Search form

Claims Dismissed in Disney Pooh Case

In yet another chapter in the lengthy court case pitting Slesinger family against the Walt Disney Co. over WINNIE THE POOH licensing rights, a federal judge on March 27, 2007, dismissed three claims against Disney, reports THE LA TIMES.

However, U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper set aside nine other claims, pending the Slesinger's appeal of a related state court case.

"We're pleased with the court's decision," said Daniel Petrocelli, Disney's attorney.

However, Patricia Slesinger was quoted as saying, "The ruling allows our case to proceed."

In February, Cooper rejected an attempt by the Walt Disney Co. to strip rights to the Winnie the Pooh character from the estate of long-time Pooh licensee Stephen Slesinger.

New York literary agent Stephen Slesinger acquired the Pooh merchandising rights from author A.A. Milne in 1930. After Slesinger died, his widow struck a deal with Disney in 1961 to merchandise Pooh and his friends in exchange for royalties.

Cooper issued a written order on Feb. 15, 2007, granting the Slesingers' motion to dismiss the case, in which the granddaughters of Pooh author A.A. Milne and illustrator E.H. Shepard, sued to terminate the Slesingers' rights to the character and reassign them to Disney.

Disney was not a party to the case, but the company paid legal expenses for both women, according to Petrocelli.

Slesinger's heirs have been battling Disney in California state court over what they claim are billions in unpaid royalties from Pooh, which generated more than $6 billion in retail sales in 2005.

The Slesingers last month also filed a claim with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, seeking to cancel a number of trademarks they claim Disney illegally took out on Pooh.

Rick DeMott's picture

___________
Rick DeMott
Animation World Network
Director of Content
Creator of Rick's Flicks Picks

Tags