Gender in Media: Females Don't Rule

Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

The Media's Acceptance
"Female characters in [6- to 12-year-old-targeted] animation tend to be overlooked," says Sorensen. "The higher-profile shows tend to showcase females that are 'nerdy' or 'needy.' This is because boys tend to drive the 6-12 animation." She says boys drive the 6-12 programs because girls tend to start watching live-action shows while boys are still watching cartoons. This makes boys a prime target for advertisers on animated shows.

According to Sorensen, there are exceptions to the rule, such as Powerpuff Girls. But she hasn't seen anything like these characters in quite a while. "We are seeing the major broadcasters now look to females in The Mighty B and Chowder and I think the progression is great, but time will tell if a show like SpongeBob would ever cast a female in the lead," she said.

Young sees a new future for gender and audience with new media and convergence. Old TV technology and the belief that a girl will watch a boy's show but a boy will not watch a girl's show has stymied programmers until now. "Kabillion, VOD and Online are changing all that," according to Young. Kabillion -- a partnership between Comcast cable and Taffy Entertainment -- is the first multi-platform kids network built around today's hottest TV audience viewing trends -- broadband and video on demand.

"If any gender does not like a particular program, then, unlike the linear channel, which loses one or the other gender to another channel, the new platforms need one click and there is a choice of many, many shows. Thus there should be no fear in driving anyone away, which in turn will lead to a great variety and change in program making," says Young.

What's Next?
Historically, there are multiple reasons why female lead characters are less abundant than males in the television, film, and animation industries. Male writers and/or creative talent were the predominant architects in the building of the animation industry; and, as many writers do, they wrote from the perspective they knew, observes Helppie. Dr. Smith and the GDIGM team came to a similar conclusion.

"Women's role in society has undergone seismic changes over the past 40 years, which has been reflected in an ongoing opening up of creative opportunities for female characters," said Helppie. "And as more female executives came to the forefront with the power to greenlight productions or oversee creative storylines, stronger female identities and less stereotypic portrayals were encouraged. The networks and children's broadcasters also pushed to have more engaging, leadership-driven, and less stereotypic, female roles in their programming."

In her recommendations, Smith suggests that a collaborative effort among entertainment executives, creators, scholars, parents and teachers is needed. While a few women executives have broken through the glass ceiling in the entertainment industry, their influence has had limited results with respect to gender parity and portrayal. Her report shows that, as of 2004, only 18% of WGA-employed film writers and only 27% of TV writers were women. In 2006, female membership in the Animation Guild was only 17.3%, and of these only 8% were producers, 14.9% directors and 10.8% writers. "Maybe the answer is that for change to occur even more women are needed in the creative process where key decision-making occurs at the pitch and story development level," writes Smith.

Or, as she writes in the introduction: "Clearly, along the entire creative and marketing process, participants can develop, design and engage in practical solutions to the problem of gender under-representation aimed at children. As balance and portrayals improve, children now, and the next generation of children, will be the winners. They will be exposed to entertainment in which females take up half the space and both females and males are active, diverse and complex."

Jan Nagel, the Entertainment Marketing Diva, is a consultant who has been involved in the business of animation and visual effects since 1991. She represents creative producers and production companies worldwide, including Small World Animation, Santo Domingo Films, and Jim Keeshen Productions, as well as being a frequent guest lecturer on the subject of the business of animation. She is also a founding member and president emeritus of Women in Animation International.

 

 

 

 







Comments


by terming it a non issue you have finally proved that men really feel inferior and are extremely scared.

