Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All the Rights to Your Own Art

Mark Simon is mad as hell and, in this month's "Mind Your Business," he tells you why you should be too.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld
Mark Simon.
Mark Simon

As you know, I usually handle the subjects in my articles with a sense of humor. That is not the case this month. I find nothing funny about the new Orphan Works legislation that is before Congress.

In fact, it PISSES ME OFF!

As an artist, you have to read this article or you could lose everything you've ever created!

An Orphaned Work is any creative work of art where the artist or copyright owner has released their copyright, whether on purpose, by passage of time, or by lack of proper registration. In the same way that an orphaned child loses the protection of his or her parents, your creative work can become an orphan for others to use without your permission.

If you don't like to read long articles, you will miss incredibly important information that will affect the rest of your career as an artist. You should at least skip to the end to find the link for a fantastic interview with the Illustrators' Partnership about how you are about to lose ownership of your own artwork.

Currently, you don't have to register your artwork to own the copyright. You own a copyright as soon as you create something. International law also supports this. Right now, registration allows you to sue for damages, in addition to fair value.

What makes me so MAD about this new legislation is that it legalizes THEFT! The only people who benefit from this are those who want to make use of our creative works without paying for them and large companies who will run the new private copyright registries.

These registries are companies that you would be forced to pay in order to register every single image, photo, sketch or creative work.

It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense.

This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free.

In short, if Congress passes this law, YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!

Why is this allowed to happen? APATHY and MONEY.

Artists have apathy and corporations have money.

We need to be heard in order to protect our incomes, our creations and our careers. GET OFF YOUR ASS!

That means writing letters to our congressmen and representatives. That means voicing your opinion about how we need copyright protection, as we've had since 1976, that protects everything we create from the moment we create it. This is the case around the world.

However, an Orphan Works bill is also in the works in Europe. I was speaking recently with Roger Dean, the famed artist of the Yes album covers, and he is greatly concerned with what will happen if Orphan Works bills become law.

"This will devastate the livelihood of artists, photographers and designers in a number of ways," Dean says. "That at the behest of a few hugely rich corporations who got rich by selling art that they played no part in the making of, the U.S. and U.K. governments are changing the copyright laws to protect the infringer instead of the creator. This is unjust, culturally destructive and commercial lunacy. This will not just hurt millions of artists around the world.

"On the other side of the coin, what argument will a U.S. court have with a Chinese company that insists it did its research in China and found nothing? If the cost of this is onerous for a U.S.-based artist, what will it be like for artists and small businesses in emergent economies?"

If an artist whose work is as famous as Roger Dean's is concerned with this legislation, it should be of great concern for all of us.

The people, associations and companies behind the Orphan Works bill state that orphaned works have no value. If that were true, no one would want them. However, these same companies DO WANT your work, they just don't want to pay for it. If someone wants something, IT HAS VALUE. It's pretty simple.

Some major art and photography associations, or I should say, the managers of the associations, support this bill. The reason they support it is that they will operate some of the registries and stand to make a lot of money. Some have already been given millions of dollars by the Library of Congress. Follow the money and you will see why some groups support this bill of legalized theft of everything you have ever created.







