Survey: How to Finance Independent Animation

Chris Robinson surveys some of the leading independent animators in the world to discover how they find the funds to produces their films.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

Three things motivated this survey.

1. During the last 12 years or so I’ve seen too many student animation films become an epitaph rather than a prelude.

2. There SEEMS to be less state support for non-commercial culture, yet there are more independently produced animation works being made now than at any other time in the history of animation.

3. A N.Y. subway jaunt with Steven Dovas.

Clearly folks are finding a way to make film, but how? I decided to ask a bunch of ‘em and find out.

I’ve always plowed money from commercial work back into independent work.

Credit cards and savings are my magical answer to funding, also I worked as an illustrator to fund my films: telephone books in the deep south funded Mrs Matisse and a book called I love you because funded Everybody’s Pregnant.

I have a problem applying for grants as they are in artspeak, a language I never learned. And for me to delineate the parameters of a film beforehand messes with my creative process and actually steers me off the track. I say if you want to make it fund it yourself.

Debra Solomon, U.S.A.
http://www.debrasolomon.com

 

 

Financing of Ring of Fire:
Complete Budget: 300 000 €
Prize Money: 20% (We put all the prize money we’ve got for We Lived In Grass into the project)
TV-Presales: 10 % (because we wanted to be independent, we didn’t do a TV co-production, but just presales. It’s less money, but more freedom) filmfund: 60% (The filmfund MfG put most of the money into the project, because they wanted young filmmakers to stay in Baden-Württemberg. You have to spend 100% of the money the filmfund gives you in Baden-Württemberg)
Own money: 10% (which doesn’t mean we’d put the money in the project literally. We just paid ourselves less)

Andreas Hykade, Germany
www.hykade.de







Comments


Dawk, Nice to hear from you. I'm not sure I agree that festivals would be more interesting if there was a more even playing field. first off, there will never be a more even playing field. secondly, its less the films themselves than the people selecting these films for competitions. However...There IS a tendency to recognize technically polished films even if they say sweet nothings....whereas a film that actually says something interesting but might be a bit technically/aesthetically rough all too often gets pushed aside. Until festivals get over their fetish for smooth, polished, flawless techniques, this medium of animation will remain in the realm of household ornament: nice to look at, but s'bout it. Keep up the keeping up. Chris
Chris Robinson (not verified) | Wed, 06/30/2004 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.