What an Animated Oscar Race?

Rick DeMott ponders the Oscar race -- who are the shoo-ins, who has a chance and who doesn't have a prayer.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

With two strong contenders for the third nomination, DreamWorks could defeat itself in having Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence and Shark Tale cancel each other out. Ghost in the Shell 2 images courtesy of Go Fish Pictures. Shark Tale © DreamWorks Pictures.

Like Disney, DreamWorks has the other lock with Shrek 2, but it also has two other very strong contenders in Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence and Shark Tale. The studio seems to be pushing Ghost in the Shell 2 and Shark Tale equally. The Japanese import has the critical acclaim and Shark Tale has the box office success. As for Ghost’s chances, critically acclaimed imports haven’t done that well at Oscar time. Other than Spirited Away, no other Japanese film has been nominated and only one other foreign film — Triplets of Belleville. Ghost in the Shell 2 is very anime, and though anime is popular with the youngsters, will Academy voters bite? As for Shark Tale, the tone and humor is very Shrek-like, so will voters want two of the same thing? Plus, only Disney has been able to pull off more than one nomination in the same year.

With that said, it’s up to the other studios to steal the final nomination from DreamWorks. Warner Bros. has two contenders with Clifford’s Really Big Movie and The Polar Express. Clifford’s looks like an entry only to make sure that the Animated Feature category will go in effect. (WB also had the foresight not to even enter Yu-Gi-Oh!: The Movie into the competition.)

So Warners is putting its marketing might behind The Polar Express. With big names like director Robert Zemeckis and star Tom Hanks attached, this film gets built in buzz that Ghost in the Shell 2 could only dream for. So there are a couple factors in play here. Buzz, box office and “performance capture.”

Buzz is good for the film and the source material is revered. In some circles, the film and Hanks are being talked about for award nominations in non-animated categories. However, it’s lackluster opening box office performance gives a few extra points in favor of Shark Tale, which also has big name stars creating buzz. So what it really comes down to is whether Academy members will be creeped out by the “performance capture.”

If The Polar Express creeps too many Academy members out, The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie could sneak in and make a stand for 2D animation. The Polar Express © 2004 Warner Bros. Ent. All rights reserved.

Critics ranging from the L.A. Times to CNN have already panned the film as a remake of The Night of the Living Dead. Another major factor is Zemeckis’ previous statements that the film isn’t animated. He makes it clear that he directed Hanks, who performed the roles. The producers are also pushing the film in the visual effects category. Considering that the WB felt to enter it in the animated category and extensive animation had to be done to bring the characters’ and non-human elements to life, Zemeckis’ words could come back to haunt him more than Death Becomes Her.

So with Ghost in the Shell 2, Shark Tale and The Polar Express having hurdles to overcome on their way to the final three, Paramount may sneak in and steal it away with The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie. I’m serious folks — think Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius. The Academy likes good films that are popular. Everybody loves SpongeBob. He could be the Helen Hunt of toondom, making a successful transition from TV to film. It would also be a safe nomination as well. The Academy went with Treasure Planet over Bill Plympton’s Mutant Aliens, Neutron over Waking Life and Brother Bear over Millennium Actress and Tokyo Godfather. Give them too many challenging or questionable choices and they may pick the simple sponge. Films like Spirit, which got nominated in 2003, represent the good-natured, traditional perception of what animation is supposed to be.







Comments


I want to send you an award for most helpful ientrnet writer.

Flossy (not verified) | Wed, 09/28/2011 - 23:40 | Permalink
Chris, Once again, I agree. However, we try our best to promote shorts with the Fresh from the Festival reviews and will begin next year with the magazine dedicating its Film issue to both features and shorts. As for this article, the point was to chronicle Oscar buzz at the moment. Sadly, because of the way the awards are now, the shorts receive slim to zero Oscar word until the nominees are announced. After Jan. 25th, this may be a better time to talk about animated shorts in regards to Oscar. I think there is an interesting follow-up piece here, regarding how the features category has affected the shorts category. Rick
Rick DeMott (not verified) | Wed, 11/17/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Rick, I certainly don't think its your fault as an individual, but AWN usually makes a point of being at, at least, Ottawa and Annecy. Your 'sister' company, Acme Filmworks produces short films and works with a lot of short film animators. AWN does the Best of the Festivals piece every so often. So...really..if anyone knows what's out there in the short world, it should be AWN. And I think it's AWN's responsibility to promote the short sector equally. The issue of the awards system is something completely different. Chris
Chris Robinson (not verified) | Wed, 11/17/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Chris, Agreed, I should have prefaced the piece with its focus on features. Due to the fact that I do not get a chance to attend festivals like yours I do not get to see all the best shorts of the year unless they come into the office. It’s quite a shame, because I agree that most features are usually pedestrian compared to the best shorts of the year. RYAN is one of my favorite films -- short, feature, animated or live-action -- that I’ve seen in years. Another sad dilemma is that due to the new features category the shorts get greatly overshadowed now. There’s no short list for the category anymore. Our tinier brethren get dwarfed, because the giants are what get seen and heard. So when writing an article on Oscar buzz is it my fault the shorts get short changed or is it the whole awards system? Luckily, members cannot vote for the animated shorts without having seen them all. So I hope that readers who have had a chance to see more of the shorts than I will post their thoughts. Rick
Rick DeMott (not verified) | Tue, 11/16/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Rick, So your idea of NOT neglecting the short competition is to toss them a one paragraph bone to chew on. It's a shame you couldnt have shown as much passion for the short category (despite the fact that its a watered down competition that lures maybe 1% of the animation being produced annually) as you have for the features -none of which hold up well alongside even the worst films on your short list. Chris Robinson
Chris Robinson (not verified) | Tue, 11/16/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.