Gender in Media: Females Don't Rule

Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

The Industry Speaks
Tara Sorensen, VP, Development & Current Series for National Geographic Kids Entertainment and one of the panelists at the GDIGM conference, recalls how she had to fight for a female character.

"Jade, of Jackie Chan Adventures, was the only female in the main cast of characters and she was really a breakout star of the show," says Sorensen. "While developing the show, there was a bit of resistance to including this little girl in the core group, but we believed in her as a character and stuck with her. I think she really became the star of the show. There is no doubt that little girls looked up to her, but boys too, I think, found themselves looking up to her. She was definitely a tomboy, so I think that's one reason."

Mike Young, CEO of Mike Young Productions, LLC and partner in Taffy Entertainment, has brought many female characters to the screen in recent years, including the girls of Bratz, Creepie from Growing Up Creepie and his all-time favorite, Dannon, the duck from Jakers: The Adventures of Piggley Winks.

"On the surface the Bratz were all makeup and clothes, but once you got past that they were independent leaders who epitomized self-empowered females," says Young. "Creepie was supposed to be the fish out of water, but firmly believed that everyone else was out of step, not her. Dannon was straight-talking, no nonsense, you got what you saw. She was more intelligent and insightful than her two male pals and was totally loveable."

"Animation is much fairer than our [live-action] TV and big-screen brethren," says Young. Mike Young Productions is also producing female-lead shows Chloe's Closet, Hero 108, which has Mystic Sonia as one of the leads, and bits of Strawberry Shortcake. Young also boasts of having a majority of women running the shop, including his wife, partner and the executive in charge of production, Liz Young.

"What I really like about female characters today, is that they don't all fit the same stereotypic mold of being either babes or ugly/spinsters," says Kathleen Helppie, an independent producer who formerly served as VP of Classic Animation at Warner Bros. and Head of Studio/Production for Starz Animation/Toronto. "We see so many different aspects of the female characterization: body shapes, beauty, race, depth of personality, strength and style. These females are much more dimensional and more reflective of our society at large."

Helppie, who started her career as a voice actress and whose first leading role was Sweets in the Hanna-Barbera series The Biskitts, also believes that caricature cuts both ways. "Women are not alone -- stereotypes of both men and women exist in animation. Audiences laugh because we recognize the exaggerated stereotypes of these characters -- both positive and negative. Stereotypes are often considered to be fully negative, but many stereotypes can help us to realize how ridiculous the characters may be.

"Years ago, I had a lively discussion with animation legend Friz Freleng about the need to create a new female character for Looney Tunes," she continues. "At the time, Friz, who it must be noted was a true gentleman with utmost respect for women, told me in no uncertain terms that female comic characters just wouldn't be funny. He further explained you couldn't have a female character [endure] the same kind of cartoon calamities that would happen to Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Sylvester, or Wile E. Coyote. He felt audiences would not accept, nor find any humor in, this sort of slapstick and physical treatment of female characters."

Helppie points out that female characters today have been greatly empowered physically (e.g., Fiona from Shrek) and that the roles of women in society have evolved significantly. Audience reaction to comedy and slapstick has also shifted dramatically over the decades in terms of what is considered humorous and acceptable to an audience.

"Women don't hold the market on being stereotyped. Our men can be impacted as well. After all, I don't know any men who act [like] or aspire to be Elmer Fudd, or, for that matter, can leap a building in a single bound. To be heroic and muscle-bound all the time has got to be tiring and a tad stereotypic to our men, as well."







Comments


by terming it a non issue you have finally proved that men really feel inferior and are extremely scared.

