selected to be shown in the official competition at the 1999 Cannes
Film Festival.
A quick glance at the titles in the program tells us a wide variety
of subject matter is covered. Among the titles are Die Hard in
Under Two Minutes, Bowlin' for Souls, Swing Sluts,
Radioactive Crotch Man, Forrest Dump, The Beckers:
Cannibalism and Your Teen, and Home, Honey, I'm Higher: What
You Should Know About Drugs. The film about a middle class son
developing a craving for human flesh, including his own, was an
unexpected treat and possibly the best work in the show. Unfortunately
the "naughty" parody of Forrest Gump (1994) was
a mindless pre-teen bathroom joke and the pro-drug movie was well
made but boring. Swing Sluts is a tribute to really stupid
valley girls. While I consider the film awful, I assume it will
be a hit with the intended audience.
Previous Spike and Mike programs have had
a somewhat juvenile heterosexual consciousness, so it came as a
surprise to see an inoffensive homosexual gag in one film. Even
more unusual is Legend of Raggot, an outrageous comedy about
a bored gay couple that devises a ludicrous plan for finding sexual
fulfillment. It was directed by Sean Scott who also animated Tongue
Twister. I suspect he is an emerging talent who will go on to
bigger and more outrageous projects. Students at San Francisco State used to complain
that the shows got boring quickly as there were too many cartoons
that were similar. One wrote in a term paper that the 1993 show
was, "essentially boring and redundant... the festival wore
thin, (I was) dissatisfied with the show when it ended." The
present program has enough variety and vitality to keep most fans
entertained from start to finish.
Part of the program's success comes from the films being extremely
short. Most are designed to deliver their punch lines as quickly
as possible using an economical amount of artistic talent. A dozen
works in the show are under three minutes in length and nothing
is over six minutes long. This results in a fast paced program.
Another strength of the new show is the expanded variety of subject
matter. This keeps the show moving forward. If one form of humor
doesn't amuse you, just wait a minute as the next film might very
well have you laughing.


The screening of Academy Award-winning Bunny and 1999 Cannes' Official Competition Selected Billy's Balloon proves that Spike & Mike isn't just shock. Courtesy of Mellow Manor Productions. © 1998 Blue Sky Studios and © Bit
In past years much of the artwork was amateurish
looking. It appears there was a conscious effort this year to select
better looking films for the show. Spike and Mike commissioned four
works in the current program and all have well designed titles and
graphics. It appears somebody within the company, who likes the
1950s modern design look, has worked with the animators to improve
their visual designs.
What Is The Appeal Of These Shows?
Since sick and twisted animation mainly appeals to a young audience,
I have been asking students for their opinions of the show for many
years. Several have commented on what motivated them to see it in
their term papers. One said, "People are drawn to the obscene,
the bizarre, the freak show. People like to test their tolerances...
it promises the wild and raunchy. These are cheap thrills - cheap
thrills are good thrills." Someone else said he was "curious
to see rare, hard to see work." He had heard the program had
a large cult following just as the Rocky Horror Picture Show
(1975) did a few years ago.
The desire to be shocked was important to many people. One person
explained that he wanted a change from his daily life and he wanted
to see something that he couldn't see on TV or at regular movie
houses. He expected to be shocked and offended. He said, "Being
shocked can be fun... the show is meant to be shocking, not cute
or sentimental."
Many students commented on how seeing a Spike
and Mike program was a unique experience. At theaters with high
ceilings giant beach balls, balloons and sometimes inflatable love
dolls are tossed into the crowd before the film begins. One student
wrote, "As I entered the theater I was greeted by nearly 700
laughing and screaming people bouncing and bumping giant beach balls
to and fro as though they were taken back to their childhood. This
was a fantastic sight." The Sick And Twisted Aesthetic
There are several other factors that have contributed to the show's
popularity. The program has always been advertised as "17 and
over only!" so it has attracted many under age kids. Spike
maintains security guards check IDs, but I have known many students
who were proud to have seen the show before they turned 17.
The party atmosphere also allows students to come to the theater
drunk (beer and wine is served in San Francisco at the Palace of
Fine Arts) or stoned. The most pathetic term paper I have read was
from a woman who saw a sick and twisted program. She wrote, "I
really wish I could give you concrete examples, but I slightly altered
my state of mind and now I can't remember some things."
I see similarities between this new animation movement and the
punk music that emerged in the late 1970s and `80s. Lack of artistic
training does not prevent the artists from finding an audience and
much of what is produced is disposable and quickly forgotten. Both
use strong, ugly images to express themselves. Both movements are
sometimes sarcastic and critical of mainstream society. Both make
their statements without regard to artistic talent.
One does not have to be enthusiastic about either punk music or
sick and twisted animation to be "cool" or part of the
scene. You simply have to be there. I attended several punk concerts
where there was little or no applause and it didn't seem to matter
to the performers. I do not recall a crowd ever demanding an encore.
At the film shows there is laughter, but not much applause for the
best films. Nobody seems to care about the other films. After the
shows students rarely show any excitement for their favorite films.
Many say they are not sure they will see the next annual program.
I am fascinated about the future of sick
and twisted animation. What will happen if the quality of the shows
continues to improve and they become popular with a more mainstream
audience? At present there is a max of really crude works and those
that are more sophisticated. Will raising the standards too much
ruin the slightly seedy or naughty feeling young people have about
attending these programs? The fascination with forbidden images
will continue to draw crowds no matter what happens, but will the
art form eventually become institutionalized like Mad Magazine/TV
or Saturday Night Live and draw similar audiences?
Sick And Twisted Trivia
1. The South Park children are known for their use of
obscene language. Some people mistakenly believe these kids were
the first animated stars to swear on TV. Who holds that dubious
honor?
2. Beavis and Butt-Head have really ugly behinds. They have exposed
themselves many times to MTV audiences. Some people mistakenly believe
they were the first animated stars to drop their pants in front
of their TV audience. Who holds this honor?
3. South Park is based on a short animated Christmas greeting
by Matt Stone and Trey Parker. In it Jesus and Santa Claus fight
to the death over the meaning of Christmas. It was made several
years before the TV show and unauthorized video copies have become
prized collectors items. What is the title of this work?
4. Spike and Mike commissioned the first films to star Beavis and
Butt-Head. What are their titles?
5. Spike and Mike's first sick and twisted show included an animated
Lenny Bruce classic made in San Francisco in 1968. What is the title
of the film and who made it?
6. Who was the first theatrical cartoon star to swear in his movies?
Answers:
1. Bart and Homer Simpson. Their favorite swear words are still
"hell" and "damn."
2. Bart Simpson.
3. The Spirit of Christmas.
4. Frog Baseball, 1992, and Peace, Love and Understanding,
1993.
5. Thank You Mask Man, produced by John Magnuson and directed
by Jeff Hale.
6. Flip the Frog, 1931-'33. He said "hell" and/or "damn"
in a few of his films.
Karl Cohen is President of ASIFA-San
Francisco. [7] His first book, Forbidden
Animation: Censored Cartoons and Blacklisted Animators, [8] is
published by McFarland Publishers. He also teaches animation history
at San Francisco State University.
Links:
[1] http://www.awn.com/imagepicker/image/3650
[2] http://www.awn.com/imagepicker/image/3651
[3] http://www.awn.com/imagepicker/image/3652
[4] http://www.awn.com/imagepicker/image/3653
[5] http://www.awn.com/imagepicker/image/3654
[6] http://www.awn.com/imagepicker/image/3655
[7] http://www.awn.com/asifa-sf/index.html
[8] http://www.awn.com/mag/issue2.11/2.11pages/2.11langer.html