“When Cartoons Were Cartoony:” John Kricfalusi Presents

Dr. Toon interviews John Kricfalusi about his favorite cartoons, which have inspired the Ren & Stimpy creator's forthcoming screening series at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood, California.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld | Columns: Dr. Toon

DT: Interesting thing about Swing You Sinners; nearly everybody working on it was animating for the first time because Fleischer had to replace a bunch of animators that quit. That is amazing!

JK: Well, Grim Natwick worked on it, and his animation of the ghouls and monsters is amazing. Ghosts, dinosaurs — everything! After Swing You Sinners, we'll run Mysterious Mose (1930). That has a lot of Grim Natwick in it, and what I think are the cutest animation drawings of Betty Boop ever done. Absolutely beautiful.

DT: Doesn't she still have dog ears in that film?

JK: Yeah, but she's really great looking! If you look at the first Betty Boop cartoon, Dizzy Dishes (1930) she's hideous in that one, but that's Grim Natwick, too. Whenever she talks her mouth comes out like a foreskin. I still love that cartoon but Mose is such a contrast because Betty looks so cute. She doesn't look like a big fly or something. I'm going to show a Popeye cartoon but I'm not 100% sure which one.

Sometimes it's hard to get the studios to give you a print of something. I put down A Clean Shaven Man (1936) but pretty much any Popeye from 1933-1938 is going to be great. One thing that's special about the Popeye cartoons is that they gave everyone unique walks and runs. There's a real funny walk for Popeye, almost like little dances that he does. Olive's are crazy, those big spaghetti legs flying around. Fleischer did that better than anyone ever did, and they excelled at animating technical stuff, too.

I had more trouble getting the prints I want to show for Chuck Jones. I wanted to show The Dover Boys and Tom Thumb In Trouble. The thing about Chuck Jones is, everybody knows his cartoons. If you were showing the best of Jones you would probably show stuff like One Froggy Evening but I like his 1940s cartoons better than the ones that made Jerry Beck's The 50 Greatest Cartoons. One of the things I want to achieve with the second show is to display "The Age of Cartooniness." Not the "golden age," because not everybody making films was cartoony. Disney wasn't — he was the anti-cartoonist. He didn't like cartooniness.

Chuck Jones didn't either. I don't know how many people besides historians and diehard fans know that, but when the general public thinks of the "golden age of animation" they think of Chuck Jones. What I wanted to show is what Jones would have been if it had not been for Bob Clampett. Jones had two general tendencies; One was the tendency to do super-cute, Disneyesque syrupy-sweet cartoons, and the cutest, syrupy-sweetest cartoon ever made is Tom Thumb In Trouble. It's so sweet that it's rude! One of my very favorite Jones cartoons. My other favorite is The Dover Boys, the first stylized cartoon. It inspired John Hubley and all the UPA guys and caused a revolution in animation. And Jones almost got fired for it!

DT: Leon Schlesinger hated that cartoon.

JK: I love the cartoon, I think it's amazing. It's stylized but it's funny, it has Warner Bros. jokes in it. It's not like Tom Thumb, which is unlike a Warners cartoon. Those two cartoons say "Chuck Jones" to me more than any other he's done. When he started making his real funny cartoons, that's because Schlesinger was telling him, "You'd better start making Clampett-style cartoons or you're out of here!" Jones wanted to be known as a "high artist" and maybe to him there were two ways to approach that. One was through cute — for some reason cuteness is associated with high art — or stylized stuff that looked like illustrations or magazine cartoons. That's what "The Dover Boys" looked like. Leon Schlesinger wanted no part of that. He just wanted pure entertainment.

Then we come to Bob Clampett, whom nobody had to tell to be entertaining. That was just in his blood, he was walking entertainment. He made cartoons in which not only was the animation good, every single part of his cartoons was good. The music was great, the timing phenomenal, the sound effects — every element of the film he was using, Clampett loved. Compare him to other directors like Tex Avery. Avery pretty much loved just one thing: getting a gag across. He experimented with design to a certain extent but his soundtracks weren't very good and he was strapped with Scott Bradley, whose idea of funny music was to play everything off-key. Avery didn't care about acting. Clampett cared about everything.







