Inspired 3D: Lip-Sync and Facial Animation — Part 2
A quick analysis will show that you go from one mouth shape that is quite open (Ah in hafta) to a pretty closed one (the F in hafta) and then back open again (for the end of hafta). The result is the mouth popping from open to closed back to open in just three frames.
Oftentimes, beginners will make a phoneme that is an exact copy of ones face saying that single letter. So, to make E phonemes, you would say E by itself. To model K phonemes, you can base it off your own face in a mirror saying kuh. At first this seems logical. The problem is that when you say the t sound by itself (tuh), your face doesnt look at all like it would if you said skate. And that t in skate gives a face shape that is completely different from the t sound shapes in pet store. And THAT t is very different from the t shape you make when you say goatee. Figure 11 shows variations on the t shape.




As such, its imperative to remember that mouth shapes for sounds must be animated in context. The preceding sound shape affects the current sound shape. Likewise, the following sound shape is anticipated in the current sound shape.
So, the shapes shown must all be in context with the shape/ sound that precedes it and follows it. If you get stuck on the idea of making all the t sounds in a sound-track the same shape, regardless of the prior or following sound/ shape context in the dialogue, then youre setting yourself up for a popping mouth when you go to view your animation. Animating speech is not animating letters; its animating the flow of shapes that are needed to make the sounds.
If you can get the major impressions across in your animation, you can let the little stuff slide. Just like the impressionist would hint at a cluster of leaves with a single daub of his brush, you too should let words and sound shapes slur into the next word or sound shape. Mix the target facial weights together to show a flow. Get away from showing leaves and start showing contrast and form. Talking is more of a flowing thought than an alliterative function of letters.
Looking again at the example phrase, you hafta get, a more impressionistic interpretation would be to emphasize the following major accents:
Ooo
aaFF
Eh
Go ahead and say that out loud. Ooo as in scoop, aaFF as in after, and Eh as in pet.
It sounds a lot like you hafta get, doesnt it?
Now go one further. Grab a handheld mirror and say you hafta get. Watch how your mouth looks as you say it again. Now, say ooo- aaFF- eh a few times. See how very close the two are in how they look? Here is another example of this same principle: Say to your mirror, I love you. Then say to it, elephant shoes. The two look similar, dont they? Heres a breakdown of a few specific choices.
Youll want to start by letting the yuh of you flow into the more open aa at the beginning of hafta. Skip the specific ooo at the end of you, because it is not very strong. Its there, but it gets said while the mouth is transitioning into the beginning of hafta. Basically, it slurs into the next word. The h of hafta is buried in the back of the throat, so the lips dont really need to show it.
Picking up from the moderately strong aa of hafta, hit the f for two frames to let it read. Its the major closed point of the phrase, so that needs to line up and read clearly. Then skip the ending ah of hafta altogether, as well as the g of get. Both happen under the breath; theyre slurred under the transition from ff to the eh accent of get. Hit that last open pose of eh. Then end with an appropriately shaped nearly closed mouth to catch the idea of a t. Youve basically now animated Ooo-aaFF-Eht. And you know what? It flows, it feels natural, and it doesnt pop.
Ooo- aaFF- Eh.























Post new comment