Spirit: A Longshot Or A Sure Bet?

J. Paul Peszko looks at the risks that DreamWorks conquered by bringing Spirit to the screen.

You have probably heard that joke about the definition of a camel. It is a horse that has been designed by committee. Since film is a collaborative art, most movies are put together by committee. This is even truer in feature animation, where you not only have a director but usually co-directors and a team of artists to design and animate each character. So, given the squabbling that goes on in a committee and the intrinsic problems with animating horses, one might have expected DreamWorks' Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron to turn out looking like a double-humped dromedary, but far from it. Magnificent in scope, this DreamWorks offering for the hectic Memorial Day weekend (May 25 - 27 in the U.S.) is an animated version of an epic Western that features nearly photo-realistic horses set amid panoramic vistas of the Old West.

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron is the adventurous tale of a wild mustang stallion and his journey through the untamed American wilderness of the 1800s, where he encounters the unrelenting drive of westward expansion. As far as animated features are concerned, Spirit is a genuine thoroughbred, not at all the turkey that some might expect given its broad scope and problematic nature. How come? The answer in two words: Jeffrey Katzenberg.







Comments


having only seen the trailer-visuals,i can probably agree with most folks who have seen this artistic movie,that is done with great "scenic"and "old west-indians-cowboys"...perfection, but did the "committe" deserve any "credit" for this? no-no-no,and no; because this "idea" about doing an animated story with all the "old-west" players ...has been DONE...over and over and over! the true folks taking (orders) from the "comitte" deserve all the credit+ the story teller. currently the western states are experiencing a severe drought; and...our movie-going folks are..ALSO dying of THIRST...for somthing to "drink"...which is not sickeningly-pittifully- insanley-redundant! this committe has taken upon itself to...continue ...THE DROUGHT! they do not care if audiences are LEFT to see a feature that has been done-probably hundreds of times. the least the comitte-controled dudes should do..is to apologize forlack of imagination, for not looking for somthing ..ORIGIONAL! do they use a "dart-board" to select the .."next production"? 10-20 years from now , the "drought" will continue..unless all the audiences get tired of being denied "a drink" of fresh water-animation. my apologies...for writing this in such redundant manner,and hope you-all reading this learn to recognize..REDUNDANCY, because the movie going audiences are still "buying" bottled-water,with NO WATER...IN THE BOTTLE! DAWK
dale mc farlane (not verified) | Wed, 05/29/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
After seeing ads about the art and animation I could hardly wait to see Spirit. It was not what I expected at all and it upset some children to the point that they wanted to leave and did leave. The children that stayed left in subdued moods asking lots of questions. Most of the kids were in the 2-5 age group. As an aspiring animation scriptwriter with just one script under my belt I offer this humble opinion. The story line had too many messages, it did not clearly target it's age group and for the age group brought to the theatre it was way,way too rough. Children cannot stand to see animals treated badly under any circumstance. I hope Dreamworks keeps up the wonderful artwork and amazing animation but decides on a story line right from the start. Michelle
Michelle Rooney (not verified) | Mon, 05/27/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
This movie should have been called "Skip-it: Go To CinnaBon"! I didn't care about Spirit as a character. The herd of horses may as well not have been in the movie, since they didn't seem to care about Spirit either. The best character in the film is the blacksmith. The bit where he tries to shoe and brand Spirit is the most clever part of the film... but it's not that clever. The whole movie plays like a Bryan Adams video, because that's basically what it is. We see many diferent types of animals in the intro, but never again in the rest of the film. It would have been nice to see them somewhere later on. I hope "Lilo & Stitch" is a decent film. If not, 2D animated movies will be much more like "Hey Arnold" and "Recess" than the classics we've all enjoyed. Too bad. If you still want to see "Spirit", you better hurry up. It won't be in the theater long.
None None (not verified) | Mon, 05/27/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.