Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All the Rights to Your Own Art

Mark Simon is mad as hell and, in this month's "Mind Your Business," he tells you why you should be too.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld
Mark Simon.
Mark Simon

As you know, I usually handle the subjects in my articles with a sense of humor. That is not the case this month. I find nothing funny about the new Orphan Works legislation that is before Congress.

In fact, it PISSES ME OFF!

As an artist, you have to read this article or you could lose everything you've ever created!

An Orphaned Work is any creative work of art where the artist or copyright owner has released their copyright, whether on purpose, by passage of time, or by lack of proper registration. In the same way that an orphaned child loses the protection of his or her parents, your creative work can become an orphan for others to use without your permission.

If you don't like to read long articles, you will miss incredibly important information that will affect the rest of your career as an artist. You should at least skip to the end to find the link for a fantastic interview with the Illustrators' Partnership about how you are about to lose ownership of your own artwork.

Currently, you don't have to register your artwork to own the copyright. You own a copyright as soon as you create something. International law also supports this. Right now, registration allows you to sue for damages, in addition to fair value.

What makes me so MAD about this new legislation is that it legalizes THEFT! The only people who benefit from this are those who want to make use of our creative works without paying for them and large companies who will run the new private copyright registries.

These registries are companies that you would be forced to pay in order to register every single image, photo, sketch or creative work.

It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense.

This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free.

In short, if Congress passes this law, YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!

Why is this allowed to happen? APATHY and MONEY.

Artists have apathy and corporations have money.

We need to be heard in order to protect our incomes, our creations and our careers. GET OFF YOUR ASS!

That means writing letters to our congressmen and representatives. That means voicing your opinion about how we need copyright protection, as we've had since 1976, that protects everything we create from the moment we create it. This is the case around the world.

However, an Orphan Works bill is also in the works in Europe. I was speaking recently with Roger Dean, the famed artist of the Yes album covers, and he is greatly concerned with what will happen if Orphan Works bills become law.

"This will devastate the livelihood of artists, photographers and designers in a number of ways," Dean says. "That at the behest of a few hugely rich corporations who got rich by selling art that they played no part in the making of, the U.S. and U.K. governments are changing the copyright laws to protect the infringer instead of the creator. This is unjust, culturally destructive and commercial lunacy. This will not just hurt millions of artists around the world.

"On the other side of the coin, what argument will a U.S. court have with a Chinese company that insists it did its research in China and found nothing? If the cost of this is onerous for a U.S.-based artist, what will it be like for artists and small businesses in emergent economies?"

If an artist whose work is as famous as Roger Dean's is concerned with this legislation, it should be of great concern for all of us.

The people, associations and companies behind the Orphan Works bill state that orphaned works have no value. If that were true, no one would want them. However, these same companies DO WANT your work, they just don't want to pay for it. If someone wants something, IT HAS VALUE. It's pretty simple.

Some major art and photography associations, or I should say, the managers of the associations, support this bill. The reason they support it is that they will operate some of the registries and stand to make a lot of money. Some have already been given millions of dollars by the Library of Congress. Follow the money and you will see why some groups support this bill of legalized theft of everything you have ever created.







