Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All the Rights to Your Own Art

Mark Simon is mad as hell and, in this month's "Mind Your Business," he tells you why you should be too.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld
Mark Simon.
Mark Simon

As you know, I usually handle the subjects in my articles with a sense of humor. That is not the case this month. I find nothing funny about the new Orphan Works legislation that is before Congress.

In fact, it PISSES ME OFF!

As an artist, you have to read this article or you could lose everything you've ever created!

An Orphaned Work is any creative work of art where the artist or copyright owner has released their copyright, whether on purpose, by passage of time, or by lack of proper registration. In the same way that an orphaned child loses the protection of his or her parents, your creative work can become an orphan for others to use without your permission.

If you don't like to read long articles, you will miss incredibly important information that will affect the rest of your career as an artist. You should at least skip to the end to find the link for a fantastic interview with the Illustrators' Partnership about how you are about to lose ownership of your own artwork.

Currently, you don't have to register your artwork to own the copyright. You own a copyright as soon as you create something. International law also supports this. Right now, registration allows you to sue for damages, in addition to fair value.

What makes me so MAD about this new legislation is that it legalizes THEFT! The only people who benefit from this are those who want to make use of our creative works without paying for them and large companies who will run the new private copyright registries.

These registries are companies that you would be forced to pay in order to register every single image, photo, sketch or creative work.

It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense.

This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free.

In short, if Congress passes this law, YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!

Why is this allowed to happen? APATHY and MONEY.

Artists have apathy and corporations have money.

We need to be heard in order to protect our incomes, our creations and our careers. GET OFF YOUR ASS!

That means writing letters to our congressmen and representatives. That means voicing your opinion about how we need copyright protection, as we've had since 1976, that protects everything we create from the moment we create it. This is the case around the world.

However, an Orphan Works bill is also in the works in Europe. I was speaking recently with Roger Dean, the famed artist of the Yes album covers, and he is greatly concerned with what will happen if Orphan Works bills become law.

"This will devastate the livelihood of artists, photographers and designers in a number of ways," Dean says. "That at the behest of a few hugely rich corporations who got rich by selling art that they played no part in the making of, the U.S. and U.K. governments are changing the copyright laws to protect the infringer instead of the creator. This is unjust, culturally destructive and commercial lunacy. This will not just hurt millions of artists around the world.

"On the other side of the coin, what argument will a U.S. court have with a Chinese company that insists it did its research in China and found nothing? If the cost of this is onerous for a U.S.-based artist, what will it be like for artists and small businesses in emergent economies?"

If an artist whose work is as famous as Roger Dean's is concerned with this legislation, it should be of great concern for all of us.

The people, associations and companies behind the Orphan Works bill state that orphaned works have no value. If that were true, no one would want them. However, these same companies DO WANT your work, they just don't want to pay for it. If someone wants something, IT HAS VALUE. It's pretty simple.

Some major art and photography associations, or I should say, the managers of the associations, support this bill. The reason they support it is that they will operate some of the registries and stand to make a lot of money. Some have already been given millions of dollars by the Library of Congress. Follow the money and you will see why some groups support this bill of legalized theft of everything you have ever created.







Comments


http://maradydd.livejournal.com/374886.html ^^some good info on that link. Always good to hear another point of view. http://www.trendyink.net/blog
zOnk oNe (not verified) | Fri, 05/02/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This Orphan Bill is reminiscent of something happening in education. Recently, students in my class have been required to upload 'artifacts', their written creations, to a state registry called Foliotek. Not only are they forced to do this, if they want credit, but they also have to pay for the privilege - once every year.
Thomas Stroud (not verified) | Fri, 05/02/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I VOTE NO on this ACT Passing
Rosina Lamberti (not verified) | Fri, 05/02/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
And slowly they take away your freedom in the name of business. Soon they will have a thought tax.
D K (not verified) | Wed, 04/30/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
OMG no! We need to sign some banner to this madness! Omg if we don't do something the goverment will cheat us out! AHHHHHHHHHH! ARTIST MUST BAN TOGETHER TO PROTECT WHATS OURS! Our own art is what seperates our talents! To make us different. If we let them do that then anyone can make money off our work! If you aren't an artist then think about. Would you like it if your friend who is one be cheated by someone you know! Some of us make a living off art. PLEASE HELP SAVE OUR ART! S.O.A! Join! E-mail me please!
Annika Nelson (not verified) | Mon, 04/28/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I have tried to post in a certain forum (*whose name I cannot list or be banned possibly!) But I offered to start a sign in petition to do for the purpose of printing and mailing to all congressional and senate representatives. But the apathy is just plain disgusting. I have spoken also to Colin Gerbode, Technical Head, wondeful man at Smith-Micro, the company who took over former company Curious Labs/E-Frontier, makers of Poser/Shade/Manga and others programs. He circulated the info to others at the company. Since they make several products used by many graphics oriented people, I can only hope they are on board to help all artists in this endeavor. On a personal note. I am a budding 3D artist with 2 gallery sales and several on line sales under my belt. But this is so Orwellian in scope and purpose I feel like nothing I can do will be of any consequence! But I am on board, I will do what I can. regards, Ariana Baer
Ariana Baer (not verified) | Mon, 04/28/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
The bills introduced on April 24, 2008 are are * S. 2913, the Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008 (SENATE) * H.R. 5889: The Orphan Works Act of 2008 (HOUSE) Look them up! And for those who insist on not accepting reality and still re-post the blog: "Six Misconceptions About Orphaned Works" Guess what, SHE WAS WRONG. She even admitted the existence of the LAW on http://maradydd.livejournal.com/376191.html
Roberto Ortiz (not verified) | Mon, 04/28/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
WHOA!! That is SO unfair!! That pisses me off, too!! I found the link to this article through a journal entry of a friend of mine on www.deviantart.com and it pisses him off!! SO UNFAIR!! To visit my art page, go to http://littlechibi.deviantart.com
Kitty (not verified) | Sat, 04/26/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Looking forward to the retraction.
Tim Drage (not verified) | Thu, 04/24/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
dopamine (not verified) | Thu, 04/24/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.