Book Review: Drawing the Line: The Untold Story of the Animation Unions from Bosko to Bart Simpson

Tom Sito's new book chronicles the history of the Animation Union. Libby Reed has read it and tells us whether it's worth putting on your wish list.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

Tom Sito has written a book called Drawing the Line: The Untold Story of the Animation Unions from Bosko to Bart Simpson, and it tells a fascinating tale. It starts out as a history of the Animation Union (currently known as the Animation Guild), but winds up being a history of animation itself. Not a paean to the union, it tells of the darker side of some of the union people, as well as the terrible way animators were treated before the union came to power. Sito has put the struggles of animators and how the union was begun into a context of what was happening in the wider world. He follows its metamorphosis through various stages until present day, in a meticulously researched book filled with anecdotes from animation people who were there to live the stories.

After an acknowledgement of contributors that lists just about everybody of note in the business, Sito's introduction is titled, "Why a History of Animation Unions?" and he frankly admits that when he first started he was "not a supporter of any union.” He goes on with one of the reasons that he wrote the book; "Love them or hate them, for the last century the unions are the one undeniable fact of life in Hollywood animation. For animators it is a lost piece of our history, of who we are."

The Theory of the Assembly Line
Animation is art by assembly line, as Sito notes. The great masters like Michelangelo used helpers to paint in details and backgrounds in much the same way. In 1913, the first animation production line idea came from a book called, The Principles of Scientific Management, the same theories that Henry Ford used in setting up his production lines. Sito maintains that this system was what determined that animation would be an industry and not just a group of artists cooperating. He tells of how and why the first labor unions were formed.

Along the way, Sito drops in some fascinating facts. The movie terms “gaffer,” “grip” and “best boy” came from the practice of hiring circus people in the early movie days. Inkers and painters were first known as “blackeners,” because they worked on the black bodies of Felix the Cat or Mickey Mouse. He tells the hilarious story of why Walt Disney started holding his wrap parties off the studio grounds.

The Not So Golden Years
Then he gets into less benign facts. During the "Golden Years" of animation there was no overtime, 55-hour work weeks, no vacation time at all and, of course, no health care or pensions. At Warner Bros., in 1940, you were expected to animate 23 feet or 276 finished drawings minimum per week. At MGM it was 25 feet, and at Iwerks it was 30 feet, according to Sito. Compare that to five feet at Disney in 1990. Still, during the Depression, animators had a fairly good life, compared to the millions of people out of work all over the U.S. Sito has done a good job of relating animation's place in the overall picture.

Discrimination was rampant. Lillian Friedman was promoted to animator in 1935 and got paid $40 a week as contrasted to a man's salary of $125. Disney felt women might distract the men and so closeted his I&P department in another building and they were strictly forbidden to go in the animation building. Oddly enough there was little discrimination against Asian Americans, but a lot against blacks and gays, according to Sito. He details many more humiliations and firings, as well as the hard drinking and suicides of that era.

Suits Weren't Liked
Sito goes on to relate the executives' side of the story, as least as seen by the artist. Most of the “suits” were disliked, if not hated. Leon Schlesinger was one of the good ones, says Sito, taking care of the business side and letting the artists govern themselves. He reportedly got more and better quality work out of his artists than anyone else. Most of the suits knew nothing about animation, but they were the ones to accept the Oscars.

"The Great Depression had a psychologically leveling effect on much of society," says Sito. He goes on to explain that, "The elites of society; artists, poets and intellectuals, made common cause with common people." Only the mega rich were exempt from the misery of the day. And this set the stage for union organization. He tells of some of the outrageous situations that enraged the working animators and I&P women. He reports about the thugs who were hired to put down any possible union sympathy, both here and in New York. He tells of the movie stars who came out to help.

The Famous Strikes
There is so much information packed into this very readable book that it would be pointless to try to highlight everything. Chapters three, four and five cover an amazing number of facts and incidents. Here, too, are a lot of the personal anecdotes that add so much flavor to this book. Everybody knows about the "Great Disney Strike.” But there was a big one prior to that. Sito has an exciting re-creation of the Fleisher strike in 1937, which had fistfights, stink bombs, firings, salary cuts and a huge boycott. The studio was moved to Florida to avoid becoming union.

