Film Festival Submissions: Part 1 — The Agony and the Ecstasy

Sharon Katz talks with independent animators Patrick Smith and Signe Baumane about the agony and the ecstasy of entering one’s film into festivals.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

SK: Is it worth it? I mean all those hours of work completing the submission forms, and then the costs on top? What about investing the energy, time and money in your next film instead?

SB: Hmm… not right away. If you don’t have a genius one film that everybody wants then the festival game is something that you have to think as long term. You accumulate a wealth of people knowing your name and your work and then all of sudden a festival invites you to do a retrospective and they pay your way to some exotic unforgettable country. Yes, I did spend $700 this year at the post office, but I did get to go to Brazil for free and it was amazing!

As to balancing investment in festivals versus funding my next film, in the phase when I submit to festivals I don’t work on a new film. At one point I do stop submitting and start working on a new film, so that keeps everything in balance. I think...

SK: Are there festivals you really had hoped to get into and didn’t make the cut? How do you deal with the intense disappointment when that happens?

PS: It sucks to get rejected by Sundance, but it’s also a bit expected. That can be said for Cannes, Berlin, Toronto, Apen, Telluride… You just have to make the best film you can, and you can’t let yourself get too disappointed. People have distinct tastes, some people will love something that another group will hate.

SB: Another rule of mine that I forgot to mention is never submit to a festival that has rejected you in a past, with the exception of course Sundance, Annecy, etc. — the mega festivals. If a festival has rejected you once it means they don’t like your style or whatever and most likely they are going to reject your future films. Why waste your time, money and, most importantly, hope?

As to your question about dealing with the intense disappointment of rejection, hmm… I always wanted to get into Annecy, but learned to accept not being accepted. My films did get shown there — in special programs like “Erotic Animation” and Avoid Eye Contact, but that’s all. Am I going to kill myself over that? No.

You get used to rejection, its part of your occupation. If your skin is too soft, you can’t be in the business.

I’ve been on the other side too. When I programmed for a festival, I got a hate email from one of rejected filmmakers. He wrote, “Don’t you know how much work and money I have invested in the film! How dare you reject my film — it was accepted there and there — so it must be good!” His film indeed wasn’t all that bad. It’s just that I had a specific desire for the program and a certain criteria. His film just wasn’t fitting the program.

But I knew what he felt and now I know what programmers feel when they get hate emails from rejected filmmakers.

It isn’t easy for either of us. All we can do is to do the best we can and move on.

A lot of what will determine which festivals reply with a positive invitation is the type of film that you submit. American festivals seem to seek and screen very narrative films, ones that have a clear story in the Aristolian sense — a beginning, middle and end. More experimental or artistic films such as non-figurative films or films that focus more on technique seem to do better in European international animation, documentary and short films festivals which look at artistic and innovative criteria.


In Part 2 of this article I’ll address more practical issues. The chore of submitting can be daunting, so I’ll present valuable rules for submitting to festivals, recommendations to make the process more efficient and provide a number of important resources. There will be lists of our favorite festivals including specialty festivals, digital online submission engines, and much more. Catch you then.

Sharon Katz is an independent animator who lives and works in Ottawa. Her recently released animated short film, Slide, is now traveling more than she is.







Comments


First off Thanks to Sharon for writing an article about festival submissions. I myself am new to this area of animation, a recent grad from Columbia College Chicago's Animation program. For me I have been curious to know what the do's and don't of festival submissions are. I disagree with Signe Baumane about the not submitting to past rejection fest in that they do tend to have different people judging the festivals but all so agree with her on keeping a set of rules to submitting to festivals because of limited funds. Since now I am starting to pay back student loans. Keep the articles coming, I can't wait to read the second part of this article.
Kevin McLeod (not verified) | Wed, 02/01/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
Great piece. Nice to hear from a couple animators I respect on a subject worthy of more attention. Congrats to Patrick and Signe (and Michael Sporn) for their great work this past year. Looking forward to Part II.
Josh Staub (not verified) | Sun, 01/29/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
I completely agree with Patrick . Festivals are meeting points to recharge your creative energy. I recently finished my film "The tell tale heart" and the amount of work, time and money that went into making it is nothing compare with the work of putting the film in the festival circuit, a job by itself that often distract you as your main goal as a filmmaker: Making films. My advice is making the film for yourself and it will find an audience. Festivals rejections are the rule rather than the exception, and as a lack of other venue, festivals provide the best audiences you film could ever wish. Pure film and animation lovers.
raul garcia (not verified) | Wed, 01/25/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
Interesting comments by both filmmakers. Entering film festivals is a bit like a lottery. Sometimes you get in and lots of times you do not. I love Signe's hard line approach about eliminating festivals that consistently reject your work. I agree with Chris; keep trying with the big festivals that have a new selection committee every time. However, most of the smaller festivals cannot afford to bring in a panel of jurors and they are programmed by a just a few people. I was rejected from the Holland Animation Festival seven times and I am friends with the director, Gerben Schermer, who is a great guy! I stopped entering his festival six films ago.
Joanna Priestley (not verified) | Wed, 01/25/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
I have to disagree with Signe too! The more the merrier I say, I have no problem with a festival rejecting my film, it doesn't suite them that's all, besides all my films are different so if they didn't like the last one they may well like the next, and there might be a different selection committee anyway. Also my aim is to get my film seen in as many different countries as possible, I'll never get to go to the festivals anyway but so what! In fact my only concern with a festival is - will they be able to return the tape/print and will they try to charge me for returning it? I'm helping to organise a festival too now, so I'm suddenly seeing it from 'the other side' the masses of voluntary hours put in along side your day job, the great films that just don't fit the theme, or aims of the festival, too many films for the timeslots we have, too many of the same type of film. Because we have restrictions too, we have to make a good programme and get the audience in and give them a good selection and make them want to come back next year.
Lucy Lee (not verified) | Wed, 01/25/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
Thank you very much for this article series. I have a student film that I've been submitting to festivals, and sometimes I have a hard time dealing with the the endless stream of rejections and disappointments. To learn that animators I respect and admire have to deal with the same garbage as a greenhorn like me is strangely comforting. I look forward to the next installment. Thank you again for the free therapy!
Joanna Davidovich (not verified) | Fri, 01/20/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
Nice piece. I've spoken with Signe about this before, but I totally disagree with her belief that if she has a film rejected once by a festival it's not worth sending it again because they clearly don't like her style. That's absolute nonsense primarily because MOST of the festivals have pre-selection committees that change every year. So you can't say that one rejection means eternal rejection. And in cases like Ottawa where the selection is done 'in-house'...I can tell you that I don't have a list that I keep for rejected filmmakers. I don't have a rule that says.."well, I rejected them before, so why bother looking at their film." Sometimes animators make good films, sometimes they make shit films. Sometimes I make great decisions, sometime I make shit ones. I don't think other animators should follow Signe's logic on that particular issue. cr
Chris Robinson (not verified) | Fri, 01/20/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
"veve lal lal aguj aboseba"