Spirit: A Longshot Or A Sure Bet?

J. Paul Peszko looks at the risks that DreamWorks conquered by bringing Spirit to the screen.

"We are usually given a list of names, of possibilities of whom might work with that particular role," Cook discloses. "And we just go ahead and listen one by one to each one of those voices to see who can best facilitate that character."

Asbury agrees, "Really, it's a matter of holding that character design up and listening to what voice should be coming out of that character. It takes a lot of trial and error and a lot of listening to takes from other characters in other films to finally reach that point."

While Robert Redford was mentioned at one point as being in line for narration, the team chose Damon because, "When we met him and talked to him he is Spirit," Cook says. "He's got so much vitality and youthful quality to his voice. It was that voice quality we were going for."

"We spent four years trying to find the perfect voice that could capture a spirited, heroic character," said Katzenberg. "Matt had everything we hoped for, a genuine enthusiasm for life that comes through melodically in his voice."

But don't feel sorry for Bryan Adams. He was chosen to write the lyrics and perform the soundtrack album over names like Bruce Springsteen and Paul Simon. He is teamed with veteran scorer Hans Zimmer, who did the score for The Lion King and The Prince of Egypt among a host of other features. It is very possible that the album may draw an even older audience to the feature and enhance subsequent video sales, not to mention grabbing some gold or platinum on its own.

A Different Point of View
The other point of contention is the political correctness of the story, where Native Americans are nearly deified while the cavalry, railroads and westward expansion in general are vilified. But in the early versions of the story, the differences were not so pronounced.

According to Fusco, "This colonel is really Custer and was called Custer in my early drafts, and we portrayed the Washington River massacre. So, I wasn't trying to portray the Seventh Cavalry as good guys. Let's portray Custer and the Seventh as they were, and the Native American stuff I portrayed not so lily white. I spent a lot of time in the Lakota world. I speak the language and was adopted into a family there. So, I showed other characters [Native American] who were more brutal with the horses because that existed too. It was a real survival world, and I wanted to get all that stuff. There were more gray areas in the original. But as it found its way, it became what it wanted to be, and I'm not going to argue animation with Jeffrey [Katzenberg]. It's ultimately going to reach young people, and maybe light a fuse for them and get them interested in the West."

Sweeping Seemless Scope
On the technical side, this was the first animated feature for DreamWorks in Cinemascope. Making the most of the larger aspect ratio, the artists quickly adapted and took full advantage of the format.

"You know, very quickly into it, we realized it's all about picture making," Kelly Asbury notes, "and we have such a team of artists that we knew we wanted to take advantage of the big horizontal scope and thrust of it. Horses are natural for that, trains are natural for that, and the vast vistas are natural for that. So, what we thought to be a challenge in the beginning actually turned out to be an asset."

Another technical note, the animators used Maya software with a Linux platform. Why Linux and not Microsoft? "To dramatically reduce costs was one of the big motivating factors in moving animators to Linux," says head of technology Ed Leonard. "But, it is our animators' productivity that really counts. Telling the story well, not the underlying technology, is what matters to us. Microsoft software continues to play a key role in our overall business, but Linux is particularly well suited to animation production pipelines.''

Again DreamWorks' has pooled together the right formula. Just try to identify the points where 2D transitions into 3D and vice versa. You may be hard pressed, the blending is that good.

So, now all of the challenges have been met except one. Will Spirit's run to the box office make it all worthwhile? While the risks seem great, Jeffrey Katzenberg has proved time and time again that what counts is the story and emotional tie that the audience feels with the characters. After all the revisions and creative wrangling, the filmmakers have definitely brought Spirit to life.

J. Paul Peszko is a freelance writer and screenwriter living in Los Angeles. He writes feature articles, interviews and reviews for regional publications. He currently has two scripts under option and is working on a feature comedy, in addition to just completing his first novel. When he isn't writing, he teaches communications courses.









