A Christmas Carol: The Performance Capture Experience
When asked about performing with the markers, Jim Carrey, who plays Scrooge and the three Christmas ghosts, said, "There are certain aspects of the technology that are so exciting and amazing creatively that you can't wait to see what it turns into. Certain aspects of the technology make things easier, to get a lot of scenes done, to do a lot of material at once. There are a lot of aspects that allow [Bob] to create the world that he wants."
"For an actor, there are extra challenges. You have to create the ambiance and the belief in your surroundings in your head," Carrey added. "You can use everything you got. The fingers turn into these long spindly looking things. It's like puppeteering in a way."
Colin Firth, who plays Scrooge's nephew Fred, was only on-set for two days. For his experience, he said when your performing the challenge is that it's "a whole run, a whole scene with no reason to stop. You're never off camera. If you stumble it's in the movie. In some ways you had to rise to the occasion of having all that freedom. There is no proscenium. There's no camera to play to. But having said all that, it's fantastic. It's even more authentic than doing theater because there is no imaginary fourth wall. Or even if you're doing theater in the round, you have to worry about the people in the gallery. Or you have to worry about the marking or blocking. You can do exactly what you want at any time."
Robin Wright Penn, who plays two roles in the film, is a vet of performance capture, having worked on Beowulf. As for the advancement of the technology, she marked, "Even more so with this one, our eyes, every movement and the minutia of the acting that we all did, you see on the screen. And yet, we could change the size of the eyes with the animation. I said at one point, what if I could look like one of those Whoville girls with those big ole blue eyes. And [Robert] said, 'We can do that.' Your every movement is captured and it's fascinating to watch. It really comes through. It's so moving."
As for the stereoscopic 3-D elements, she commented, "It's like watching a 2D performance, but you feel like you can reach out and grab Jim's hand and feel the snow falling at the same time. You're actually in the environment. That's what's so incredible about it."

Bob Hoskins, who plays Scrooge's former employer Fezziwig, worked with Zemeckis on the revolutionary Who Framed Roger Rabbit? Commenting on the difference between that film and this one, he said, "Before everything had to be dressed and we shot the film and then they blew up the frames and painted on the characters. With this they shot all the performances and then they paint the background, put on the costumes, and do everything. So it was the complete reverse. And what was extraordinary was the fact that once you're covered in all this stuff you got nothing else to do but to concentrate on your performance. They've taken all responsibility from you. It's extraordinary."
Carrey added, "There were times when as film actors, you're use to having the proscenium in your head somewhere and there are boundaries, but in this there are no boundaries anymore. It's odd not to have any boundaries. Once in awhile, I'd say to Bob, 'Can you just stick a camera there? Just so I can feel someone, because I'm use to having someone.'"
On that Zemeckis said, "I learned this early on. I put a marker on the camera and then it becomes a character, and immediately I'm creating shots in the virtual world, but what it also does for the performances [is that] the camera [becomes] a dance partner. The camera is another performer, so the camera creates rhythm, so the actor feels the camera moving from here to here so he knows when to deliver the line. So that is a very helpful tool because we've all been trained in having that camera as a partner."























Always loving checking out behind the scenes footage/seeing actors in their element. Pretty cool.
a great movie and a great story, i have always loved the spirit behind such stories and the christmas carol brings it out, i just love everything about this book since i read it a long time back
my all time favorite book and now movie, it depcits the soul of the story and i could watch it again and again adn never get bored, the best thing!!
Oh this was definitely a good movie. Great animation and nice story. Worth the watch.
This movie has been out for ages and there is always someone doing their own version of this timeless classic. Each one has done it justice as well. They don't tear it up too much.
Regards,
Home remedies for cold sores
While I don't have a problem with re-hashing old, tried and tested stories new productions need to bring something new to the party. This production, in my eyes, was stilted and jarring. I wasn't engaged by the presentation and for me engagement is a crucial factor in animated movies.
As noted by a previous commenter - motion capture movies have performed badly at the box office so maybe we need to go back to basics.
have created the Tolkien Saga with these technologies. And I do not mean the few special effects but everything. Now I just cannot get the personal characters out of my head when I read the books. So I only read the Lost Tales nowadays.
This one is a true delight getting back to the roots of the original story and trying very successfully to prevent diversion from the original story (description, chronology, ect.) the images are top notch and the cinematography is state of the art. Too bad that the 3D effect is a little off in some scenes.
This one is a must see even though some scenes may be too intense for younger audiences but skip paying extra for the 3D effect. They truly did not drive it home with the 3D effect.
The movie sucked... it took the spirit of the classic Christmas story and threw it in the trash! It was terrible. Why even make this movie? Like it hasn't been a thousand times already... geez. Freaking Hollywood is pissing me off. Can't they come up with anything new any more?!!!
I don't know about all this motion capture or keyframe stuff you guys are talking about. What I do know is that, the character moved horribly. it was very robotic and distracting.
The movie sucked
I saw the movie the other day, and I thought it was outstanding. A Christmas Carol really makes Polar Express show it's age. If you're still using that MoCap mess as a point for comparison it's time to get up to date. The mocap actually looks decent now and Jim Carey's performance is really able to shine through. It did not seem to have any major awkward moments that have plagued some of Zemeckis' early films.
As great as Jim Carey is, what really sells the movie is the creative cinemetograpy that shows all the untapped potential of using 3D as a medium. It's absolutely wild, especialy with the 3D glasses, and the experimentation probably would not have been possible without the aid of motion capture to speed up production. If you hate Zemeckis purely on the principle of Mocap, you're not giving him a full, fair assesment. There is so much more to a Christmas Carol in particular as a film than just the acting. It is really a shame all the coverage of his works foucs on the MoCap performances.
This may be a touchy subject for some people here, but the end goal is to make a film that would otherwise be impossible through live action. Keyframe Animation is just a one way to achieve those results in today's world. Zemeckis has just taken an approach against the norm that has ruffled a few feathers.
Post new comment