Screen Test

There are a lot of television toons coming to the big screen these days. Martin "Dr. Toon" Goodman takes a look at this growing phenomenon and all its good and bad points.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld | Columns: Dr. Toon

As we remember, the first movie starring that yellow ingenue Pikachu was followed by several sequels that went to theaters rather than OAV. A well-received film that makes a tidy profit may become a franchise. In an interview with Toon Zone (2/24/02), Craig McCracken revealed that he was considering ideas for a Powerpuff sequel. There seems no doubt that the Powerpuff Girls will not play (and pay) well enough to bring Professor Utonium's waifs back for an encore, but if the idea of a TV series birthing a movie franchise seems farfetched, Rugrats has two films in the can already. These movies are also a safe bet for studios by dint of being pre-sold and pre-marketed. How many people will go to a multiplex next year where Spongebob Squarepants is playing and wonder, "Gee, I wonder what this funny-looking thing might be?" One might as well fail to recognize Tom Cruise.

Some Concerns
If there is a downside, it rests upon the downtrodden independents, who have a hard enough time getting their films made. Only so many movies will be released per year, and only so many of them will be animated. I pity those like Bill Plympton, who gamely soldier on though their films seem to be seen only by their appreciative fans. I pity those like Richard Rich, who may never gain a shot at redemption because studio executives decide to go with a tried-and-true TV hit over their feature production. I pity the legions of Internet animators who may have seen their dreams distanced by yet one more obstacle when it's hard enough to sell a concept already. Another concern (at least of mine) is the situation that could be created at the Academy Awards now that animated films have their own category. Is it possible that someday the Powerpuff Girls may do battle with The Wild Thornberrys (due for a feature team-up with the Rugrats) for an Academy Award? Technically, both films would be eligible if entered, but if a television-based feature took the prize over an original film what would that mean for Oscar?

These are not questions for the future; the future is here. Within the darkened province of our movie houses the Powerpuff Girls battle Mojo Jojo, Arnold battles a greedy developer, and Spongebob Squarepants will battle, one suspects, his uncontrollable exuberance. They are only the vanguard. Of course, there is always the possibility that the entire venture may go the way of the recent prime-time animation bust, but shed no tears for the studios should that happen; many animated films have a great track record of outdoing their box office profit after they are released to video. In short, translating TV-based features to the big screen is likely to guarantee a profit one way or another. Keep an eye on some of your favorite toons over this year; they might just be up on the big screen next year.

Martin "Dr. Toon" Goodman is a longtime student and fan of animation. He lives in Anderson, Indiana.








Comments


Interesting topic, but as one reader commented a lot is missing, making the puzzle harder to solve. The business of animation is a complex labyrnth. First, there were several features to hit in the 1980s based on TV series like MY LITTLE PONY, HE-MAN, HEATHCLIFFE, etc. However, most did abysmal business. The conventional wisdom, that it had to "look like Disney" to sell, was the average excuse. Even your listing of recent shows seemed to neglect such success tales as BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD and SOUTH PARK. WB even released an animated BATMAN theatrically, which did less well. In fact, the reason a change has occured at all IS the success of such shows as BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD, etc. As one animation exec stated these shows proved "you don't need good animation to have a hit". With the first POKEMON feature doing so well, and RUGRATS, studios feel less inhibited by what they perceive as "lower quality art". Also, when one can produce an animated feature based on a popular character for under $20 million, you are almost certain to break even with home video. If, by chance it does big bucks at the box-office, it's just more gravy. And don't forget the gravy!
John Cawley (not verified) | Tue, 08/13/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
Your article is well-thought out and precise, but correct me if I'm wrong- I believe I remember transformers the series came out in 85'. Shortly there after, due to fanbased popular ratings Transformers The Movie came out in 86 (the first time America would see a small series convert to the big screen) . Again correct me if im wrong, it just that it crossed my mind as i read your article.
Bert Clause (not verified) | Thu, 07/25/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink
martin-dr.toon,thanks for a well-thought-out article-assesment of animation trends. after reading your article (opened my eyes) i was thinking of a SIMILAR parrallel or anology of the current stock market "trends".could this current process of 'recycling' animation, from T V ..to the big screen be the final result....of the entire STRANGULATION...of any new concept-small studio-success? one can only hope for this blantant abuse of "cartoon-creationisim"to eventually be ...IGNORED by audiences, like the (investors) are ignoring the market...because they are not getting any "returns" via -viewing satisfaction.sort of like all the "empty calories' in junk food, and one goes away feeling 'hungry" for more? is this kind of "starving for real-new animation" concepts operating like the junk-food markets? can the future be..MOUNTAINS of plastic-toon pressed characters...piled-up all over the globe? the GREEN-HOUSE effect via.. "commercialisim"-licensing-for-every -T V -to- -animation-to the selling of licensing-trash?will it CRASH...just like the stock market ,because parents will eventually refuse to "sucker-in" to this landslide of "licensing" gimmicks! i see a gigantic-evil-dark dark shadow forming over the very future of animation,with no room for the "visionaries"...just mountains of commercial-trash piling-up ...every year and lots of... "funeral" announcments...of "REAL TALENT"...dying, ..along with (their) dwindling audiences,who no longer have any hope;......like the song.."where have all the flowers gone"...."von vilst mon yagerstayn"....von vilst mon yagerstayn... dawk
dale dawk mc farlane (not verified) | Tue, 07/23/2002 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.