What Makes a Hit a Hit?

Joe Strike tries to uncover the special something that turns an animated idea into a long-running, hit television series.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

Over at FOX, vp of corporate communications, Scott Grogin, backs up Clifton. “It’s the writing. If it isn’t on the page the voices can’t do anything with it. But more than that, it’s a show’s point of view.”

Lazzo also cites writing over design. “Did the look of South Park help it succeed? The cutout paper look helped, but I think the show would’ve succeeded in any number of styles — the writing and the idea were so fresh and original it would’ve stood out anyway. Beavis and Butt-Head hardly moved at all and the writing helped it stand out too.”

Lazzo adds that a show’s pedigree can make a big difference. “If an individual has a track record that is meaningful that certainly helps too. I’ll open Matt Groening or (The Family Guy’s) Seth MacFarlane or (King of the Hill’s) Mike Judge’s submission first.” Having a success under one’s belt carries weight with Grogin as well. “When somebody like Mike Judge comes in with Beavis and Butt-head’s track record, we’re going to listen. King of the Hill was more suitable to broadcast but still had his distinctive point of view.

“We’re not ready to announce anything yet,” Lazzo said, “But we’re talking to some people with broad backgrounds in cartooning and animation who’ve done prime-time before. We’re hoping to have their projects on the air next fall and in ‘05.”

Arthur, PBS’s longest running series is now in its eighth season and will see a ninth in 2005, with 115 regular episodes and two primetime specials already produced. “We’re not running out of stories,” boasts Elizabeth Coté, national senior publicist from Boston’s WGBH, the PBS affiliate that originates the series with CINAR. “It mirrors the lives of real kids, and there’ll always be stories about kids to tell.”

Coté credits a number of factors for the show’s long-running success. “Arthur is book-based – that’s the reason we started with it. Marc Brown created the characters over 25 years ago and wrote and illustrated many books starring them before we became involved. Marc is also the series’ creative producer, which definitely keeps its quality up.”

That quality has earned Arthur a Peabody Award as well as three Emmys for Best Animated Series. For years it was the top rated series for the 2-11 crowd and still hits the number two or three spot on occasion. The most impressive evidence of the show’s ongoing appeal however may be its upcoming spin-off series, Postcards from Buster. The new show (a 20-80% mix of animation and live action) follows Arthur’s rabbit friend across the U.S. as he sends video postcards back to his buddy, and gives the aardvark face time in a second PBS series. One two-part December Arthur episode serves as introduction to the Postcards, which premieres in 2004.

“Remember most animated series, like live-action, won’t get past 65 episodes,” according to Mary Bredin, director, acquisitions and programming and part of the worldwide programming strategy of Disney/ABC Cable Networks Group, “because that’s enough to strip it five days a week for 13 weeks, which is the standard U.S. season. Long-running series for Disney in Europe have been Sabrina, Recess and Rolie Polie Olie.

On occasion a project makes it through the door on solely on the strength of an artist’s vision, without a strong story or characters backing it up. “In cases like that your job as a development person job to help the artist find the story,” says Clifton. “Sometimes artists are writers and sometimes they’re just not. If that’s the case, you find someone to work with artist to give voice to the story they’re trying to tell: what is it tonally, who is this character, why do I like him or her, what is driving them and what is their world like?

“With writer-creators, once you know who these people are, the property can almost start drawing itself. Then because we have access to amazing artists in-house and in the overall animation community, you find somebody who you think can resonate with the writer; someone who first of all, can translate what this person is trying to get across. You also have to ask yourself if the chemistry is going to work, because at the end of the day these people have to like each other if they’re going to spend hour after hour creating a show together.”







Comments


I find it quite insulting that someone as intelligent as Ms. Clifton could claim that the cartoon could "draw itself" as long as there are good writers. That is the main problem with animation today! Too much dialog, no one taking advantage of the visual capabilities of the medium. Story is the key thing for a series, but story is not only about writing. So often, it is the board artists and directors who save the story from being a long string of boring dialog. I find this very disheartening, as I admire so many of these people, and their comments are more than a little distressing. Story, design, marketing, all of these things are important. However, I think that doing something different might just appeal to people. Something that has not been done before. I know no network would support that, at least not in primetime, but everyone has to have their dreams.
Danielle Heitmuller (not verified) | Mon, 12/01/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink
One other thing… The look of South Park does not prove a show’s character look like isn’t important. The overly graphic character design style of South Park is critical to the show’s success. Because of the extreme crudeness and mean spiritedness of certain characters, you have to have a less realistic character look in order to distance the audience. If that show’s characters looked like those from “Peanuts,” you would not perceive them the same way. You would find them more offensive and less humorous. You might not even like them at all. You have to hand it to Matt and Trey. Whether it was intended or not, they got it right. Ms. Clifton of Film Roman is also right. You need to find a visual style that properly supports the writing. It will make or break the property.
Doug Whaley (not verified) | Wed, 11/26/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink
One other thing… The look of South Park does not prove a show’s character look like isn’t important. The overly graphic character design style of South Park is critical to the show’s success. Because of the extreme crudeness and mean spiritedness of certain characters, you have to have a less realistic character look in order to distance the audience. If that show’s characters looked like those from “Peanuts,” you would not perceive them the same way. You would find them more offensive and less humorous. You might not even like them at all. You have to hand it to Matt and Trey. Whether it was intended or not, they got it right. Ms. Clifton of Film Roman is also right. You need to find a visual style that properly supports the writing. It will make or break the property.
Doug Whaley (not verified) | Wed, 11/26/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink
What makes a hit show? It isn’t one specific thing. To say that it is the “writing” is wrong. That’s only one facet. The real answer is that it’s a balance of everything. You can have a wonderfully written show, but if you’re aiming for primetime, and you have a property that looks like Saturday morning kid animation, it isn’t going to fly with adults. A too narrow of niche is just as big of problem as thinking that you can create a show that will appeal to everyone,. This was one of the fatal flaws of “God, the Devil, and Bob.” Another mistake is defining a show’s niche strictly by age and sex. To increase your odds, you need to understand the viewer. If you don’t know why a show like Power Rangers is such a success, and how it works psychologically on so many different levels, than your chance of creating a hit property is going to be a lot more dependent on luck. The more you understand the human psyche, empowerment, fear, and other psychological motivations that makes a viewer choose one show over another, the more you’ll increase your odds of success. One of the things that is problematic with shows like “Kid Notorious”is the property lacks viewer identification. How many people watching can identify with being a movie producer and the problems that creates? If you don’t know what the five types of audience identification are, again, your success is going to be based more on luck. To understand what makes a show a hit, look at the people who’ve created the most successful. When it comes to primetime animation, you’re talking about creators who had talents in both writing and art. The more diverse your knowledge, experience, and talents are, the stronger your core vision will be. And it doesn’t stop with just writing and animation. An understanding of acting, human motivation, marketing, entertainment production, again, do nothing but increase your odds of success. Another important element is to bring to the property that special something that is unique about you. How did Steve Hillenberg come up with an underwater cartoon character named Sponge Bob? It came from his love for and background in oceanography, something that was special and unique to him. One other thing I can’t emphasis enough. It takes an enormous amount of work. A great series can take years to develop because there are so many elements that you have to get right. You have to be an extremely driven, persistent, self-motivated individual who understands there is no quick and easy road to success.
Doug Whaley (not verified) | Tue, 11/25/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.