Brad Bird & Pixar Tackle CG Humans Like True Superheroes

Bill Desowitz interviews Incredibles director Brad Bird, supervising technical director Rick Sayre and effects supervisor Sandra Karpman about bringing human CG superheroes to the big screen.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

BD: But most of the R&D pertained to the characters?

RS: Yes, we had to completely revamp our entire character pipeline: how the models are rigged, what animation controls are provided and even how the animators interact with the models. The basic idea was to go more physical and for the first time at Pixar to build significant underpinnings for the human characters. Bob [Mr. Incredible] has skeleton, bones, muscles have attachment points on those bones, they move over those bones, they bulge, there’s a layer of fat, there’s skin over that and there’s super supra on top of that. This was all very new for us: If the goal is to perfectly match the live-action actor, there is a right answer. And that right answer is: When the skeleton is posed this way, the actor will look like this. That means that you can have a process for the animator who animates the skeletons and hands it off to the computer or the technical directors, but for us, who cares what’s right?

We’re into believability. What we came up with allowed animators to pose the characters in a way in which all that [physical stuff] was happening and in realtime. The physical was the thing you couldn’t run away from. But once you got there, you had the will and the means and the desire to caricature. On top of that, we had squash-and-stretch for the bones to give the characters more flexibility. And we had some fix up sculpt tools that would let the animators very specifically control what the physics should do. We learned with faces that in some cases reality can be a crutch. It’s the scary zombie thing you want to stay away from.

We don’t want all of the texture detail because we’re caricaturing. But if you take it all out, it looks like plastic or foam, so we had to make it more complex to make the simplicity work. We had to come up with a subsurface scattering technique where light goes in, bounces around, goes in here and comes out there. It’s an illusion that we’re holding together with forces of will at every moment.

BD: Sandra, what was it like setting up visual effects at Pixar?

Sandra Karpman: Pixar is not set up like an effects house, even though it has the talent and the tools. Pixar’s main pipeline is like a live-action set. When you do effects you bring in a second unit, you shoot it when the actors aren’t there, you shoot the actors against a bluescreen so you don’t blow them up and kill them. Our effects are still like a different beast. How are we going to shoehorn this fluid simulation into our factory pipeline that is so awesome at making sets and characters? We have the same problems as live action, but we just solve them slightly differently. The biggest challenge was the sheer volume of the effects shots. Pixar has done them before, and the effects in Finding Nemo were phenomenal and under appreciated by the effects community.

On top of doing the effects and making them fit in with what Brad wanted art direction-wise, it was very important to me that we put the effects into the complex Pixar pipeline so the lighters could light them in the same scene that they lit with the characters. We still had to layer our effects and composite them in as if they were a live-action plate. The only difference is that we didn’t have to do camera match move and full-body roto. The interesting thing is our effects were often actually the gag, such as when Bob slams the car door and the window shatters. Or when the little boy’s bubblegum pops.

BD: How many visual effects shots were there?

SK: There were 781. Explosions, water, debris, dust, clouds, fire, lava, lava bubbles. But what was different here was we got the effects approved while they were still animating. A good example was when the mother and kids are splashing around in the water. We made the water surface first, then got it approved by Brad so the animators knew where the waves were, so characters could interact with the ebb and flow of the waves. Then they animated to the main wave; we then brought it back and did the specific water surface to character interaction in effects.

So there were some pipelines that tied little bowties, which was unusual for Pixar. It was hard scheduling while waiting for animation… Brad really wanted the animators to sequence a shot so they were really connected, so that would be a drag waiting for all five shots in a sequence to be done. But we would find what we could do.







Comments


I came across this article after searching for more info about Brad and Rick. I just watched the DVD version last night and was completely oblivious to the techical nightmares that it took the pull this off. I think that's a testament to the quality of work that the entire staff at pixar did. Jeez, it's hard enough to do cheesy 3D just getitng a ball to be lighted correctly and spin around. And to have some half-wit boogerman complain about the story line of the film. He's got a capital L tatooed on his forehead. Now I'm going to watch the movie again on dvd, and some of the scenes I'll look at frame by frame to get a sense of the technical challenges and the work involved behind the computer. Thanks for a great article from a technical standpoint. I hope to find more at your website... especially about the attitude and motivation required to press on while everything seems hopeless. It seems pixar had some of those days, but they made it through it. Was it beer?
Steve Wasiura (not verified) | Fri, 04/08/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink
booger, yer just lookin for something to complain about. where's the story? the first 60 minutes were practically all story. maybe you were in line for popcorn ;)
chris georgenes (not verified) | Mon, 11/29/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
I loved it, and my daughter loved it and my wife loved it - but the director of the child care for the kids where my daughter goes after school was indifferant. As a married guy and father there is a lot of meat there for us, and the kids like it - but a single person in their 20 didn't - maybe it just doesn't hit the notes for that age range - Venusian
Venusian (not verified) | Mon, 11/15/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Whoa, Booger man...who peeed in your corn flakes. C'mon, I think you're being a little harsh. The story was right there in front of you. The character development was the reason why it slowed down it's pace at the beginning. It was so refreshing that Brad Bird had the guts to pull away from the "rush to the point" formula that too many animated flicks get pressured into. This is an excellent follow up to Mr. Birds first Feature (Iron Giant). It might be hard for some people to except the fact that this film is geared toward older kids and adults who are young at heart but want more than shallow slapstick and 'silly' humour. The music is bang on, the the character voices and acting is sharp and the action is as good as any film out there. Move over Spiderman. There's a much better super hereo movie in town.
Paul Trineer (not verified) | Thu, 11/11/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Did anybody find The Incredibles formulaic? The technology produces wonderful images, but where is the story? Toy Story advanced the technology and the story world. I was just bored watching this drivel. The film could have been cut down to ninety minutes in my opinion. I feel lucky that all I wasted was a Sunday afternoon and five dollars. Next time I wait to rent DVD. Pixar is losing it.
Booger Mann (not verified) | Tue, 11/09/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.