The Animation Pimp: ±½¦ÁÉÀ¿Â ¼¿Á¦·

Talking animals...why are we so attached to the talking animals? The Pimp, of course, has some ideas.
Posted In | Columns: The Animation Pimp

We Even Have A Word For It
We usually call this anthropomorphism. It comes from the Greek title above meaning "human form." The word though is misleading as its roots are connected with the notion of giving human characteristics and form to anything non-human. So, for e.g., Homer's inclusion of Zeus in human form is anthropomorphism. Monsters Inc., Luxo Jr., Toy Story, MVP (where they have this chimp dolled up in Poochie inspired threads) and on and on and on...are all anthropomorphic films.

Now visual interpretations of animals can be traced back to Ice Age cave paintings (no...not that Blue Sky film). The paintings seemed to be a mix of religious or magical (animals were often seen as mythological creatures) symbols or as diagrams for hunting (see Joseph Campbell The Power of Myth). The hunting paintings were almost like rehearsals for the actual kill. There were apparently even marks found on some of these drawings suggesting that perhaps the hunters felt that what they did to the rendering would also occur in reality. The paintings were often skilful re-creations of the movement and form of the animals. Other images depicted animals doing the nasty or even human-animal characters. For Jungians the crossbreed portraits were linked to the primitive animal instinct within humans. There were accompanying ceremonies with masks, dances based on animal movements. Human identity submerged into animal during these rituals. Maybe it was felt that one could vanquish all animalistic rage from within? Maybe it was just some guilt release for killing? Maybe they just like the friggin shape of the animals? Perhaps there was some weird sex shit happening? Whatever. Either way, there was an aspect of spiritual awe and respect connected with these early paintings.

And of course if we turn to religions, we can find all sorts of animal symbols. Apu's Ganesh monument is human-elephant. Ol' perv Zeus would often take the form of an animal when he sought to vanquish some seed...and yadda yadda yadda...that Christian superstud, J.C. is connected with animals right from the get go.

In Greek literature, Aristophanes actually mocked men's desire to emulate animals in his farce, The Birds where two men, tired of the rigours and tyranny of Athenian society decide to bail and join with the birds. Eventually the two twits take over the bird race and turn it into the very society they fled. And Aesop's Fables are perhaps the most enduring, although today most of us know only the sanitized versions courtesy of those fun-loving Ivy League-Victorian-pull over wearing Christians. Aesop's Fables also provided material for animation, notably Walt Disney's Tortoise and The Hare.

And rather than trace through the whole history of art and animals (including live-action animal films like Benji, bizarre cross-breeding epics like the Shaggy D.A., Disney nature films, Fairy Tales...and my favourites, The Master and Margarita and Heart of The Dog, two fine books by Mikhail Bulgakov), let's skip ahead and focus on animation. Animation, perhaps more than any other art, has relied heavily on the use of animals to transmit perceptions of human behaviour and form. Why animals? It's likely a combination of the influence of comic strips, photographs and fairy tales. And as Linda Simensky (Cartoon Network) told me, a need/desire/pressure in 1920s animation to do the most absurd things...like making animals and objects talk. Now most of this stuff (Felix, Gertie, Bugs, Daffy) was not aimed at children, but adults. Disney was maybe the first to tailor animal (and hell, animation) toward children.

An Enduring Love
Why are kids so taken with animals? Well one schlub named Dan Acuff noted: "Research has shown that as much as 80 percent of children's dream content is of animals up to the age of about six. It appears through animal dreams children work on the resolution of a variety of issues and fears that they are dealing with in their young lives." Seems to me this is a crock; children's dreams are filled with animals likely because they are surrounded by them via television, movies, books and toys. Naturally they're gonna dream about animals.

Children's toys are often mini-versions of objects and animals in the natural world. The stuffed wild animals like bears are easily controllable within the child's world. Animals become silent, tame, friendly and predictable. The bears don't bite, the dolls don't talk back. The trucks, trains, planes and cars go when and where the child wants. It makes the world less intimidating and allows children the opportunity to practice and articulate their social and mechanical tools. And there certainly seems to be a case for the belief that children better absorb what they're learning through their toys. They are often on their own, out of the spotlight, like a rehearsal. It's also an issue of control. Difference is harnessed.









Comments


And what about Fritz the Cat?
Jeremy (not verified) | Mon, 03/08/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Indeed, this article seems overdrawn and underinspired not to mention completely illegible. The article was perfectly summarised in a few sentences by Jane Sake. AP, writing by the word? ;)
Jeremy Joseph (not verified) | Mon, 03/08/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
Fine dont post this but I thout is was funny I was Talking about god at the end of the last posting, on an artitcal about athrapamorphism and I almost refered to god as him lol .
Pigalow Bradley (not verified) | Thu, 07/25/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
About stewert little . I have never met somboty whom ever acted like he did (Yes I saw it have a little cousin )he is not any part actual indavidual humanbeing . He is what they think people should act like in biped mouse like form . Distilled media, to be glib . Second " I am not a chicken but I know what an egg is " Isnt empathy one of the piller's of the human mind . What is a club but a stick man asosiate's with his agression ? and so on and so on till be built the titanic . Now im not saying that the titanic was the greatist thing we as a spieses could do ( I deliberetly did not say acomplish there )but in the end isnt that empathy a , if not the , key element of human existace? and in clossig god wouldnt have given us ower ceribelom's if it had not intendid us to use them . Keep up the good work . Ps always good to hear a sipmson's quoat .
Pigalow Bradley (not verified) | Thu, 07/25/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
hey chris- that was entirely too long an article trying to JUSTIFY the current decades of insane "animal" animations, you were too nice,and was hoping there would be more cursing! stewart little -2 promotions have hit the public pages,and i was just thinking about the same (historical- psychological- anilitical) items,you...so elequintly wrote about. these sequils about talking animals, like stewart little are making me wonder...if there are actually real people ..out-there who will go see this kind of commercial-animal-talking-crap! i can recall talking sled-dogs, from dizney,and that one really "skunked" me-out, but as to...WHY, would this kind of ameatureism -animation.......continues, is the big question. the answer needs to be revealed by the many (new concepts) which could easily out-compete this kind of studio-commercial-retro "monkeybusiness". if only the public viewing-movie-going folks NEW what they are MISSING! i feel it is up to the very brave..who will eventually over-come this tidal wave of talking animal trash.these brave "new-concept" folks will need all the media help they can get, as this is a monoply by the "old-school" big- money goons,and they are not going away, unless movie-goers start BOYCOTTING these films..exactly like the stock market.. INVESTORS are doing,with the statment... "stop the rip-off or else" ,and just watch...the "talking animal toons" dissapear! the starved-for-anything-animated customers need to "get-tough" and until they do...this is not going to resolve itself. dawk
dale mc farlane (not verified) | Wed, 07/17/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Anthopormorphism, taken to its inevitable, hellish conclusion. I don't think this is what ol' Tex Avery had in mind. www.furnation.com Yeep.
Neil LaPointe (not verified) | Mon, 07/15/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Cute, fluffy bunnies are used for the same reason "Star Trek" always delivered its messages through an alien or android: the same message delievered by a human would be preachy and boring. When it's delievered by a non-human character, we Learn a Valuable Lesson on the State of Mankind. I think I'll go have a beer now...one that's advertised by lizards and frogs...
Andy (not verified) | Sun, 07/14/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.