Whose Golden Age?: Canadian Animation In The 1990s
"Canadian
animation is heading in the direction in which it is perceived that Canadians
minds are heading." - Marv Newland
For some, the 1990s are the new golden age of Canadian animation. Canadian
production is booming. NELVANA and Cinar are among the world leaders in
television animation output, and schools like Sheridan College (which recently
received $12 million from the Ontario government to open a New Technology
Center), Vancouver Film School, and Algonquin College are expanding to
accommodate increased demand for enrollment. Teletoon, Canada's first animation
specialty channel, went to air in September 1997, and Walt Disney has opened
studios in Vancouver and Toronto.
However, for others the 1990s are viewed as the decade of the demise of
Canadian animation. For them, such factors as huge cuts to Canada's fabled
National Film Board of Canada (NFBC), and the terrible state of the Canadian
independent animation scene, indicate a diminishedif not impoverishedindependent
animation community.
The National Film Board Of Canada
The National Film Board of Canada remains the calling card for Canadian
animation. "[M]any have benefited," noted Canadian animation
legend, Frédéric
Back, "from the inventiveness, liberty of
creation, and technical progress [that Norman McLaren] inspired and favored."
However a combination of budget cuts and lack of creative vision suggest
that this "card" is an illusion built on past successes rather
than current realities. "The NFB is no longer a serious player in
arts and communication," said former NFB producer, Derek Lamb. "[The
NFB is the creation] of a post-war, industrial age, managed by aging industrial
mindsets, who will not, and cannot be expected to provide visionary, artistic
leadership now or for the future." Nevertheless, Marilyn Cherenko
(Emily Carr School of Design) notes that "`court art' like the NFB
is still extremely valuable though guidelines for submitting projects have
become increasingly lumbered with political agendas. [A]t its best the
NFB has provided the opportunity for work requiring real investigation
and experimentation, such as Two Sisters by Caroline Leaf, How
Wings Are Attached to the Backs of Angels by Craig Welch, and Strings
by Wendy Tilby, to name obvious examples."
Ellen Besen, a former NFB animator and currently an instructor at Sheridan
College, feels that the decline of the NFB goes beyond budget cuts and
back to the early 1980s, when a bureaucrat named Doug McDonald, who had
no animation background, was given control of the studio. During this time,
Besen noted, the board desperately wanted a specialty channel and clamped
down on the films to ensure that they were market-driven and followed a
specific agenda. Furthermore, McDonald immediately altered the physical
layout of the animation studio. "The NFB used to have this great open
social area. When McDonald came in, it became his office. A windowless
storage room became the new `social' rendezvous for animators. The whole
atmosphere of the studio changed," said Besen, "Ideas used to
be welcome. Dialogue existed between producers, executives, and filmmakers.
Today, it is just producer-driven. They simply try to find a niche."
The Rights from The Heart series, is perhaps the most explicit example
of the embarrassing politically correct nature of the board today.
Of course, budget cuts have had a significant impact on the NFB and should
not be overlooked. The cuts combined with the erasure of creative vision
have turned the NFB from a stimulating, creative environment into what
Besen deems "a formless, impossible labyrinth." Despite the harsh
criticism of the NFB, it is essential that we not forget that the board
was created to serve as a propaganda tool. Canada is fortunate that NFB
founder, John Grierson, who animation critic, Marc Glassman deems "a
closet effete," went out of his way to get Norman McLaren and allowed
him complete artistic freedom in running the animation studio.
























Post new comment