Comments


As always, it is all about the money. Our government has sold almost all of our rights because of "big business" profits. Our government is one of the most corrupt in the world; they do NOTHING because it's the "right" thing to do or in the best interest of the citizens. They would rather sell out the rights given by that sacred document the Constitution than say no to a few bucks of graft or some golf boondoggle. I am of the firm opinion that this sword, if brought to bear, will cut deeply in both directions. Not only will we, the artists, suffer but the registry company(s) will suffer also; I will make sure I do my part. It's been my observation that you don't screw over highly creative people; they can make you pay in spades - in ways you never anticipated.
Ricky Jackson (not verified) | Thu, 04/24/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This is just unconscionable. There would be no reason to create a law like that unless it was to steal artist's work. It's not broken, it works like it does now, the only reason to change it is to force artists to register their work. Who are they to force an artist to register their work? The bad thing is: once this legislation is on the books and an administration is established it is NEVER EVER going away. And they count on artist apathy to not respond, or not respond every time. I'm appalled that main stream media does not report [to my knowledge] about this and that the academic world does not howl in protest in this all too obvious attempt to steal the work of artists. Is there really nothing big interests can't take away from people? The time is more than overdue, people. We -need- a revolution. The system needs to be purged. I will be writing my political representatives. This is an assault on free expression and the rights of artists. And the gall to say that 'it has no value'. We'll take it, because it has no value. And, hey, what do you know: now that 'we' have it, all of a sudden, it DOES have value. Who'da thunk! Revolution! We need revolution. The 1789 kind.
jorge Goreman (not verified) | Wed, 04/23/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Concerned Artists should check this out. This is OUTRAGEOUS !!! http://www.furafterdark.com/tour2.html
Concerned Art Student (not verified) | Wed, 04/23/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS’ PARTNERSHIP April 23,2008 Today the House and Senate sent us draft copies of the new Orphan Works Act of 2008. They haven’t officially released it yet, but we’ve been told the Senate will do so this week. A quick analysis confirms our worst fears and our early warnings. If these proposals are enacted into law, all the work you have ever done or will do could be orphaned and exposed to commercial infringement from the moment you create it. You’ve probably already heard Mark Simon’s webcast interview with Brad Holland. If not, please listen to it at: http://www.sellyourtvconceptnow.com/orphan.html. Then forget the spin you’ve heard from backers of this bill. This radical proposal, now pending before Congress, could cost you your past and future copyrights. The Illustrators’ Partnership is currently working with our attorney - in concert with the other 12 groups in the American Society of Illustrators Partnership to have our voices – and yours - heard in Congress. We’ll keep you posted regarding how you can do your part. Please forward this information to every creative person and group you know. Mr. Holland and Mr. Simon have given their permission for this audio file to be copied and transferred and replayed. For additional information about Orphan Works developments, go to the IPA Orphan Works Resource Page for Artists http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/01_topics/article.php?searchterm=... If you received our mail as a forwarded message, and wish to be added to our mailing list, email us at: illustratorspartnership@cnymail.com Place "Add Name" in the subject line, and provide your name and the email address you want used in the message area.
Roberto Ortiz (not verified) | Wed, 04/23/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This Simon guy is either a MORON, a LIAR, or just completely misinformed. There is no Copyright Bill before Congress at this time. See this article (which is backed by resources, unlike Mr. Simon's hack of an article...) http://maradydd.livejournal.com/374886.html Mr. Simon get off the internet - there's already too much crappy junk now...
Michael Tumey (not verified) | Tue, 04/22/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
For anyone who think this issue died in 2006, here is the official .pdf of Congressional testimony given March 13, 2008! http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/Adler080313.pdf
Glenn Paterson (not verified) | Mon, 04/21/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Capitilism is a scary thing, it works well when it works, but our system is far too easily manipulated. The sad thing is, we can all scream and protest and in the end, the money wins. That's a fact of life. We create because we can, and to share that gift with the world. That has to be THE REASON you create, and nothing more. Any compensation acheived is a bonus.
'the lone redneck' Todd Cass (not verified) | Sun, 04/20/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
alrighty.... now we artist's will be treated to the joy of creative piracy with no recourse but to register our works on a data base that does jack for you without proving parent status of your creative babies in a court room. It's all about censorship. Artists make a colourful target for totalitarian regimes... australia has anti-sedition laws in place. the advent of this miscarriage of creative justice will facilitate the instigation of punitive financial retribution for the privelidge to express yourself. Artworks critical of powerful/influential bodies will be registered by those bodies, pixelcode technology will scan images in media for violations of adopted artworks..... if you persist in demonstrating/expressing your political views by reproducing your work that is now in adverse possession, you will be breaking the law, and will be up for fiscal/legal drama... If you have the option available to register your artwork, and do so, you will have formerly declared yourself as the producer of the work that can then be deemed as seditionist- anti status quo, and will, as such be held legally accountable for it....you won't be able to deny authorship and will be fodder for the Wackenhut system of factoryworking imprisonment that the ceo's of Haliburton have envisioned for dissenters of the future newold world order. yes the litigious pen is mightier than the word, and the paintbrush is a prohibited weapon of mass distraction that needs to be patented by media moguls to curtail its deployment on the battlefield of consciousness. decorate your canvas shields and polish your sculptured clubs, the battle-lines of thought have been drawn, and its an ugly neopostmodernist conflict between abstract democracy's surrealist imposition of tyranny over the sovereignty of individual thought and expression.
matt (not verified) | Sat, 04/19/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
It would be helpful if there were a petition key on this site like so many other informational sites offer. Where you could send Congress an email about your concerns would make it more effective and increase the letters to the law makers many times over. Best, Frances Morey
Frances Morey (not verified) | Sat, 04/19/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This is what happens when criminals have take over our country. Theft will be made legal. If we let them get away with this, where does this madness stop?
Darren Whiters (not verified) | Sat, 04/19/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.