Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All the Rights to Your Own Art

Mark Simon is mad as hell and, in this month's "Mind Your Business," he tells you why you should be too.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld
Mark Simon.
Mark Simon

As you know, I usually handle the subjects in my articles with a sense of humor. That is not the case this month. I find nothing funny about the new Orphan Works legislation that is before Congress.

In fact, it PISSES ME OFF!

As an artist, you have to read this article or you could lose everything you've ever created!

An Orphaned Work is any creative work of art where the artist or copyright owner has released their copyright, whether on purpose, by passage of time, or by lack of proper registration. In the same way that an orphaned child loses the protection of his or her parents, your creative work can become an orphan for others to use without your permission.

If you don't like to read long articles, you will miss incredibly important information that will affect the rest of your career as an artist. You should at least skip to the end to find the link for a fantastic interview with the Illustrators' Partnership about how you are about to lose ownership of your own artwork.

Currently, you don't have to register your artwork to own the copyright. You own a copyright as soon as you create something. International law also supports this. Right now, registration allows you to sue for damages, in addition to fair value.

What makes me so MAD about this new legislation is that it legalizes THEFT! The only people who benefit from this are those who want to make use of our creative works without paying for them and large companies who will run the new private copyright registries.

These registries are companies that you would be forced to pay in order to register every single image, photo, sketch or creative work.

It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense.

This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free.

In short, if Congress passes this law, YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!

Why is this allowed to happen? APATHY and MONEY.

Artists have apathy and corporations have money.

We need to be heard in order to protect our incomes, our creations and our careers. GET OFF YOUR ASS!

That means writing letters to our congressmen and representatives. That means voicing your opinion about how we need copyright protection, as we've had since 1976, that protects everything we create from the moment we create it. This is the case around the world.

However, an Orphan Works bill is also in the works in Europe. I was speaking recently with Roger Dean, the famed artist of the Yes album covers, and he is greatly concerned with what will happen if Orphan Works bills become law.

"This will devastate the livelihood of artists, photographers and designers in a number of ways," Dean says. "That at the behest of a few hugely rich corporations who got rich by selling art that they played no part in the making of, the U.S. and U.K. governments are changing the copyright laws to protect the infringer instead of the creator. This is unjust, culturally destructive and commercial lunacy. This will not just hurt millions of artists around the world.

"On the other side of the coin, what argument will a U.S. court have with a Chinese company that insists it did its research in China and found nothing? If the cost of this is onerous for a U.S.-based artist, what will it be like for artists and small businesses in emergent economies?"

If an artist whose work is as famous as Roger Dean's is concerned with this legislation, it should be of great concern for all of us.

The people, associations and companies behind the Orphan Works bill state that orphaned works have no value. If that were true, no one would want them. However, these same companies DO WANT your work, they just don't want to pay for it. If someone wants something, IT HAS VALUE. It's pretty simple.

Some major art and photography associations, or I should say, the managers of the associations, support this bill. The reason they support it is that they will operate some of the registries and stand to make a lot of money. Some have already been given millions of dollars by the Library of Congress. Follow the money and you will see why some groups support this bill of legalized theft of everything you have ever created.







Comments


WTF Get to the fucking point!! Write 3 sentences with tye issue NOT 3 pages.. What the Fuck are yu saying???????????????????????
ZZZ Z (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thank you for informing us of this; as an artist and a photographer, I wrote angry letters to all of my congressmen.
Anna Fleming (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Are corporations like Disney/ABC, Dreamworks, et al. doing anything to help protect their much needed creative staff from legislation like this? Is it possible for the creative people to organize themselves into some kind of general strike to show some kind of solidarity on this issue? Just a couple quick (not fully thought out) questions that came to mind as I read this article. Shawn
Shawn Webster (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This is not only an attempt to screw over creative minds all over America; this act is criminal in it's nature alone. It's unconstitutional as it not only harms potential business but cripples our freedom of speech to an extent. This is not a bill, a law, or an act. This is an injustice trying to take life, born from greedy businessmen who don't know the emotion that comes from losing something that you make.
Keith (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thank you SO MUCH for this article!!! I have posted journals in my various online art communities I am active in to spread the word, and I have asked friends to do the same. I will also spread word of this through my school, The Art Institute of Washington. -Jen D
Jennifer D. (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
As far as that congressman who says its your "own fault for not getting it licensed", apparently he's forgetting younger artists (such as I), are unlikely to have any sort of money for registry.
Miranda G. (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This personally pisses me off royally!And i know this will happen.But what will the artist community do lost their rights? this is completely against everything that being an artist is about, I mean I also do tattoos and if i draw you up a tatt and give you the design i will not let anyone else get the damn thing because it's the right to have an original. I mean if sombody else copied that tatt not only the client getts pissed but the artist that created that tatt you know....And this will be the end of that and many paople want to have originals...and if they find out that it's not they get pissed, I know from expreince. I personally will write whomever I have to to stop this thing from being enabled to ruin the artist's rights and originality. For one everybody should have that right, but since freedom isn't free. I guess rights aren't either, am I right I mean the goverment has gone to shit. And us the americans have let it i mean $4.00 per gallon and $2.45 for a dozen eggs $5.00 for a gallon of milk I mean look at what the world has become.....No original art there's no freedom, no rights, and no religion like what the hell this is the shittist thing since you had to stop riding horses to town...Common people stop the treachery already. Get a grip and stop the government from this i mean. If 1/4 the people in america wrote to stop this shit there's no way it would happen but you know what??? We're going to let it happen because we cannot stand together a kill this beast that is taking over anymore!!!!
micheal meese (not verified) | Fri, 04/11/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
does this effect the artwork of Canadians also??
(not verified) | Fri, 04/11/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
your forgetting about creative commons. government sanctioned without government control. your still protected all you have to do is slap the right CC symbol up and your good.
Sam Given (not verified) | Fri, 04/11/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Hey Mark, This is artist Jon Hul. There may be one effective solution to this...PETTITION! A pettition should be created immediately (using a PDF form), and emailed to the hundred's of thousand's of exsisting artists, making them all aware of the heck is going on with our government on this particular subject!!..."Orphaned Art"...bullshit!! If anybody reads my comment, please elaborate on it, and/or make more suggestions....jump on this now!! Very concerned, and hope everybody else is too!! Jon Hul 04/11/08
Jon Hul (not verified) | Fri, 04/11/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.