The Animation Pimp: Elbows and Cakeholes

The Animation Pimp discusses the Academy's choices for Best Animated Short Film and suggests that some changes are made to their nominating process.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld | Columns: The Animation Pimp

No Shortage of Shortcomings…
It doesn’t take a Mensa member to see the shortcomings here. FIRST, the Academy is only getting about 300 films. Ottawa got 1700. Annecy got around 1400. Even smaller festivals in Holland, Hiroshima and Zagreb have over 1000 entries. (Yes…some of these are ineligible commissioned works, but in Ottawa 75% of the entries are short films.) And this isn’t really a surprise. Unless you’re fortunate enough to win first prize at an approved festival, you’ve got to fork over a few U.S. dollars to set up a screening. Most entrants would be scared off way before that when they see that they’ve got to set up a public screening. I mean…how many non-studio backed animators can afford this? The NFB in Canada is loaded and have staff and money to look after the Oscar submissions, but what about the rest of Canada? When was the last time we saw a non-studio supported Canadian animation in the running? And what about indie animators in the rest of the world? They spend most of the year just trying to find money for prints, videos, stills, entry fees (in the U.S. of course)…how the fug are they supposed to come up with a few hundred magic beans AND ship their film print to/from L.A.? Tough toodies I guess.

This small body of films is then judged by maybe 30 Academy members, most of whom (not all) are either old farts and/or studio types who likely don’t go to many international animation festivals AND have a prevalence toward farce/gag/anthropomorphism films. I’m not knocking them per se. Nothing wrong with liking cute monsters and all that assorted techno fetish stuff BUT, are these same people open minded/informed enough to deal with Mulloy, Kovalyov, Pärn, Dumala, let alone Hinton, Cournoyer, Odell or Broadbrook? (I suspect of course that Home Road Movies was deemed NON-animation by the liberal Academy members.) There are other voices…not all of whom ONLY love good ol’ fashioned chuckle a minute shorts with lovable nippleless animals, but clearly they are a minority.

So what the world is getting in the end is a fraudulent representation of international animation. And this isn’t an anti-American rant, so take those about to be breathed words and stuff them back down your pipehole. These are Los Angeles awards, they are a celebration of the Hollywood industry. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that EXCEPT that you’re leading the public (those three people who care about the animation short category!) to believe that these five animations represent the best of animation around the world and, taste issues aside, we all know that is complete and utter bullshit. Why the hell not just call it the Best American Animation Short (Yes…why not do the same with the Best Film as well!)?

Can We Help?
So what’s the solution? Boycott? Nah…that means even less representation. Perhaps making more of an effort to contact animators would be a start (I've heard through the grapevine that Ron Diamond, for example, contacts, encourages and helps a number of filmmakers whose films he saw and liked at international festivals). [Editor's Note: Ron Diamond is the co-founder and president of Animation World Network, www.awn.com.] A better explanation of the entry procedure, or simply doing away with this ludicrous public screening rule would be a start. And aside from offering the Academy frat club either 1. an elbow in the mouth or 2. a swift kick up their crusty, aged cakeholes for their myopic tastes, why not invite more international representation? Wouldn’t it make sense for the Academy to have a closer link with ASIFA International? Now I realize that you couldn’t just have every ASIFA member become an Academy member, but why not invite the ASIFA International Board or the President of every national ASIFA chapter to be an Academy member? It would not only encourage those people to explain the entry process to their members, but it would also widen the taste buds of the voting process. And what about festival programmers/directors? “You” might not like my taste, but you can’t argue with the fact that I easily see at least 1000 new films per year as do my colleagues around the world. Why would the Academy not welcome the obvious expertise of festival programmers?

So naturally…the absolutelybestestgreatestfantasticstupendous step that the Academy can take is to vote me in, right now.

Okay…it’s March…Spring is coming…the birds are singing…let’s not end on bad terms. We’ve still got the Animated Feature category and at least the feature voters showed great humour by nominating that horsey film over Mutant Aliens for Best Feature. That’s one of the great pranks of the century. What a riot those guys are! Ba ha ha ha.

Hottie Animator(s) of the Month
For their generosity and time during my short February visit to New York, I say merci to Bill Plympton, Signe Baumane, Richard O’Connor and Candy Kugel (whose pasta blows the overpriced trickery of da Silvano away).

Chris Robinson is but a man. His hobbies include squirrel taunting, goat thumping, meat dancing and elderly peeping. You can find the results at http://asifa.net/robinson







Comments


Mr.Pimp, that’s an entertaining article and nice touch on that ‘chair’ bit, but I have to say Mr. Jeff Wolverton’s delightful and gracious response has given this particular animation-pimp experience a richer contrapuntal texture.
Isha sayed khan (not verified) | Mon, 04/07/2003 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.