Comments


OH MY LIFE!!! Have you heard yourselves! OK it doesn’t have the best sound track in the world, it’s not the greatest storyline I’ve ever heard; but come on guys, this ain’t the worst movie you’ll ever see and if you care to remove your sinikle (not sure how to spell that) bloody blinkers for one moment, you’d see that in it was actually pretty good with the exception of the animation, which in places was astounding! Now I know that the general consensus is that animated movies are just for kids (I for one disagree), what’s wrong with not having a lip-synked horse and a horse that portrays its emotions through its movement; because I hate to tell all of you who don’t live in the countryside… Horses don’t damn well talk, they have an emotional language of their own! What’s wrong with doing something different, maybe something a bit more mature! And as for the chap who predicts the doomed end of 2D feature animation due to the current 3D fad (not that I don’t like some of it), let me tell you this: Quality 2D animation will never disappear just as long as there are people like me who will never abandon our drawing boards and are quite prepared to work towards a great feature while on the dole! Walt Disney, Ollie Johnston, Milt Kahl, Frank Thomas and company did not work for the best part of a century to discover this beautiful art only for it to be lost before our eyes.
Matthew Lee (not verified) | Tue, 04/29/2003 - 00:00 | Permalink
Spirit is a one in century animation, you just have to keep it up for the job well done.
elisha olaoluwa (not verified) | Thu, 04/17/2003 - 00:00 | Permalink
Spirit is the best movie what i am ever see
Pena Järvinen (not verified) | Wed, 04/09/2003 - 00:00 | Permalink
At last awn has begind the scenes of spirit. I am an animator and also wanted to know the secrets behind the making of this movie. I have watched this movie 14 times to watch the movements and the textures . Greate music too. What i`de ask to the people who read this is , is the softwares used in the making of this Successful MOvvie.
Shantanu Tonpe (not verified) | Mon, 03/03/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink
I love Spirit: it captured the dignity, the emotion, and the feelings of horses. In a way, Spirit becomes the spirit of all horses that people will come across after watching the movie. the songs were the feeling behind Spirit as he struggled through the world of humans. This movie is one of the best animated films i have seen.
Bridgitte Jones (not verified) | Mon, 01/27/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink
DreamWorks needs A LOT of work when it comes to their story department. I don't care if you have the nine old men animating the movie...if the story is weak then the movie as a whole will suffer. When you think about it, there is hardly a story to be told in Spirit. A horse gets caught, more than once, then wants to escape. Hmmmm. The only obstacles in his way are all physical; not emotional or intellectual. Spirit does nothing in the movie that shows us his inner self. It was the equivalent of watching someone jumping over hurdles in the Olympics. There's no suspense or real motivation to his actions. He just does things because he's written to do them. It doesn't have to be Shakespeare but DreamWorks should at least adhere to some of the classic storytelling principles. DreamWorks is so concerned with the aesthetics of a film that they forget about the story (with the exception of the 2 animated features not produced at the Glendale facility: Shrek and Chicken Run....coincidence? hmmmm). It's a shame that they have all that talent over there yet they can't seem to learn that reinventing the storytelling wheel doesn't work. Disney has created classic after classic because they focused on the story first then the animation second (I'm speaking of the films made mainly with Walt). Now Pixar is copying that same old method of storytelling. Their movies reflect it. Well told story with very appealing characters. DreamWorks could take a lesson or two from Pixar. I bet Pixar could tell a story with paper cutouts and make it more interesting than Spirit. Let's hope that they do something different with Sindbad. Oh wait. They're Katzenberg's DreamWorks. They already animated a lot of the poorly developed story...I've seen it.
Me (not verified) | Wed, 06/05/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Heard great things about the movie. I love to ride horses. can't wait to see it.
Bobby Stresney (not verified) | Tue, 06/04/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Its hard to say how "Spirit" will do. Considering that I haven't seen it yet, and I scared about how bad it might effect the animation world. Considering that Disney is closing their doors in five years to go completly 3D, the studios out there have to come up with a BETTER story. Come on, the horses dont talk, and thats what attracts the kids attention. "Shrek" was a great film, because of the story, and the characters. If studios continue to pump out films that dont have great storys, and characters we can attract to, then 2d animation for feature is doomed. Cheers!
Darryl (not verified) | Sat, 06/01/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
My hat is off to Dreamworks for taking another step in a new direction. Beautifully animated without trying to be to hip, and without innuendo, or undertones, or topical gag humor. Its a clean film, and beautiful, and as 3d steps overtakes this industry, its quite possibly the last of its kind.. If you need a break from all the fast cutting, digital/phasers/explosions, then give this simple film a try. I think you'll be quite impressed. As an audience member, you need to choose carefully what type of film you want to support. Especially at the dawn of this digital age, your movie ticket dollar really plays a roll in which films will be offered in the future.. So I ask that you NOT give any studio exec, reasons to someday greenlight a Scooby Doo IV, or a 'Bullwinkle Babies', or "Hunchback of 105 dalmations returns to Jungle never-never land III". If you want more originality, or experimentation in your feature animation choices, then support films like 'the Waking Life', or Nightmare before Christmas, or any of Myazaki's work. Support Pixar's brilliant story crew, and Aardman's originality, and Shrek. And if you dont know who Hogarth is, meet him and his metal man in "Iron Giant." Go to local festivals and support those independant animators, and they will blow you away with humor and content and creativity at levels that Hollywood just cant factor in their formula spreadsheets.. (I tell you there is some FANTASTIC talent out there..) Great films are original films. Please support creativity and craft,, not crap. Viva animation!
erik kuska (not verified) | Fri, 05/31/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Spirit sucks.....period.
Wendy Schulli (not verified) | Fri, 05/31/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.