Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All the Rights to Your Own Art

Mark Simon is mad as hell and, in this month's "Mind Your Business," he tells you why you should be too.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld
Mark Simon.
Mark Simon

As you know, I usually handle the subjects in my articles with a sense of humor. That is not the case this month. I find nothing funny about the new Orphan Works legislation that is before Congress.

In fact, it PISSES ME OFF!

As an artist, you have to read this article or you could lose everything you've ever created!

An Orphaned Work is any creative work of art where the artist or copyright owner has released their copyright, whether on purpose, by passage of time, or by lack of proper registration. In the same way that an orphaned child loses the protection of his or her parents, your creative work can become an orphan for others to use without your permission.

If you don't like to read long articles, you will miss incredibly important information that will affect the rest of your career as an artist. You should at least skip to the end to find the link for a fantastic interview with the Illustrators' Partnership about how you are about to lose ownership of your own artwork.

Currently, you don't have to register your artwork to own the copyright. You own a copyright as soon as you create something. International law also supports this. Right now, registration allows you to sue for damages, in addition to fair value.

What makes me so MAD about this new legislation is that it legalizes THEFT! The only people who benefit from this are those who want to make use of our creative works without paying for them and large companies who will run the new private copyright registries.

These registries are companies that you would be forced to pay in order to register every single image, photo, sketch or creative work.

It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense.

This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free.

In short, if Congress passes this law, YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!

Why is this allowed to happen? APATHY and MONEY.

Artists have apathy and corporations have money.

We need to be heard in order to protect our incomes, our creations and our careers. GET OFF YOUR ASS!

That means writing letters to our congressmen and representatives. That means voicing your opinion about how we need copyright protection, as we've had since 1976, that protects everything we create from the moment we create it. This is the case around the world.

However, an Orphan Works bill is also in the works in Europe. I was speaking recently with Roger Dean, the famed artist of the Yes album covers, and he is greatly concerned with what will happen if Orphan Works bills become law.

"This will devastate the livelihood of artists, photographers and designers in a number of ways," Dean says. "That at the behest of a few hugely rich corporations who got rich by selling art that they played no part in the making of, the U.S. and U.K. governments are changing the copyright laws to protect the infringer instead of the creator. This is unjust, culturally destructive and commercial lunacy. This will not just hurt millions of artists around the world.

"On the other side of the coin, what argument will a U.S. court have with a Chinese company that insists it did its research in China and found nothing? If the cost of this is onerous for a U.S.-based artist, what will it be like for artists and small businesses in emergent economies?"

If an artist whose work is as famous as Roger Dean's is concerned with this legislation, it should be of great concern for all of us.

The people, associations and companies behind the Orphan Works bill state that orphaned works have no value. If that were true, no one would want them. However, these same companies DO WANT your work, they just don't want to pay for it. If someone wants something, IT HAS VALUE. It's pretty simple.

Some major art and photography associations, or I should say, the managers of the associations, support this bill. The reason they support it is that they will operate some of the registries and stand to make a lot of money. Some have already been given millions of dollars by the Library of Congress. Follow the money and you will see why some groups support this bill of legalized theft of everything you have ever created.







