Curious & Curiouser

Joe Strike reports on Curious George — a mischievous monkey’s 15-year trek to the big screen.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld

What Margaret and H.A. Rey predicted has finally come to pass: Curious George is a movie star.

Their 1947 effort Curious George Takes a Job ends with the monkey starring in his own life story, à la Audie Murphy or Muhammad Ali. In the newly released animated feature however, George of the storybooks is portrayed by a cartoon character, and a traditionally animated one at that. In a world of wall-to-wall CGI, George’s current job is not so much to resurrect 2D animation as to return a profit on Universal’s 15-year, eight-figure investment in bringing him to the big screen. The numerous scripts and visual concepts floated for the film over that time chart the evolution of Hollywood thinking when it comes to exploiting a classic children’s book character.

Beyond a few isolated shorts (including a pair of stop-motion adventures produced in 1982), George had never been animated as a feature. At the beginning of 1990s producer Jon Shapiro (Ri¢hie Ri¢h) was able to secure film rights from Margaret Rey, George’s co-creator with her late husband Hans (‘H.A.’). A succession of Hollywood luminaries took a whack at scripting the project, including William Goldman, a pre-Incredibles Brad Bird, Shrek’s Joe Stillman, and Daniel Gerson and Rob Baird from Monsters, Inc. Along the way George was adopted by Ron Howard and Brian Grazer’s Imagine Ent. The little monkey now had some serious muscle backing him up.

It didn’t hurt either when Universal acquired the character from publisher Houghton Mifflin in 1997. The studio’s Consumer Products Group proceeded to transform George from a storybook character into “a brand” and “a global franchise,” driving its sales up 500% in the process. Now all they needed was a movie to really make things happen.

Curious George has gone from all live-action with a computer-animated George [and prior to that, an actual-chimp George] to an all-CGI movie to what it is now, which is all 2D animation. This was all done before I joined the project,” according Matthew O’Callaghan, the director who came in to shepherd the film across the finish line.

O’Callaghan’s writing and directing credits include the TV series, Life with Louie and Mickey Mouse’s CGI debut Twice Upon a Christmas. Now, for his first theatrical feature he was taking charge of a troubled project a year and a half into production, with an equal amount of time left before a merchandising-dictated, do-or-die Feb. 10, 2006 premiere date. (Just in time for George to appear on 100 million Dole banana stickers as well as a U.S. postage stamp.)

“When I reviewed the film before I came aboard, it wasn’t funny, it lacked charm. It wasn’t simple enough for a child to understand.” He declined to name names or point fingers, simply saying, “Everybody was trying to do their best. There’s different circumstances, different people saying, ‘I don’t want to go in that direction.’ There’s always that sort of thing.”

The underlying problem that had to be addressed was one facing every producer bringing a picture book to the screen — how do you expand a story that can be read in 15 minutes to feature length? George’s book adventures follow a simple pattern: the little monkey’s curiosity gets him into trouble, at which point The Man in the Yellow Hat comes to his rescue and eventually all is forgiven.

The solution was to give the man under the hat equal time with George, a character arc and a name. The last part came first: the name “Ted” had popped up in an early draft and stuck. (Ironically, George goes nameless — only referred to as “monkey” — until halfway through the film.) The search for the perfect screenplay began, one that would capture the story of how George and Ted met and became friends. “It’s like a buddy comedy,” O’Callaghan explains, “Two characters who are opposites ultimately come together in the end.”

 







Comments


HERE WE GO-AGAIN; The toon goons have found another "time-proven hit" based upon the lame and whimpy idea that it is safer-wiser,when investing your money,to develope the 'sure thing'. This 'choice' involves everything the excellent article discloses;Spending millions on a simple image-character,which was(for 15 years)a book (IKON ) success, ignoring the 'development' problems of making this an animated feature,by spending big bucks,because the FANS-PAY for this and they....really (do not) matter! Toon-movie going fans; Do you realize how much(in the way of new concepts) YOU are being denied? Will YOU as a fan, "starving for somthing new-origional" ever-in your LIFETIME,be allowed to see all the(still waiting-to be animated) awsome origional,new concepts, that are being 'buried' by this chickenshit premise? Toon goon board meeting;" harrumph-harrumph ,Screw the bored,public toon fans,and let's retro this 'monkey' character,because we already know it has fifteen years of book fans,which is always the cor-pirate choice for the next animated, sure-thing"! And the tragic-trail continues down another decade of an endless line of 'retro',toon concepts . Consider it took FIFTEEN YEARS...for you ,the fans to be presented with this piece of make-over shit,costing YOU big-bucks,and then do the math: How many "fifteen year" waiting periods do YOU have to spare? This is cor-pirate control-robbery,via the(NOW) HELD HOSTAGE cartoon ARTS,and THEY are in complete control,if YOU allow yourself to be manipulated-again and PAY...to see this retro-monkey.... 'monkey business'!! One could-of course,protest,by seeing the video,when it rents for 68 cents,and then decide if you missed anything! When will this trash-toons by cor-pirate-commitees ever END? And will the toon goons ever get any "BALLS",to risk all those millions,on new concepts that NOT tied to some 'the past'?? The 'pink Panther' just got 'trashed' by most reviews,and this says volumes about how many 'heads' are up their asses,in the "RETRO"...movie biz.
DAWK Mc Farlane (not verified) | Sat, 02/11/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.