Forbidden Animation: A Valuable Contribution
Although opposed to repression, Cohen is aware of the problems that may
result with unfettered expression -- seen earlier in his sympathetic approach
to those objecting to Song of the South. Cohen later asks, will
freedom of expression be exercised mainly by those who can afford to make
films supporting their points of view? Will the financial risks involved
in film production result only in films that are acceptable to the widest
possible audience? These are questions worth further study.
Cohen's approach to the material is that of an empiricist. He appears either
uninterested or unaware of theoretical literature that relates to censorship
or systems of repression. Although Cohen usually works from the films themselves
and from such primary documentation as oral histories, the Hays Office
files, U.S. Congressional Committee hearings transcripts, he sometimes
includes anecdotal material gained in conversations with researchers and
enthusiasts as if it were fact. There are occasional minor inaccuracies,
such as the dates of the establishment of British censorship categories,
and far too many spelling errors, such as "dignified rolls" instead
of "dignified roles." But these are minor complaints about a
valuable contribution to the literature on animation, and a volume that
will doubtlessly be gracing many of our bookshelves.
Forbidden Animation: Censored Cartoons and Blacklisted
Animators in America, by Karl F. Cohen,
McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 1997. 230 pages, illustrated.
ISBN: 0-7864-0395-0.
To order this book, call (in the U.S.) 800-253-2187
Mark Langer teaches film at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He is a frequent contributor to scholarly journals and a programmer of animation retrospectives.























Post new comment