Within the world of animation, most experimentation
occurs within short format productions, whether they be high budgeted
commercials, low budgeted independent shorts or something in between.
The growing number of short film festivals around the world attest
to the vitality of these works, but there are few other venues for
exhibition of them or even written reviews. As a result, distribution
tends to be difficult and irregular. On a regular basis, Animation
World Magazine will highlight some of the most interesting with
short descriptive overviews. Letter to an Agony Aunt, 6 min., directed by Phil Croxall,
the U.K. Info: S4C International, Parc Ty Glas; Llanishen, Cardiff,
Pays de Galles CF14 5DU, the U.K.; Tel.: ++44 1222 74 7444; Fax: ++44
1222 75 4444; Web: www.s4c.co.uk; [1] E-mail: s4c@s4c.co.uk [2]. Stanley, 7 min., directed by Suzie Templeton, the U.K. Info:
Royal College of Art Animation Department, Kensington Gore; London,
SW7 2EU, the U.K.; Tel.: ++44 171 590 4512; Fax: ++44 171 590 4510;
Web: www.rca.ac.ek; [3] E-mail: anim@rca.ac.uk [4]. Brother, 8 min., directed by Adam Benjamin Elliot, Australia.
Info: Adam Elliot Ply Ltd., Flat 2, 1/a Kingsley Street, Elwood, Victoria,
3184 Australia; Tel.: ++61 3 9525 6209; E-mailL adamelliot@bigpond.com [5]. Furniture Poetry, 5 min., 15 sec., directed by Paul Bush,
the U.K. Info: Ancient Mariner Productions Ltd.; 93 Lausanne Road,
London, SE15 2HY, the U.K.; Tel.: ++44 20 7635 7533; Fax: ++44 20
7635 7533. In/Dividu, 7 min., directed by Nicole Hewitt, Croatia. Info:
Zagreb Films, Vlaska 70, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; Tel.: ++385 1 46 13
689; Fax: ++385 1 45 57 068; Web: www.zagreb-film.hr; [6] E-mail: zagreb-film@zg.tel.hr [7]. The 2000 Annecy Animation Festival's competition for short fiction
films included animated works made with a wide range of techniques.
Among the most interesting to me were the numerous puppet, clay and
object animations. This month I will review five of these films. Letter to an Agony Aunt Such is the case with Letter to an Agony Aunt, a mixed media
film directed by Phil Croxall, which employs puppets, photos, pixilation
and live-action footage. The film is about a live-action woman who
responds to advice given by a newspaper columnist. She reads her letter
to the audience, which meanwhile sees a re-enactment of a situation
she found herself in because she followed the columnist's advice to
'act on one's feelings.' Her friendship with a man was strained when
he misread her gifts as a sign of romantic interest, when in fact
she just felt like thanking him for being such a great friend. The
situation is typical enough, but here's the twist: this male friend
is a small puppet. At first I wondered if the use of the puppet was an ill-conceived
attempt to symbolize this man in some manner. Much to my relief, I
quickly realized that, no, she is friends with an actual puppet --
a puppet that moves very little and really is a puppet, as opposed
to a small-animated man. In terms of the narrative, then, the woman
somewhat unusual, but her character is further enhanced by pixilation
of her movement. She is also animated through a series of photos of
her figure, which are used outside a small store set (that is, a model).
The animation techniques, objects used and narrative have a cohesiveness,
which makes the film feel well rounded and thoroughly developed. It
runs 6 minutes and contains English-language dialogue, having been
produced in Cardiff, Wales, by Harmchair Cinema.
So often, cel animation feels very 'invisible' in terms of technique.
Storytelling is foregrounded and the actual cels and paints themselves
become a means to this end. Part of the reason that 'traditional'
3D objects (such as puppets and clay) are increasingly of interest
to me is that I find that these works more often seem to employ the
animation technique -including the actual objects used to enhance
the storytelling.
Stanley Both characters are designed to be sweaty, greasy and-overall-rather
unpleasant to look at. The wood and brick backyard and dingy kitchen
sets in which the action takes place add to the visceral feel of the
film, as does the flecks of 'blood' that appear on the characters
and on the meat itself. It seems that the use of Beta SP for recording
the animation probably added to the grainy quality that seems to pervade
the environment in which the story takes place. Since the 7-minute
film contains no dialogue, the setting, puppets and animated movements
are all the more important to the development of the narrative.
