What an Animated Oscar Race?

Rick DeMott ponders the Oscar race -- who are the shoo-ins, who has a chance and who doesn't have a prayer.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

The battle is set and it looks like the Oscar winner will either be Shrek 2 or The Incredibles. Shrek 2 © DreamWorks Pictures. The Incredibles © 2004 Disney Enterprises Inc./Pixar Animation Studios. All rights reserved.

The cherished 11 for the animated Oscar race have been announced. Now it’s time for us in the industry to debate the final three and eventual winner. So therefore, I say, let the discussion begin.

Pretty much anyone can look at the list and know that Shrek 2 and The Incredibles are shoo-ins. Up until the release of Pixar’s latest, the film to beat was Shrek 2, which boasts the impressive stat of being the third highest grossing film in U.S. box office history at more than $440 million. Globally the film ranks seventh, bringing in more than $883 million. Then you add in home entertainment sales and the giant green ogre of a film has piled into the coffers of Spielberg & Co. more than a billion dollars. One adds in merchandising and you start to get dizzy. So what does this all mean in the Oscar race? The Academy loves to reward a good film that succeeds.

That being said — The Incredibles fits the bill as well. The reviews have been stellar. The Wall Street Journal’s Joe Morgenstern said this is the picture to beat for best film of the year. Disney and Pixar are following the same feeling and are pushing the flick for best picture as well. Golden Globes may be a lock, but Oscar may be a building this film won’t be able to leap in a single bound. Remember, Toy Story 2 won the Globe for comedy, but got bubkis from the Academy, except the inevitable best song nomination (or previously known as an animated film’s consolation prize).

So the winner will most likely be one of these two films. The campaigning will begin once the nominations are announced and it will be a matter of marketing and voter perception. Outside organizations will launch ads claiming that Mr. Incredible doesn’t deserve to be called a superhero because he doesn’t bleed. Others will claim that Puss in Boots is a flip-flopper — one moment he wants to kill Shrek and the next he’s the big guy’s best friend. Nine states will pass laws banning ogre/human civil unions and others will use The Incredibles as proof towards tort reform. But I digress into the land of tongue-in-cheek.

I highly doubt the campaigns for Shrek 2 and The Incredibles will be as bitter and divisive as the U.S. presidential election, but I do foresee some bickering in regards to the wild card film. Can I call it the Nader nomination? The field is pretty wide open in terms of the film that will grab the third slot. And I’m sure whomever gets the nod will have people complaining why another film didn’t.

So let’s look at the contenders. Unlike last year when Jester Till came out of left field, there are no real surprises on the list. Blazeway and Pentamedia’s The Legend of Buddha and Maxmedia’s Sky Blue (also known as Wonderful Days) were already on the radar as 2004 releases. But has anyone seen them? Likewise, there aren’t any glaring omissions like last year’s decision by DreamWorks not to enter Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas into the running. The only omission of note is the absence of Samuel Goldwyn-released French 3D feature Kaena: The Prophecy, which was left off the list because off Academy rules regarding foreign films being entered by their country of origin.

So now let’s go by studios. First, the old school studio synonymous with animation — Disney — along with the new school studio synonymous with animation, Pixar, have The Incredibles as their best shot for the award. Disney’s other two contenders are Disney’s Teacher’s Pet and Home on the Range. Both films have little hope of making the final three. Both were released in the beginning of the year with little fanfare, despite being generally well received by people who saw them. With the mega-push behind The Incredibles, these films will be left behind in superhero dust.

Yet, wouldn’t it be nice if Home on the Range did get a nod. A farewell salute to original 2D animation at Disney. We can wish upon a star can’t we?







Comments


I want to send you an award for most helpful ientrnet writer.

Flossy (not verified) | Wed, 09/28/2011 - 23:40 | Permalink
Chris, Once again, I agree. However, we try our best to promote shorts with the Fresh from the Festival reviews and will begin next year with the magazine dedicating its Film issue to both features and shorts. As for this article, the point was to chronicle Oscar buzz at the moment. Sadly, because of the way the awards are now, the shorts receive slim to zero Oscar word until the nominees are announced. After Jan. 25th, this may be a better time to talk about animated shorts in regards to Oscar. I think there is an interesting follow-up piece here, regarding how the features category has affected the shorts category. Rick
Rick DeMott (not verified) | Wed, 11/17/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Rick, I certainly don't think its your fault as an individual, but AWN usually makes a point of being at, at least, Ottawa and Annecy. Your 'sister' company, Acme Filmworks produces short films and works with a lot of short film animators. AWN does the Best of the Festivals piece every so often. So...really..if anyone knows what's out there in the short world, it should be AWN. And I think it's AWN's responsibility to promote the short sector equally. The issue of the awards system is something completely different. Chris
Chris Robinson (not verified) | Wed, 11/17/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Chris, Agreed, I should have prefaced the piece with its focus on features. Due to the fact that I do not get a chance to attend festivals like yours I do not get to see all the best shorts of the year unless they come into the office. It’s quite a shame, because I agree that most features are usually pedestrian compared to the best shorts of the year. RYAN is one of my favorite films -- short, feature, animated or live-action -- that I’ve seen in years. Another sad dilemma is that due to the new features category the shorts get greatly overshadowed now. There’s no short list for the category anymore. Our tinier brethren get dwarfed, because the giants are what get seen and heard. So when writing an article on Oscar buzz is it my fault the shorts get short changed or is it the whole awards system? Luckily, members cannot vote for the animated shorts without having seen them all. So I hope that readers who have had a chance to see more of the shorts than I will post their thoughts. Rick
Rick DeMott (not verified) | Tue, 11/16/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Rick, So your idea of NOT neglecting the short competition is to toss them a one paragraph bone to chew on. It's a shame you couldnt have shown as much passion for the short category (despite the fact that its a watered down competition that lures maybe 1% of the animation being produced annually) as you have for the features -none of which hold up well alongside even the worst films on your short list. Chris Robinson
Chris Robinson (not verified) | Tue, 11/16/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.