Comments


TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: A fellow artist who sells many of her works in our organization WCA sent this to me. In turn, I am forwarding this to other fellow artists. Then I will be sending this out to at least three if not more Art Centers in the local area. All artists should be aware of this. In turn, they should take an active part in preventing the pirating of our art work that is so precious to all of us. Genevieve Perkins
Genevieve Perkins (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
What is the number of this bill you are referencing? Please include that or post a link to the bill itself; otherwise no one will be able to judge the bill for themselves. This is the only recent mention I was able to find on Orphan Works, and it doesn't discuss private registries as you have outlined them in your article. http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html
Emily W (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I have one question: What is the bill number of this current attack on artists? Being one I was concerned and started doing my research, and yes there are those of us out there that actually does this, and I could not find any current legislation about this matter in/on the congress website. Any info on this would be far more helpful than plastering this fear mongering style of writing. If we are to make a real stand for ourselves, we need all this kind of information and not just something to get us fired up with no proper direction.
John Karn (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Dear artists and art world, already now, even without the new changes, companies world wide infringe ruthless world known artists. Since five years we fight around the globe for our rights.These peoples interest is only greed and money. ART....creative humans....hard working artists....ethic...all that does not count for these people, they got only $ in their brain, without scruple. These infringers raped from many bronze artists whole collection, up to 30 knock offs. We fight already for our existence. Please visit our web site: www.bronzecopyright.com
Impala Lechner (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I e-mailed the U.S. Copyright Office aksing if Congress was considering changing copyright laws so that one would have to register a work to copyright it at all, and their answer began with "No that is not true." According to the link they gave me(http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html), the bill under consideration seeks to make it easier for artists to use legitimately Orphan Works, not make all unregistered creations Orphan Works... because Orphan Works are not in the public domain. An orphaned work is something that *is* copyrighted, but is difficult if not impossible to contact the copyright owner for permission for another artist to use it. A creation with no copyright that is free and up fo grabs is called "in the public domain." If the law in question said that a work must be registered or it will be considered orphaned, said work would not be in the public domain. Is there a bill under consideration that says all creations must be registered or they will be "in the public domain"? That would make sense- it would be terrible, but it would make sense. I'm a hopeful artist, but I'm not panicking.
Jill (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I just want to say I think your a total jerk. Clearly this article had almost NO research backing it up. The storm this has caused on the online artist community is unparalleled. I hope you got what you wanted if it was a big fat ugly DRAMA FEST you were looking for. You made a much bigger deal out of the whole situation then really needed to be made out of it. No one will loose their their copyrights. If you cant find the photographer of your great grandmothers wedding photo from 100 years ago, THEN you may. And I should also mention this was not an actual bill that was before congress. The idea was shot down twice before it even made it anywhere. Do everyone a favor. Before you take a crack at amateur journalism, you might want to like, make sure you at least know what the hell your talking about. I'm not the only one whose pissed, BTW.
Hummingbird Anonomous (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
The Orphan Works Bill died in Committee in 2006. THERE IS NO SUCH BILL IN CONGRESS AT THIS TIME. Do better research, people.
Wolf SilverOak (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
I am truly upset about this new bill . I will be one of the voices crying in the wilderness of "apathy". I do know that alot of artists are not aware of the proper procedure for copyright registration. The process is not as painful as it sounds and not as difficult as trying to get our work noticed by galleries, museums, and the commercial industry.
christine schmalz (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
First things first; while we get our point across in DC (think two years of shoeleather), let's do what any inventor does: 1. keep daybooks which diarise our key work, and date, sign the entries. Every three months or so, have another person read the daybook and make an entry to the effect that he/she has done that task and understands what's written there. 2. archive all work. Sign and date everything, log those events into your daybook. Photograph or scan everything you do. This will take you about 90 minutes a week, with practice. Record the digital files on separate media, like CD; make two copies, one for your safe box, one at hand. Sounds like a pain but get used to it, it'll go faster. 3. be very carefiul to trace the development of all your biggest ideas, eg the seven or eight drafts of an evolving image. Be conscious of what you believe you are doing AND make sure that someone else knows that you have a record. 4 OK. So now you have records that match those of any inventor; you have done what big firms insist their employee idea people do. Your archive is protected, still, by existing US law practice. If you rally want to gild the lily, mail a copy of your archive to yourself, Certified (important!) and keep the receievd package UNOPENED in case you need to establish a precedence date. 5. What I have just written is what I find I have to teach industrial clients the very first day I am retained. Because I make paintings and designs myself, I offer this very traditional cautionary advice here for free. Good luck all, and let's get together. Peter Cannon
Peter Cannon (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thank you very much for the information here within this article. I have never really paid much attention to the laws of art, and registering things. This disturbs me to no end. I will begin my monotonous conquest of senators shortly
Angel Mori (not verified) | Sun, 04/13/2008 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.