From the Surrey Institute of Art and Design comes a first film
by director Suzie Templeton. It employs puppets and a few objects
-- in the form of fresh meat -- to tell the story of a man obsessed
with growing a gigantic cabbage and his maniacal wife, equally obsessed
with chopping animal flesh for dinner.
Brother At the Annecy festival, Brother won a special distinction
awarded for its humor and sensitivity. Elliot's talent in these films
is in creating a character that viewers like and can identify as 'real'
in a relatively short time, using strong dialogue that is expertly
delivered as voice-over narration by William McInnes. The simply designed
figures and minimal animated movement are strongly suggestive of childhood
experience, out of which the stories grow. The English-language narration,
though, is delivered objectively refusing to foreshadow the ups and
downs along the way. Neither happy nor sad tales, these films are
nonetheless very affecting. Elliot has developed a very distinctive
style in these three works and it will be interesting to see how his
future work develops.
A much more 'minimal' approach to both animation and design are
taken by Australian director Adam Benjamin Elliot, in Brother.
The 8-minute film completes a trilogy of clay animations telling very
personal stories inspired by members of the director's family; the
others are Uncle
(1997) and Cousin (1998). Like these two films, Brother
takes a loving and humorous, but very matter-of-fact look at the life
of its subject.
In/Dividu In a way, this section seems out of sync with the rest of the animation,
since it is framed so differently. Although it is a study of the materiality
of an object, its shots lack the environmental space of the other
studies. As a result, it has a very different look and feel. Of course,
this separation also is apparent because the objects are, of course,
inanimate, while the human body, though analyzed like an object, nonetheless
has a wholly different quality.
The final two films take similar objects (household objects) and
aim to explore form, but in completely different directions. In/Dividu,
a 7-minute work produced at Zagreb Film, and directed by English filmmaker
and multimedia artist Nicole Hewitt, is objective and analytical.
It studies the material composition of various things, which include
a common chair, a small office refrigerator and the human body. The
inanimate objects are torn to pieces and then strung on what appears
to be fishing line or another clear material. These pieces dance,
transform and disappear in a choreographed study. At one point, the
plastic line itself becomes woven into the shape of the chair, which
is then further manipulated. The human body is filmed in extreme close
and close shots, revealing the texture of skin and quick glimpses
of whole body parts.
Furniture Poetry While Furniture Poetry is non-narrative (like In/Dividu,
it lacks dialogue), it nonetheless has developed a kind of humor through
its animation. Not completely unlike squash and stretch in cel animation,
the metamorphosis of household objects in this film gives character
to the items depicted on screen. Computer software has automated the process of 2D cel animation,
so the 'perfection' of that look is relatively easily accomplished.
However, the short films in competition at the Annecy festival have
shown that there is not only a sustained (probably growing) interest
in traditional 3D techniques, but an increasing expertise in using
3D materials. A member of the selection committee told me that by
far the largest number of submissions were computer-animated, but
a decision was reached to assure a more equal representation of materials
and methods. I think this was a good decision. Happily, the festival
has shown that a range of animation techniques continue to be applied
successfully at all levels. Maureen Furniss, Ph.D. is Assistant Professor and Program Director
of Film Studies at Chapman University in Orange, California. She is
the founding editor of Animation Journal (John Libbey, 1998).
The final film, Furniture Poetry, works with household
objects again. Household noises on the soundtrack ground some of the
animations in a domestic space while other segments lack sound or
feature other types of noise. Uniting these sequences, though, is
a pleasant chime that occurs during the transitions, helping to create
a cohesive work.
Links:
[1] http://www.s4c.co.uk;
[2] mailto:s4c@s4c.co.uk
[3] http://www.rca.ac.ek;
[4] mailto:anim@rca.ac.uk
[5] mailto:adamelliot@bigpond.com
[6] http://www.zagreb-film.hr;
[7] mailto:zagreb-film@zg.tel.hr
[8] http://www.awn.com/files/stanley.mov
[9] http://www.awn.com/files/brother.mov
[10] http://www.awn.com/files/indiv.mov
[11] http://www.awn.com/files/furniture.mov