vijeta kumar (not verified) | Thu, 08/19/2010 - 06:59 | Permalink
The road may be long, but the journey for women in film and animation has been well on its way for some time. The female gender gains ground with every passing decade in the entertainment sector. As women we need to move forward, not stop and organize a wining session. (come on, Gina. Is this really helping? Are you telling us something we don't know?) We all know the numbers and the statistics, but forward motion cannot be stopped. The female executive/writer/producer/etc. is here to stay!
(not verified) | Thu, 05/29/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thank you, anonymous, for proving what a serious problem this really is. I grew up with very few female heroes, because there just weren't that many around. When I look at a TV show, or a film, or even a commercial (animated or live-action) and see either only a few women or hypersexualized women, not only do I have a hard time identifying with the characters presented, but I am subconsciously being taught that women are not people, women are not important. We come to believe the stories we grow up with as being "true" to the extent that they are based in our real social structure. For example, if we're shown in TV shows and movies that only cheerleaders and the players' girlfriends go to "the big game," why would little girls want to go in real life? To study to become a cheerleader? They're being subconsciously taught "girls don't go to sporting events." This isn't intentional, I realize, but it happens nonetheless. And it's happening because the writers of these stories don't necessarily think about these things. Next time you're being entertained by a story, whether it be on TV or in the movie theater, or even on the stage, count how many integral female characters you see versus the number of male characters. There are four Turtles, one April. There are dozens of reoccurring Muppet characters, yet only one female character of note (not counting Janice), who is traditionally performed by a man. The mayor of Whoville has 94 daughters and one son, yet who do you think gets to save the day? What kind of message do you think that sends to girls watching these kinds of stories? You're not seeing the problem; a fish can't recognize the water it's living in, because it's so used to it "just being there."
Melissa g (not verified) | Tue, 05/27/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
What a load of rubbish - men are portrayed as ignorant, clumsy, dim-witted and clueless. Men are CONSTANTLY portrayed as bad husbands and bad fathers, ignorant, rude and useless. That fact is always conveniently overlooked by women's lib feminazis.
ryan splint (not verified) | Mon, 05/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
tyson murphy (not verified) | Mon, 05/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Good female cartoon characters: 1. All of the girls in "Avatar" - Toph, Katara, even the villiainess Azula. Strong, individual, flawed and original. Kudos to the "Avatar" creators for respecting kids' intelligence. 2. Kim Possible - sometimes a little too slick and perfect, but she's still a true heroine and the productions values of this show are tops. 3. Dora the Explorer - frankly I find her a little creepy, but she's one female character that appeals to both genders (at least until the little boys in her audience are taught that watching a show starring a girl character is sissy). 4. Wanda of the "Fairly Oddparents" - at least until the later seasons, when she was turned into a sexist "nag" stereotype in a doomed and incomprehensible attempt at humor. 5. "The Mighty B" - as Spongebob rip-offs go, this is one of the better ones. And Amy Poehler does a great voice. So it seems that when it comes to female cartoon characters, there have been some successes and failures. I do think the issue is a valid one and that the solution may be for more women to get involved in all areas of animation. I don't think it's a matter of exclusion - that's a thing of the past. Opportunities are now open to women to get involved, but it's going to take some time for them to catch up.
Natalie (not verified) | Mon, 05/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I think the problem with female characters in TV toons is that cartoon writers either fear them (I'm serious - they fear to give them any flaws, lest they be called sexist) or are contemptuous of them (have you seen what they've done to poor Wanda of "Fairly Oddparents"? Shame on you, Butch Hartman!) So, as a result, you get girl characters who are bland and boring or who are abused and insulted in a disturbing "boy's club" sort of way. But there are bright spots: Raven and Starfire in "Teen Titans" are terrific characters, as is Gwen in "Ben 10 Alien Force", and of course there is Disney's wonderful Kim Possible. Also, in the new "Barnyard" series there is the hilariously sassy Bessie. So while there have been failures, there are also some success stories. As a female viewer, I would advise cartoon writers and producers to watch the above examples very carefully in order to learn what - and what NOT - to do.
Natalie Crandall (not verified) | Sun, 05/25/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thanks for this needed report, and special thanks to Geena Davis for her perception and action. Both girls and boys will benefit if the industry follows through.
anonymous (not verified) | Sun, 05/25/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Wait until my show is on the air. For the first time in what seems like history, the males are actually miniority on my cast. The core male cast lies in the heroes of the show, Curly, his brother, and his roommates. But I think the strong point is in his antagonists'-PC, all female villians with wildly different personalities...and they aren't romantic, screams for help types neither... ;-) I see what you're saying-and I've tooken strong notice, even if you go back to the 40's you see there's never quite been a 'Clarabelle Cow' short for every 'Goofy' short-or a 'Minnie Mouse' short for every time she was just tagging behind Mickey. They're always dasmals in distress but...it's not the media really. It breaks down into the directors and producers. What they want. I used to be frustrated with such bias until I realized. Hey that's what (insert name here) wrote, that's what (insert name here) animated, that's what (insert name here) wanted. Not the media in general. I think what's happened is-originality is falling off the face of the Earth, and way too strongly are the same brainless hacks not thinking, "Hmm..hey what if we replaced Wild E. Coyotee with say-a female coyetee instead?" But not me (and yes I'm a straight male). My brief for my series where it stands now? *A great action packed show, with storylines that vary between drama, comedy, and action. *A strong female cast. *No bias against what situations those female characters are caught in (that means female characters know what an anvil falling out of the sky is too..:-) I think TV deserves a better glass of Cardinal, and I'm gonna give it to 'em...I'll show ya!
Anthony Cromartie (not verified) | Sun, 05/25/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Oh my god... not THIS idiotic discussion again. Geena Davis needs to find something to do with her time instead of wasting her energy on a non-issue like this. She might as well open an institute with the intent of exposing that more boys like playing 'Cowboy' than girls do... or a study to prove that boys enjoy blowing up toy cars with firecrackers more than girls do.
anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 05/22/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.