Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All the Rights to Your Own Art

Mark Simon is mad as hell and, in this month's "Mind Your Business," he tells you why you should be too.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld
Mark Simon.
Mark Simon

As you know, I usually handle the subjects in my articles with a sense of humor. That is not the case this month. I find nothing funny about the new Orphan Works legislation that is before Congress.

In fact, it PISSES ME OFF!

As an artist, you have to read this article or you could lose everything you've ever created!

An Orphaned Work is any creative work of art where the artist or copyright owner has released their copyright, whether on purpose, by passage of time, or by lack of proper registration. In the same way that an orphaned child loses the protection of his or her parents, your creative work can become an orphan for others to use without your permission.

If you don't like to read long articles, you will miss incredibly important information that will affect the rest of your career as an artist. You should at least skip to the end to find the link for a fantastic interview with the Illustrators' Partnership about how you are about to lose ownership of your own artwork.

Currently, you don't have to register your artwork to own the copyright. You own a copyright as soon as you create something. International law also supports this. Right now, registration allows you to sue for damages, in addition to fair value.

What makes me so MAD about this new legislation is that it legalizes THEFT! The only people who benefit from this are those who want to make use of our creative works without paying for them and large companies who will run the new private copyright registries.

These registries are companies that you would be forced to pay in order to register every single image, photo, sketch or creative work.

It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense.

This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free.

In short, if Congress passes this law, YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!

Why is this allowed to happen? APATHY and MONEY.

Artists have apathy and corporations have money.

We need to be heard in order to protect our incomes, our creations and our careers. GET OFF YOUR ASS!

That means writing letters to our congressmen and representatives. That means voicing your opinion about how we need copyright protection, as we've had since 1976, that protects everything we create from the moment we create it. This is the case around the world.

However, an Orphan Works bill is also in the works in Europe. I was speaking recently with Roger Dean, the famed artist of the Yes album covers, and he is greatly concerned with what will happen if Orphan Works bills become law.

"This will devastate the livelihood of artists, photographers and designers in a number of ways," Dean says. "That at the behest of a few hugely rich corporations who got rich by selling art that they played no part in the making of, the U.S. and U.K. governments are changing the copyright laws to protect the infringer instead of the creator. This is unjust, culturally destructive and commercial lunacy. This will not just hurt millions of artists around the world.

"On the other side of the coin, what argument will a U.S. court have with a Chinese company that insists it did its research in China and found nothing? If the cost of this is onerous for a U.S.-based artist, what will it be like for artists and small businesses in emergent economies?"

If an artist whose work is as famous as Roger Dean's is concerned with this legislation, it should be of great concern for all of us.

The people, associations and companies behind the Orphan Works bill state that orphaned works have no value. If that were true, no one would want them. However, these same companies DO WANT your work, they just don't want to pay for it. If someone wants something, IT HAS VALUE. It's pretty simple.

Some major art and photography associations, or I should say, the managers of the associations, support this bill. The reason they support it is that they will operate some of the registries and stand to make a lot of money. Some have already been given millions of dollars by the Library of Congress. Follow the money and you will see why some groups support this bill of legalized theft of everything you have ever created.







Comments


As a professional photographer and high school art teacher I am extremely interested in this legislation. However I would like to take a look at the actual legislation before I commit one way or another. In addition, it would probably be helpful, when contacting our State and Federal Legislators, if we had a name or number so as to reference the Legislation in question. Thanks
Michael Koontz (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I just wrote to my school paper about this. This is officially fk'd up.
S. K. (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
http://maradydd.livejournal.com/374886.html This article has been debunked. You might want to remove it. Apparently, it's predicated on a falsehood: there is no such legislation currently introduced or even in committee discussions to be introduced this session. Certainly such legislation could be introduced in the future, but the fact that the entire article is predicated on this (I'm sure unintentional) untruth makes the argument valid but certainly needing a rewrite. The author might want to revisit his thesis and the point where he says such legislation is currently under discussion. It's a good article anyway so hopefully it is rewritten and not abandoned.
(not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Exactly what legislation are you referring to? Is there a citation? I've just spent three hours going over the daybook and I don't see a single piece of proposed legislation related in any way, shape or form to copyright at all - not in committee, on the floor or even tabled. Are you sure you're not referring to the 2006 orphaned-works bill which was never voted on and ultimately dismissed? This is very confusing - your entire article, which is quite interesting, is predicated on the existence of this legislation, and I can't find it anywhere at the national level. Maybe you're talking about something international, before the Berne copyright court? As far as I know, they dismissed similar legislation in 2002 and haven't revisited it, nor have I heard of any plans to. If you can clarify this for us, I'd really appreciate it.
Moe Hong (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Personally, I am disgusted with the American government. There is such a loss of freedom and as a Canadian it hurts me to see that the So called land of the free is willing to take away so much freedom from people. I don't know much about how it would even effect other people in the world. I would not want people to steal my work, even though I don't mind showing it to people or even people using it. all said I don't think it will work, and if it passes there would be riots I think. "Thankfully US copyright laws (and bullshit bills like this one) don't apply in Canada." (this post ©2008 Pixel Shifter) I quote my friend and I bloody hell agree with him. If this shows how corrupt the American government is where they even conceive of this idea it makes me think less of the American government.
philip mcalpine (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
So...lemme see if I got this straight. One day we have to put twenty disclaimers on something just so we won't get sued, and the next we don't own our own art? This is ridiculous! I fully support the rebel groups who are standing up against this abomination, and I stand right there with them!
Jessica Childress (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This is despicable. But I believe there will be uproar if this bill is passed. They can't do this.
Eleanor MJ (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
This is ridiculous and should never pass. Unfortunately, with big businesses behind it, this time, it just might. Apparently, this was attempted in 2005 as well, it just didn't go through. Let's hope it doesn't again. Here is another article about it from 2005. http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/01_topics/article.php?searchterm=...
Amber Stone (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I there any thing us artists outside the States can do to prevent this?
Brad (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
It is worth noting, that while you are absolutely entitled to be pissed about the very notion of the existence of this suitably horrifying bill... it's especially worth noting that the bill died in Congress way back in 2005, and has not been reintroduced since 2006. There's no need to panic, but what's horrifying is that this has become a viral internet article, and many of the artists I watch believed it immediately - and subsequently began to remove all of their work from viewing. I. Am. Horrified.
Matthew Morrison (not verified) | Sat, 04/12/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.