Model Sheets vs. Business Models: How Independent Animators Work Within the System

Joe Strike sets out to find out how independent animators find work within the system while keeping their independence.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

“Back then it was possible to get a pre-sale based on your presentation, but that’s happening less and less now. There’s no low-hanging fruit anymore. You basically have to have the show in production, have your financing in place and show the network at least finished footage if not actual episodes before they’ll buy it. It’s a challenging business model, but for the right people with the right skill sets and the right approach — there is opportunity to make a good show that can last and last. The holy grail for the independent producer is to come up with a Power Rangers or a Ninja Turtles.”

Even though his studio is Tom Warburton’s Kids Next Door home base, Curious Pictures’ exec producer Richard Winkler also endorses the co-production route. “We like a mix of different business models. The secret ingredient to whatever success we’ve had is diversity. We like to keep our eggs in multiple baskets.

“In a co-production deal, usually half the production budget comes from the sale of U.S. TV and home video rights, and the rest of the world makes up the other half.” Winkler works with a Canadian production partner to take advantage of that country’s production subsidies: “Their system is complicated and fairly restrictive, but set up right it can generate significant production financing for a country of thirty million people. You have to deal with an elaborate point system based on what country’s passport is in your director or writer or editor’s pocket, and you’re also required to spend 75% of your budget in the country.”

Unlike Antonucci, Winkler doesn’t look at working with production partners as inevitably leading to creative conflicts. “I was warned about that going into the process, but picking the right partners is like casting a film — casting is everything. If you pick the wrong partners who have suggestions in conflict with your vision, then you have a problem. If you and your partners are creatively in sync, then it works.”

Curious has worked with a single partner, Canada’s Blueprint Ent. on two projects to date: the 2D Hey Joel! (currently on VH-1’s shelf) and the stop frame sketch comedy The Wrong Coast for The Movie Network. “We have a strong history of mixed media — doing things in more than one format. Most of the cable networks with studios in L.A. are primarily 2D; we can do mixed media as well as 2D. That’s part of our collaborative approach: we’re not taking money out of their studio, we’re doing something they might not necessarily be the best at.

“On a certain level we’re competing with the networks’ in-house studios. They have a built-in incentive to feed their existing capacity and keep their development departments busy, but I prefer to look at it as an opportunity to collaborate, to take projects to them that we like or vice-versa, and develop them together from a very early stage.”

One long-time industry observer/player — who prefers to go nameless for the moment — takes a more acerbic view of the current power relationship between the networks and producers, particularly as to how it impacts on a show’s aftermarket: “Way back in the day Normal Lear said ‘There’s no such thing as independent producers — only dependent producers,’” this observer notes. “It’s very frustrating to be in the business today because the networks control absolutely the amount the pay you and the handling of all rights post network.

“I have a very fair deal with the people I’m in business with, but if they did not absolutely control the product, I might be able to do it differently and perhaps more effectively from my perspective. It’s very frustrating if you have some original marketing ideas that don’t fit into their strategy of the week. As wonderful as the often the people in the networks are, they’re wonderful from the standpoint of serfdom.







Comments


best article-yet about current animation MONOPLIES and how badly "consessions' need to adapt to every financial-political situation. after six years of trying to figure out how an individual -creating origional concepts-must 'operate'...one must come to the conclusion that 'plimpton' style operations(one creator-busting his-her- ass ,18 hours a day) are only for the 'work -a -holics'and type "A" personalities. this article re-inforces my continued idea-approach regarding 'marketing' of origional toon concepts.it no longer matters if your concept is VIABLE...and all that matters is that the lowest of 'hopefulls'(and YOU number in the thousands) atempting to make any money in the toon biz, must turn to self publishing-via kids books-comics- licensing products(make-sell them yourself)and hope the big "TOON GOONS" sign you-on? then, these independant studios that can keep; 'the right distance from the sun' -BARF!!! will be working with you-the lone-creator-at the bottom of the 'dung-heap'...of toon -wannabeez...??? as a 'lone -toon-creator' you must keep hope forever-burning(like our ultimate hero"PLIMPTON") who-even-now,plimpton....goes ; begging for a chance to be working for the big toon goons? did they finally 'beat you down'-BILL? are YOU being made 'an example" of what happens to single-creators-who attempt to market their ideas,without 'begging'(please buy out my concept!) for a 'crumb' ,from the big toon goons throne? how sad...that our only (go-it alone)hero has succumbed to the network (are YOU being made the example?) bullies-who obviously have a greedy(proprietary) strangle-hold on cartoons! and how pitifull is -it.... when american animation-for hire studios need to "BOW"...to the "QUEEN"... of canadian-subsidized "DEALS" that require all sorts of conditions-then require vancouver-kanooks (only)canadians-create the animations??!!! thats 'outsourcing'! seven years ago i was sent a 'contract' which i was required to 'sign'-before i was allowed to approach cartoon network,but (wisley) i never got involved-because their contract stated-somthing like this ; "of course-we may be doing the exact same concept that you are working on...." and this says it-all,so why is this article any different than the past-day sitiation? nothing has changed-just the money-hungry 'creatives'-as they are politley and carefully avoiding the real issue....and that involves 'fair trade'. this pisses me-off to no end,and i am determined to launch my own concept...FAR-FAR from the "SUN" or these 'son of a bitches'who think they can dominate the toon biz,with corprate-big money brutality! in business-one knows when they are taking a 'beating' ,and no one said YOU can not fight-back.i see a lot of toon'prostitutes' who will do anything for a few bucks,just to be doing cartoons. sad-indeed. DAWK
dale 'dawk' mc farlane (not verified) | Mon, 07/05/2004 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.