ANIMATION WORLD MAGAZINE - ISSUE 6.01 - APRIL 2001
![]()
Ooh! Dat Pimp!
After reading Chris Robinson's droll column "The Animation Pimp: U.S. Jobs and Canada" (Robinson, 5.12). I find myself deeply disappointed that this person is speaking on the behalf of Canadian animators. Please do not let this person speak on the behalf of actual working artists. He is not an artist and therefore should have no comment whatsoever on the state of U.S./Canadian animation relations. Chris should get out of actual working animation artists' business and write for some other industry where his idiot-rantings are appreciated.Please read this thread discussing the subject, and you will find comments from REAL animation artists.
I didn't whore my culture off on Canadians. The Canadian music artists you mentioned stayed for a time in America and had some success, but I believe they are Canadian through and through and are proud of their culture and country. I've no control over who chooses to come to my country to further their artistic ambitions. PBS is totally out of control. They've sent US$40 million to a Canadian company. This is American tax dollars and donations supporting foreign interests! It's wrong -- dead wrong -- in my humble opinion.
Thanks for your time,
TSBPeter Chung on Comics
To Peter Chung,
Overall "The State of Visual Narrative In Film And Comics" (Chung, 3.4) was a nice article, especially the debunking of the notion that film is a "passive" and literature a less passive art form. Nice argument. I wish you could have used more examples to explain your opinions, although you do offer us a list of favorites at the end. Some glaring omissions: Frank Miller's Dark Knight (I know it's a perennial darling among geeks, but a fine book nevertheless), Maus (excellent by any standards) and Hellboy (you can't accuse Mike Mignola of leaving out a sense of environment). How about Gilbert Hernandez's early Palomar stories (before his obsession with decadence got in the way of his storytelling)? Also, are you familiar with Scott Morse? (I like his lighter touch.) Maybe some of these examples get too much attention already, but certainly so does Hard Boiled. Just wondering if these were overlooked on purpose, or do you have a criteria that excludes them? Also where do children's picture books fall? Visual? Literary? How about books by Edward Gorey?Sincerely,
Chuck Rekow
Full-time animation fan; part-time comic fan
Charles,
Thanks for your interest in the article in AWN on comics and visual narrative. It's been a long time since I wrote that piece, so I'll try my best to answer your questions while remembering my mindset at the time I wrote it.Yes, most of the comics titles you mention are deliberate omissions because they fail, in my opinion, to use the medium to best advantage. I understand that others may use differing criteria to judge, so I have no quarrel with readers who find value in the works you mention.
Miller's Dark Knight, to me, falls into the trap of relying too much on the running interior monologue of the character, which comments on the action as it occurs. This is a prime example of the tendency, which I find so antithetical to good visual narrative. I wish Miller would simply allow the action to proceed without having to interject how we should be feeling about it. Especially annoying to me is his habit of scattering countless small text balloons, some containing a single word, all over his layouts. It's as if he wants to control the pace at which his words are read. This was equally a problem in his Elektra Assassin series. Also, it suffers too much from being a comic about other comics. I doubt that any reader who has not read a lot of Batman comics would find much of interest in it, since it's mostly a deconstruction of the Batman myth. Since I never bought into that myth, personally, I found Dark Knight unreadable. However, I did enjoy the first volumes of Sin City quite a bit more because of their self-sufficiency.
Hard Boiled, to me, is brilliantly realized precisely due to the absence of commentary. With images so rich in information and atmosphere, the reader is free to feel the story's intent for himself, which remains ambiguously open to interpretation. Also, Miller's witty and precise dialogue gains in power for being used so sparingly.
Maus was a big disappointment for someone who used to enjoy Art Spiegelman's underground work, such as I remember from Arcade magazine. The central symbolism was pretty simplistic, really on the level of Don Bluth's An American Tail. I found the lack of character definition and expressiveness to make it a frustrating read. Way too many scenes of talking heads. I'm sure it was a genuinely heartfelt effort on Spiegelman's part, but good intentions do not make good art.
Mignola is certainly a brilliant designer and technician, but I find his storytelling (Hellboy included) does not involve me emotionally. It seems he keeps a constant distance between his characters and the reader. He renders his people as if they were props, or elements of the background. They never seem to be breathing, living flesh. I'm somehow too aware of his need to show off his technique, which, granted, deserves showing off. But I've bought his books mostly to look at the nice pictures. They're actually better left not read; there's less there than meets the eye. Looking at his adaptation of Dracula (the Coppola film) revealed a great deal to me about the shortcomings of his work, and of comics in general.
I haven't read Hernandez or Scott Morse, but I've only so much time and money to spend on comics. The last good comic I've read is the first two volumes of Jodorowsky and Janjetov's Les Technoperes (I read French). Currently it is not available in English, much to the shame of the U.S. publishers. For a truly amazing comics experience, try The Tower by the Schuiten Brothers, which was put out by Dark Horse some years ago. And for plain good old comics storytelling by a true master craftsman, read some of the Lieutenant Blueberry albums by Jean "Moebius" Giraud. Doesn't matter if you don't care for Westerns -- personally, I hate cowboy stories. But once you start looking at the pictures, you'll be sucked into wanting to know what's going on. And that's as good a test of a comic's quality as any.
Peter Chung
Peter,
Thank you for your generous reply on the comic art form. I agree with most of your comments, although the defects you point out never kept me from enjoying the comics you discuss. I have to take issue with the Maus/American Tail comment. After being exposed to so many treatments of the Holocaust in literature and film, my brain had become desensitized. Spiegelman's flashback treatment helps ground the story in reality once again, and serves as a reminder that this didn't happen so long ago. There may have been other ways to pull this off, but I feel it earned its Pulitzer. (Yes, martyrdom is the quickest path to sainthood.)I will look for more of your commentaries in the future.
Good luck and thanks!
Chuck RekowThanks for Voice Over Info
This is a message for Kath Soucie, who wrote that great article "And I Get Paid!?!: The Life of a Voice Actor" (Soucie, 2.12) about voice-over work. I wanted to thank her and Animation World Magazine for putting together such an interesting story. I had been wondering what a job like this would be like, so I found your Website at a perfect time.Much appreciated,
Josie Say
![]()