vijeta kumar (not verified) | Thu, 08/19/2010 - 06:59 | Permalink
The road may be long, but the journey for women in film and animation has been well on its way for some time. The female gender gains ground with every passing decade in the entertainment sector. As women we need to move forward, not stop and organize a wining session. (come on, Gina. Is this really helping? Are you telling us something we don't know?) We all know the numbers and the statistics, but forward motion cannot be stopped. The female executive/writer/producer/etc. is here to stay!
(not verified) | Thu, 05/29/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thank you, anonymous, for proving what a serious problem this really is. I grew up with very few female heroes, because there just weren't that many around. When I look at a TV show, or a film, or even a commercial (animated or live-action) and see either only a few women or hypersexualized women, not only do I have a hard time identifying with the characters presented, but I am subconsciously being taught that women are not people, women are not important. We come to believe the stories we grow up with as being "true" to the extent that they are based in our real social structure. For example, if we're shown in TV shows and movies that only cheerleaders and the players' girlfriends go to "the big game," why would little girls want to go in real life? To study to become a cheerleader? They're being subconsciously taught "girls don't go to sporting events." This isn't intentional, I realize, but it happens nonetheless. And it's happening because the writers of these stories don't necessarily think about these things. Next time you're being entertained by a story, whether it be on TV or in the movie theater, or even on the stage, count how many integral female characters you see versus the number of male characters. There are four Turtles, one April. There are dozens of reoccurring Muppet characters, yet only one female character of note (not counting Janice), who is traditionally performed by a man. The mayor of Whoville has 94 daughters and one son, yet who do you think gets to save the day? What kind of message do you think that sends to girls watching these kinds of stories? You're not seeing the problem; a fish can't recognize the water it's living in, because it's so used to it "just being there."
Melissa g (not verified) | Tue, 05/27/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
What a load of rubbish - men are portrayed as ignorant, clumsy, dim-witted and clueless. Men are CONSTANTLY portrayed as bad husbands and bad fathers, ignorant, rude and useless. That fact is always conveniently overlooked by women's lib feminazis.
ryan splint (not verified) | Mon, 05/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
tyson murphy (not verified) | Mon, 05/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Good female cartoon characters: 1. All of the girls in "Avatar" - Toph, Katara, even the villiainess Azula. Strong, individual, flawed and original. Kudos to the "Avatar" creators for respecting kids' intelligence. 2. Kim Possible - sometimes a little too slick and perfect, but she's still a true heroine and the productions values of this show are tops. 3. Dora the Explorer - frankly I find her a little creepy, but she's one female character that appeals to both genders (at least until the little boys in her audience are taught that watching a show starring a girl character is sissy). 4. Wanda of the "Fairly Oddparents" - at least until the later seasons, when she was turned into a sexist "nag" stereotype in a doomed and incomprehensible attempt at humor. 5. "The Mighty B" - as Spongebob rip-offs go, this is one of the better ones. And Amy Poehler does a great voice. So it seems that when it comes to female cartoon characters, there have been some successes and failures. I do think the issue is a valid one and that the solution may be for more women to get involved in all areas of animation. I don't think it's a matter of exclusion - that's a thing of the past. Opportunities are now open to women to get involved, but it's going to take some time for them to catch up.
Natalie (not verified) | Mon, 05/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I think the problem with female characters in TV toons is that cartoon writers either fear them (I'm serious - they fear to give them any flaws, lest they be called sexist) or are contemptuous of them (have you seen what they've done to poor Wanda of "Fairly Oddparents"? Shame on you, Butch Hartman!) So, as a result, you get girl characters who are bland and boring or who are abused and insulted in a disturbing "boy's club" sort of way. But there are bright spots: Raven and Starfire in "Teen Titans" are terrific characters, as is Gwen in "Ben 10 Alien Force", and of course there is Disney's wonderful Kim Possible. Also, in the new "Barnyard" series there is the hilariously sassy Bessie. So while there have been failures, there are also some success stories. As a female viewer, I would advise cartoon writers and producers to watch the above examples very carefully in order to learn what - and what NOT - to do.
Natalie Crandall (not verified) | Sun, 05/25/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thanks for this needed report, and special thanks to Geena Davis for her perception and action. Both girls and boys will benefit if the industry follows through.
anonymous (not verified) | Sun, 05/25/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Wait until my show is on the air. For the first time in what seems like history, the males are actually miniority on my cast. The core male cast lies in the heroes of the show, Curly, his brother, and his roommates. But I think the strong point is in his antagonists'-PC, all female villians with wildly different personalities...and they aren't romantic, screams for help types neither... ;-) I see what you're saying-and I've tooken strong notice, even if you go back to the 40's you see there's never quite been a 'Clarabelle Cow' short for every 'Goofy' short-or a 'Minnie Mouse' short for every time she was just tagging behind Mickey. They're always dasmals in distress but...it's not the media really. It breaks down into the directors and producers. What they want. I used to be frustrated with such bias until I realized. Hey that's what (insert name here) wrote, that's what (insert name here) animated, that's what (insert name here) wanted. Not the media in general. I think what's happened is-originality is falling off the face of the Earth, and way too strongly are the same brainless hacks not thinking, "Hmm..hey what if we replaced Wild E. Coyotee with say-a female coyetee instead?" But not me (and yes I'm a straight male). My brief for my series where it stands now? *A great action packed show, with storylines that vary between drama, comedy, and action. *A strong female cast. *No bias against what situations those female characters are caught in (that means female characters know what an anvil falling out of the sky is too..:-) I think TV deserves a better glass of Cardinal, and I'm gonna give it to 'em...I'll show ya!
Anthony Cromartie (not verified) | Sun, 05/25/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Oh my god... not THIS idiotic discussion again. Geena Davis needs to find something to do with her time instead of wasting her energy on a non-issue like this. She might as well open an institute with the intent of exposing that more boys like playing 'Cowboy' than girls do... or a study to prove that boys enjoy blowing up toy cars with firecrackers more than girls do.
anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 05/22/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.