Comments


In 1994 I discovered that the Disney company was releasing a television series called Gargoyles that was surprisingly similar to a screenplay and character line that was developed and marketed many years before. I sued and lost, the judge refusing to honor my copyrights or acknowledge character similarities. I believe my character designs and my copyrights were stolen and that years of work were thrown away. My rights were not protected even with copyrights and a lawyer. The judge refused to believe that a corporation would do anything dishonest. Our hard work cannot be stolen. FIGHT THIS FOR ALL ARTIST, PRESENT AND FUTURE! Please e-mail with any comments
Joseph Tomasini (not verified) | Mon, 06/16/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I started to read this article, and the implications are despicable, even to me a rather non-artist. I dabble in photography, but would never consider selling it. I play with photoshop, but hardly consider anything I create to be art, though I am certain it fits the description. I'm also Canadian, and as such safe from the implications of U.S. and U.K. legislations, in the short term. I'm not so naive as to believe that if given an inch, the business and corporate end of things will run with it for the mile. Now to the nitty gritty. I'm a computer *ahem* enthusiast. Open Source is one of the most beautiful things in the world to me, as are the free and open unto themselves corporations that are there to back it. Look at the GPL and FSF that came about to protect and fascilitate the works of soft-ware developers who didn't want to hide everything away from the world, because let's face it. Well written code truly is a work of art. This brings to mind the worst-case scenario, the legislation gets passed and to be "your" work, it must be registered as "your" work. Now I can already name one free place to license your works. Creative Commons, I HIGHLY suggest reading what they're all about. http://creativecommons.org/about/ And that's great, if you're actively and comercially using those works, especially on somewhere as widely available as the WWW. Why should it be necessary to license every work though? And you're right, it shouldn't. Even with great, and free open-source tools developed to help publish on Creative Commons Such as: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcPublisher Reducing the work-load of setting up your Cc License, it's an atrocity to think that every time you have an original thought you should have to run off to a computer and register that thought! Also the current extent of the Cc's power has it's limitations, however if a movement such as those that created the Open Source Software licenses could push for two key components behind the power of an established and trusted NPO then even after the worst case scenario there could be hope. Again I only use Cc as an example, as it has established itself already. Two things need to happen, one an NPO needs to start fighting now, before the possibility of the bill, to be included in the arrangement. Two, someone with clout (An established, or newly recognized but large organization) needs to push that there be a centrallized database, even if it's just one that connects the decentralized ones to facillitate the ability to reference and find registered works. Such an organization should have it's Policies reviewed and laid out to help protect the rights of the individual. That ownership of original work by original owner is sufficient grounds to contest an assumed "orphan" that has been falaciously registered. It would need to be capable of encompassing multiple media types, photo, video, audio, literary. Most of all, it would need to be completely transparent in it's operations and available to the people it is conceived to protect. If it worked for software, it can work for art.
L Parker (not verified) | Mon, 05/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Yes.. this is awful.. but i do not see a photo credit under your head shot Peace, Jennifer www.jenniferesperanza.com
Jennifer Esperanza (not verified) | Sat, 05/24/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
When are we all going to wake up to the fact that the people who are creating these laws and passing this kind of legislation are nothing more than common criminals and extortionists. How long is it going to take to bring these people to justice. They should all be rotting in prison. I have always been told that extortion was a crime and if you or I did some of the things they are doing we would find ourselves in a world of trouble. If anyone ever wants to start a class action suit with the international justice system against these criminals who are supposedly running this country and corporations you can count me in. I don't consider laws and legislation passed by criminals to be valid in any way, shape or form.
Fiore DeRosa (not verified) | Wed, 05/21/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I hope artists/all creatives are listening and I think that a demonstration would be a great idea personally. But, if we can't do that, we can write our reps and tell our friends/fellow artists. People need to know the scope of the opposition to this. Too many people are "waiting to see" - all I want to know is what are you going to do if this is right and you're stuck with it? do you think that these multibillion (with a B) dollar companies are going to give us a "do over" - it'll be too little, too late. Don't let people like Mark fight this battle alone. Get involved now, before its too late. Valorie
Valorie Wilson (not verified) | Mon, 05/19/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Hi, Robert Genn (www.robertgenn.com) asked me to pass this along to you, It's his letter on the The Orphan Works Bill, reader responses and live comments: http://clicks.robertgenn.com/mickey-mouse.php All the best, Michelle Moore Robert Genn Studio www.painterskeys.com
Michelle Moore (not verified) | Thu, 05/15/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
URGENT Sign petition here: http://www.furafterdark.com/tour2.html Show your SUPPORT!
Jarred Jamesworth Jr. (not verified) | Thu, 05/08/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This would be devastating, especially to the local artists without funds to register. Those of us who sell reproductions of our work would lose all of that income. I, for one, depend on that income, since originals are at the higher end of the price scale, and my reproductions sell rather well. Having been in the art business for thirty years, I have many contacts, and will encourage them to react against this legislation. Registering all of our images is a joke even if we had the money. Does anyone in congress know what it takes to create theese images? Are we to predetermine which might be popular and register only those? All of it? That figure would be astronomical for most serious artists.
Carole Brender (not verified) | Thu, 05/08/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Any way you can write a letter where people can add their signatures and post it on this site? It may be a very effective way to collect really impressive numbers. Julia
Julia Michry (not verified) | Mon, 05/05/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Quite the bogus bill. How do they intend to keep this in line with international copyright law?
Erik Mumm (not verified) | Sun, 05/04/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.