Comments


oYHKmEw (not verified) | Sun, 08/28/2011 - 22:06 | Permalink
John Kricfalusi wrote a tremendous tribute to me in one of your issues. I live in Greece now where someone had sent it to me. John, thanks! I'm still involved with color, doing architectural designing for Hilton hotels and for cruiseship. Curiously enough, a client said "Nobody uses color the way Lozzi does." Would like to hear from you. art lozzi
ART (Arminio) LOZZI (not verified) | Mon, 10/17/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink
sir, which was your starting point to start making cartons. i mean when you started making cartoon animation series and what was your first job ofered to you. and how you reached on this position please tell me about you from start.
saurabh kashyap (not verified) | Thu, 05/26/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink
While Kricfalusi has a well rehearsed sense of animation history, his choices for best cartoons and his own "creative" content illustrate his obsessions with issues of race, gender, and sexual orientation. Coal Black, and other films of that ilk, clearly speak of societal values held in a past gone era, values which American society should not be proud of; values which devalue non-whites and non-males. While he speaks of valuing change, his films do not reflect that value. Kricfalusi, in my opinion, is emotionally reacting, via his medium, to postmodernism, to racial tolerance and integration, to gender equality, and to choice in sexual orientation. His "agenda" however, backfires. A screening of "Boo Boo Runs Wild" at the UCLA School of Theater, Film and Digital Media in 1999 for graduate students elicited comments such a "There is so much gay tension in that film", and "He MUST be a closet homosexual". While I ardently defend his right to say it, I do not agree with his evaluation of how the world is, or how it should be. I cringe at the thought of him making "educational films" in a medium that is traditionally perceived of as targeting children as an audience, and I abhor his attitude (arrogance?) about knowing what is "true, good and right", when in actuality, he might not know any of those things. Don't misunderstand me, Kricfausi is an amazing draftsman and his sense of timing is second to none. I learned a great deal about animation timing when I worked for him, but my year at his studio was one of the most conflict laden and tense years in my life. I learned nothing about how to become a "better person" as a result of our interactions. But then, that just says something about my own values, and I should have know that before I took the job.
Fred Cabella (not verified) | Wed, 11/03/2004 - 01:00 | Permalink
I would love to see this in Australia. Any chance? I saw John Kricfalusi when he came to Sydney to present a showing of "Man's Best Friend" and some other 'Ren and Stimpy' cartoons at the Museum of Contemporary Art. The place was packed!
Steven Cateris (not verified) | Sat, 10/23/2004 - 00:00 | Permalink
I love the work and the show rocks
drew kingsley (not verified) | Wed, 09/29/2004 - 00:00 | Permalink
I have a question. What are you asking exactly, or more to the point--suggesting? "Why do show new Ren & Stimpy cartoons?" That doesn't make any sense in more than one way. Try asking that question again with a little more thought. But if what you're implying is what I am understanding, Ren Stimpy were epic--and always will be. You may have your own opinion, it's a free country (for the most part). But if the Simpsons had only do one show, it tragedy would be. Now, see if can you guess what I'm implying or more to the point--asking.
Ryan Richmond (not verified) | Mon, 09/27/2004 - 00:00 | Permalink
John K. & Spumco Artists in person at Petition signing party Sat Sept. 11 John Kricfalusi (K.), and his cohorts from Spumco will be appearing in person Sat. Sept. 11 at 3PM at Golden Apple (7711 Melrose Ave.) to host a “Petition Signing Party”. John is trying to convince the powers that be at Spike TV to authorize new episodes of the “Ren and Stimpy Adult Party Cartoon”. The “Party” will include autographs, free mini-posters commemorating the event and declaring the petition signors “undying love and devotion” to Ren & Stimpy, screening of unaired and preview episodes, lively and rabble rousin’ Q&A, self aggrandizing speeches and surprise guests. For more information, go to: http://www.goldenapplecomics.com/upcoming.html Contact: Bill Liebowitz, Golden Apple (323) 658-6047
Bill Liebowitz (not verified) | Mon, 09/06/2004 - 00:00 | Permalink
I have a question. Why do show new Ren & Stimpy cartoons?
Kylie Paton (not verified) | Fri, 09/03/2004 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.