Sito describes the Disney strike in great detail. It lasted more than six months and involved most of the best artists in the business. A tent camp was set up on the field that now houses St. Joseph's Hospital. It also involved gangsters sent from the east to control the Hollywood union. The many illustrations include not only pictures of the strikers and their signs, but letters written by both sides and copies of union newsletters and a New York Daily News headline that reads, "Communists Tried to Capture Mickey Mouse, Says Disney".











Comments


oczwVZ (not verified) | Sun, 08/28/2011 - 23:27 | Permalink

And yes, I made a typo above when I added an extra "n" to Bobe Cannon's last name which I misspelled as "Cannnon".

Mea culpa.

Charles (not verified) | Thu, 04/14/2011 - 22:35 | Permalink

It's a pretty interesting book, but very sloppily written. Many typos, misspelled names, and factual errors. This is surprising from someone who has worked in animation and styles himself as a "historian". It's unfortunate that the University of Kentucky Press editors did not do better fact-checking.

Just one random example (from DOZENS I could choose from) : on page 19 Sito writes "At UPA, the rivalry was between the John Hubley and Bill Hurtz units. Hurtz told me he always regretted the studio's decision not to enter his masterpiece , "A Unicorn in the Garden" , for Oscar consideration for fear it would harm the chances of their other entry , Hubley's "Gerald McBoing-Boing" , which eventually won."

1.) John Hubley did not direct Gerald McBoing-Boing. It was directed by Bobe Cannnon. (and by the way, Bill Hurtz worked on Gerald McBoing-Boing as the production designer ... think Hurtz forgot that he worked on Gerald or who directed Gerald when he supposedly "told" this anecdote to Sito ? ) .

2.) The film "The Unicorn in the Garden" (not "A Unicorn in the Garden" as Sito mislabels it) was released in 1953 , two years after "Gerald McBoing-Boing" was released in 1951. So there is no way the two films could have been in a "rivalry" within the UPA studio as to which one would be submitted for an Academy Award nomination, since they were not made in the same year.

3.) Also, by 1953 , the year of release for Bill Hurtz's "The Unicorn in the Garden" John Hubley was no longer at UPA , having been forced out in 1952 , the same year that Bill Hurtz was first promoted to a Director at UPA, so how could there have been a rivalry between Hubley's unit and Hurtz's unit as Tom Sito writes , when Hurtz wasn't yet directing while Hubley was still at the studio ?

Any well-informed animation fan should know better than this , how much more so a "historian" .

Another doozy from Sito: on page 17 Sito writes "Master designer Kay Neilson was the designer of the unique look of the Beethoven's Pastoral sequence in Fantasia"

First of all , the designer's name last name is spelled Nielsen (not "Neilson" as Sito misspells it ) . Second , Kay Nielsen did not work as a designer on the Pastoral Symphony sequence in Fantasia. Nielsen designed the Night on Bald Mountain/Ave Maria sequence . This is well-known .

And just one more :
On page 47 and page 48 Sito's sloppy writing creates a gloss that makes it seem like artist Joe Grant worked continuously at Disney from 1934 to 2005 . On page 47 he writes of Joe Grant: "Joe had been at Disney since the Three Little Pigs in 1934 and was still drawing and contributing to movies in 2005 ." Then on page 48 under a photo of Joe Grant from the 1930's Sito writes: "Grant was first hired for his skill at caricature. He stayed at the studio until 2005" . Somehow Tom forgets to mention the fact that Joe Grant left the Disney studio in 1949 , and did not return until 1989 as a part-time consultant , then as a full-time employee starting in 1991 to 2005 (when he died) . So unless you know better you wouldn't get from Sito's book that Joe Grant was not at Disney from 1949 to 1989 , an absence of 40 years . Also, Sito says that Grant has "been at Disney since the Three Little Pigs in 1934" , but in fact the Three Little Pigs was released in 1933, but who's counting anymore , eh ?

How is one to take this book as a work of serious scholarship when it is chock full of such elementary mistakes about animation history? Embarrassing.

Charles (not verified) | Thu, 04/14/2011 - 22:31 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.