Spirit: A Longshot Or A Sure Bet?

J. Paul Peszko looks at the risks that DreamWorks conquered by bringing Spirit to the screen.

In order to educate his animators, Katzenberg arranged for Sumida and Dr. Deb Bennett, another renowned horse expert, to serve as the film's consultants. Then DreamWorks purchased a Kiger mustang stallion named "Donner" to serve as the model for the horse, Spirit. Kiger mustangs are noteworthy because they are a wild breed with genetic traits that can be traced back to the breeds brought over by the Spaniards centuries ago.

This began an intensive crash course in equine anatomy, movement, locomotion and behavior at the Los Angeles Equestrian Center, a short drive from DreamWorks' animation campus. Here, the animators spent a great deal of time sketching and videotaping horses, particularly Donner.

"Horses are notoriously difficult to draw, and a lot of people know how they look and move, so it's obvious if you make a mistake," says Baxter. "There were times when someone would animate something that was a little too much like a dog. They would do a bit of action and it would look like a dog playing with something, not a horse."

The other nagging problem was giving the animated horse the power to perform the actions called for in the script such as leaping across a high canyon. "Trying to create some of the actions in the movie and give them enough power was tricky," Baxter states. So, the challenge became how to make the horse look realistic and at the same time animate it. "I tended to simplify and boil down his anatomy into component parts, which would be easily followed by a large group of people and make it so that everyone could draw him satisfactorily and move him around. It's not like we put every single muscle in there, but we had to understand the basics of where they all were."

Much easier said than done. In some cases there are only two or three lines delineating one body part from another. "True," Baxter says, "but you have to know what's there in order to put that line in the right place."

No Mr. Ed Here
Beyond the challenge of drawing horses accurately, the animators had to create a horse who could communicate with the audience through expressions and body language, since none of the animals in the film speak.

This is a point of contention if not controversy. The question is: did Katzenberg intend the horses to be silent from the outset as he claims, or did his team of animators only later realize that Katzenberg's epic Western was in danger of becoming a real joke?







