The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Hunchback of MTV?
Max Fleischer's motto was "If it could be done with live action, it's
not animation," and Dave Fleischer once griped to me about how many
thousands of times he had to repeat that to the animators over the years
to get them to improve their work with those imaginative, visionary impossibilities
that belonged exclusively to the realm of creative animation. What would
the poor Fleischer brothers think about the current animation scene, in
which almost every animation studio is involved in duplicating live-action
stories?
One can hardly help asking that question about Disney's latest feature,
The Hunchback of Notre Dame, which has already been filmed several
times as a live-action feature, in addition to Franz Schmidt's operatic
treatment (which supplied some of the music for the Alfred Newman score
to William Dieterle's splendid 1939 version). The answer, however, is that
Disney has managed to make a wonderful movie out of Hunchback (with
one hideous blemish, which we'll come back to later), a film so moving and
thrilling and inspiring that it doesn't matter whether it's live-action
or animation. It's just a good movie.
The adaptation of the story, credited to Gorillas in the Mist screenwriter
Tab Murphy, cleverly eliminated some of the complexities of Victor Hugo's
storyline, carefully sidestepping the brothels, tortures and philosophical
intricacies (the two heroes, one poet and one warrior, are condensed to
one sensitive soldier) and other aspects of the original which would have
been unsuitable for younger viewers. Making Clopin a narrator/master-of-ceremonies
was also an excellent idea that allows the basically adult story to become
an excellent childrens' adventure tale.
Of Dieterle Born
It must be noted that the adaptation is very much of Dieterle's Hunchback--in
particular, Charles Laughton's boyish Quasimodo with his one lumpy eye is
clearly the model, just as Sir Cedric Hardwicke's thin, pinched face inhabits
the animated villain Frollo. But this doesn't really matter, because the
Dieterle film is so fine, it amounts to good taste to imitate it, and in
most cases the Disney version lives up to the high standard set by the earlier
film. For example, the brilliant scene (not in Hugo, but created by Bruno
Frank) in which Esmeralda enters Notre Dame for the first time, and prays
to Mother of God to help her outcast people while the "devout Christians"
pray for money, sex and glory, the Disney team have supplied a great musical
number "God Help the Outcasts" with knockout color visuals, Esmeralda
slowly walking through the shadows and light-shafts of the cathedral until
she finally stands bathed in a mandala of light from one of the stained-glass
rose windows.
Art director Dave Goetz, layout supervisor Ed Ghertner and background/color
artist Lisa Keene deserve special credit for creating and sustaining a medieval
atmosphere, and a clear sense of the antithesis between the sacred and profane
which lies at the heart of the story. Key staff visited Paris to study the
real Notre Dame cathedral and Victor Hugo's own sketches of the Paris he
knew and imagined, while Disney's unit continued to provide authentic detail,
and this all pays off superbly.

























Post new comment