Comments


OH MY LIFE!!! Have you heard yourselves! OK it doesn’t have the best sound track in the world, it’s not the greatest storyline I’ve ever heard; but come on guys, this ain’t the worst movie you’ll ever see and if you care to remove your sinikle (not sure how to spell that) bloody blinkers for one moment, you’d see that in it was actually pretty good with the exception of the animation, which in places was astounding! Now I know that the general consensus is that animated movies are just for kids (I for one disagree), what’s wrong with not having a lip-synked horse and a horse that portrays its emotions through its movement; because I hate to tell all of you who don’t live in the countryside… Horses don’t damn well talk, they have an emotional language of their own! What’s wrong with doing something different, maybe something a bit more mature! And as for the chap who predicts the doomed end of 2D feature animation due to the current 3D fad (not that I don’t like some of it), let me tell you this: Quality 2D animation will never disappear just as long as there are people like me who will never abandon our drawing boards and are quite prepared to work towards a great feature while on the dole! Walt Disney, Ollie Johnston, Milt Kahl, Frank Thomas and company did not work for the best part of a century to discover this beautiful art only for it to be lost before our eyes.
Matthew Lee (not verified) | Tue, 04/29/2003 - 00:00 | Permalink
Spirit is a one in century animation, you just have to keep it up for the job well done.
elisha olaoluwa (not verified) | Thu, 04/17/2003 - 00:00 | Permalink
Spirit is the best movie what i am ever see
Pena Järvinen (not verified) | Wed, 04/09/2003 - 00:00 | Permalink
At last awn has begind the scenes of spirit. I am an animator and also wanted to know the secrets behind the making of this movie. I have watched this movie 14 times to watch the movements and the textures . Greate music too. What i`de ask to the people who read this is , is the softwares used in the making of this Successful MOvvie.
Shantanu Tonpe (not verified) | Mon, 03/03/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink
I love Spirit: it captured the dignity, the emotion, and the feelings of horses. In a way, Spirit becomes the spirit of all horses that people will come across after watching the movie. the songs were the feeling behind Spirit as he struggled through the world of humans. This movie is one of the best animated films i have seen.
Bridgitte Jones (not verified) | Mon, 01/27/2003 - 01:00 | Permalink
DreamWorks needs A LOT of work when it comes to their story department. I don't care if you have the nine old men animating the movie...if the story is weak then the movie as a whole will suffer. When you think about it, there is hardly a story to be told in Spirit. A horse gets caught, more than once, then wants to escape. Hmmmm. The only obstacles in his way are all physical; not emotional or intellectual. Spirit does nothing in the movie that shows us his inner self. It was the equivalent of watching someone jumping over hurdles in the Olympics. There's no suspense or real motivation to his actions. He just does things because he's written to do them. It doesn't have to be Shakespeare but DreamWorks should at least adhere to some of the classic storytelling principles. DreamWorks is so concerned with the aesthetics of a film that they forget about the story (with the exception of the 2 animated features not produced at the Glendale facility: Shrek and Chicken Run....coincidence? hmmmm). It's a shame that they have all that talent over there yet they can't seem to learn that reinventing the storytelling wheel doesn't work. Disney has created classic after classic because they focused on the story first then the animation second (I'm speaking of the films made mainly with Walt). Now Pixar is copying that same old method of storytelling. Their movies reflect it. Well told story with very appealing characters. DreamWorks could take a lesson or two from Pixar. I bet Pixar could tell a story with paper cutouts and make it more interesting than Spirit. Let's hope that they do something different with Sindbad. Oh wait. They're Katzenberg's DreamWorks. They already animated a lot of the poorly developed story...I've seen it.
Me (not verified) | Wed, 06/05/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Heard great things about the movie. I love to ride horses. can't wait to see it.
Bobby Stresney (not verified) | Tue, 06/04/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Its hard to say how "Spirit" will do. Considering that I haven't seen it yet, and I scared about how bad it might effect the animation world. Considering that Disney is closing their doors in five years to go completly 3D, the studios out there have to come up with a BETTER story. Come on, the horses dont talk, and thats what attracts the kids attention. "Shrek" was a great film, because of the story, and the characters. If studios continue to pump out films that dont have great storys, and characters we can attract to, then 2d animation for feature is doomed. Cheers!
Darryl (not verified) | Sat, 06/01/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
My hat is off to Dreamworks for taking another step in a new direction. Beautifully animated without trying to be to hip, and without innuendo, or undertones, or topical gag humor. Its a clean film, and beautiful, and as 3d steps overtakes this industry, its quite possibly the last of its kind.. If you need a break from all the fast cutting, digital/phasers/explosions, then give this simple film a try. I think you'll be quite impressed. As an audience member, you need to choose carefully what type of film you want to support. Especially at the dawn of this digital age, your movie ticket dollar really plays a roll in which films will be offered in the future.. So I ask that you NOT give any studio exec, reasons to someday greenlight a Scooby Doo IV, or a 'Bullwinkle Babies', or "Hunchback of 105 dalmations returns to Jungle never-never land III". If you want more originality, or experimentation in your feature animation choices, then support films like 'the Waking Life', or Nightmare before Christmas, or any of Myazaki's work. Support Pixar's brilliant story crew, and Aardman's originality, and Shrek. And if you dont know who Hogarth is, meet him and his metal man in "Iron Giant." Go to local festivals and support those independant animators, and they will blow you away with humor and content and creativity at levels that Hollywood just cant factor in their formula spreadsheets.. (I tell you there is some FANTASTIC talent out there..) Great films are original films. Please support creativity and craft,, not crap. Viva animation!
erik kuska (not verified) | Fri, 05/31/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Spirit sucks.....period.
Wendy Schulli (not verified) | Fri, 05/31/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.