June Bugged: Cartoon Network's Controversy

Who was right and who was wrong in the "June Bugs" Cartoon Network fiasco? Martin "Dr. Toon" Goodman reveals that that is not the question...it is, of course, a much deeper issue.
Posted In | Columns: Dr. Toon

Bugs Trivia
Click above for the answer!
Still, it is regrettable to see censorship sustained under these terms. If the Cartoon Network was truly meant to be the Royal Archive of All Toons Warner, then by all means AOL Time Warner should have worked with their corporate stepchild in order to preserve the Cartoon Network's integrity. If Cartoon Network had given Warner more advance notice, and Warner possessed the bravery and sincerity of their subsidy, perhaps a position could have been reached that satisfied the Network, the fans and the money men. The Twelve could have been packaged as a separate, historical addendum to the Bugsfest (reportedly, Cartoon Network is working with Jerry Beck on just such a project). In such a context, wider issues could have been discussed and the reasons behind the disclaimers explained in full. Instead, Warner stood accused of killing the shorts to save Bugs' lucrative image, the Cartoon Network did not present a truly historic event, and (as is typical where censorship is involved) the fans were cheated.

The Greatest Crime?
The saddest part of all? These censored shorts were indeed "representative of the time in which they were created." That also means they are laughably outdated and more ridiculous than offensive. Racism is indeed a detestable moral crime; the mother of genocide and an execration upon all civilized nations. Yet, the face of racism has changed over time and the manner of its presentation has changed as well. Although racial stereotypes will never be outdated -- they are far too handy to use as icons of contempt -- their representations can be. The Twelve, particularly those unkind to blacks, belong in that class; their racism can be best found today among the residents of nursing homes. There has not been a formally presented minstrel show in this country for at least sixty years. Mammiferous mammies, shuck-and-jive dice tossers and shufflin' watermelon chompers are offensive but antiquated foolishness. Today's racism takes more serious forms: racial profiling; the dismantling of Affirmative Action; schools that are segregated de facto if not legally; the new stereotypes of the Gangbanger and the Welfare Queen; the discriminatory "crime" of Driving While Black; standardized tests that produce nothing but damage and "bell curve" mentalities; and a disproportionate population of young black males incarcerated in our prison system to name just a few. Is the most grievous offense society can commit that of showing Bugs Bunny imitating a white man imitating a black man?

No cartoons could be more outdated than those featuring anti-Japanese propaganda. In times of war it is typical to slander and dehumanize an enemy, and Japan was one of the deadliest foes America ever faced in combat. By the time WWII ended, 150,000 American servicemen -- half of those who died in the conflict -- perished in the Pacific Theater. It is impossible for those who did not live through this war to appreciate the fear and hatred of an enemy who actually did threaten our shores. So great was this terror that thousands of innocent Japanese-Americans were shamefully interred in detention camps lest they form a "fifth column;" this was a racist crime greater than any seven-minute propaganda cartoon could ever perpetrate. Today we are economic allies with Japan and most high school students can barely identify that nation as our adversary in the Second World War. Anyone who, at this late date, takes these cartoons seriously still drives a Studebaker and supports the New Deal.










Comments


In comparisson to cartoons that are aired today, Bugs Bunny is minor. I agree that now I am an adult I do recognize why there is a discussion taking place but as a child watching Bugs Bunny I did not pick up on those ideals and only saw the entertainment value. Bugs was at lease subtle where as todays newer cartoons are very much in your face with snott bubbles and farting and some of the craziest story lines I have ever seen. Everyone wants to critisize Bugs but I dont remember any negative impacts to my school mates nor myself from watching it. Why aren't people protesting these as well? Why is it ok for the children today to watch these mis porportioned female cartoon characters and nasty bodily functions and dis regard for athority that is so dominant today?
Rhonda H. (not verified) | Tue, 04/18/2006 - 00:00 | Permalink
In response to pulled "Bugs" It is clear to me that the exclusion of the "Bugs" episodes was an appropriate decision. It wasn't all that long ago that folks claimed television, or movies, did not stir viewers to unacceptable views and behaviors, eventhough, Malcolm McClaren had writen and spoken about it throughout the sixties. It is now generally accepted to be so. It is an apparently complex subject, but the argument that suggests we should view these animated works now, in the context of "their times" could quite easily be used to endorse the continued use of the Confederate flag (an interesting design), or even multiple wives for men (a biologically driven behavior). "See you later Mister Arab" is a bit much don't you think?
Peter MacWhirter (not verified) | Mon, 11/05/2001 - 01:00 | Permalink
I agree that The Twelve should have been shown. Yes, discrimination and racism exist. One of the ways that we can help to eliminate them is to learn from our mistakes. Our children are not going to learn to respect all people reguardless of skin color or ethinic status unless we help to make them aware. They need to know what happened in the past so that they are able to determine that it was wrong and take the steps to prevent it from happening. Blocking what happened in the past will not benefit anyone. You cannot erase discrimination and racism like they never existed, but you can help to prevent it in the future, through awarness and knowledge.
Sam Tallman (not verified) | Thu, 07/26/2001 - 00:00 | Permalink
Dr. Toon wonders whether the showing of one cartoon exceeds the stereotypical racism of a sproting event. My question is: why does it have to? Judge it on its own merit. While I think there is value in highlighting these 12 as documentary of offense (as well as staining the intelectual properties of the venerable AOL/WB/WeOwnYouCorp) I must say I applaud their decision to hold them back from broadcast. Levi Strauss used to advertise that their blue jeans were made with "100% White Labor" as a sign of quality (and perhaps sterility?). Sure, it should be documented, by do we thumb our noses at Levi's for not including that tag line in their ads today? And just like Levi's jeans, Bugs is not art: Bugs is business.
leMel 42 (not verified) | Thu, 07/19/2001 - 00:00 | Permalink
This kind of political correctness is bound to happen more often, as larger and larger conglomerates start producing our entertainment, news and other media. If Warner Brothers Animation were still a fairly small entity, a few people in charge could decide to take a chance with the Bugs cartoons running unedited. But this is now AOL Time Warner, who can't afford to upset anyone in even a slight matter. Also, decisions like this have to go through many layers of hierarchy, any part of which can protest the decision. We can always hope for the best, that something wonderful will come about despite the committees, the lawyers and the executives without courage. And sometimes the best occurs. But it's still the minor players, the small companies, and the individuals with powerful computers and lots of time to produce shows that are the real hope of creative entertainment. It's worth hunting such creators in the small film festivals and science fiction/fantasy conventions. Unlike the folks at official film festivals, people showing at small shows aren't hoping to snag that marvelous high-paying job with King Kong Konglomerate Films - they just want to make movies.
Thomas E. Reed (not verified) | Tue, 07/17/2001 - 00:00 | Permalink
The disclaimer of the Cartoon Network says it all:"Cartoon Network does not endorse the use of racial slurs. These vintage cartoons are presented as representative of the time in which they were created and are presented for their historical value." Considering the ban, all live action films showing bad red commis, and any other racist/political/sexual stereotypes should be banned from TV... same with violence.
Norm Rompre (not verified) | Fri, 07/13/2001 - 00:00 | Permalink
I think we need to be left to make up our own minds, but presenting the so-called Dirty Dozen in some sort of historical context might be necessary. They did this on the "ToonHeads" show by presenting clips of cartoons from World War II; the narrator mentioned the use of stereotype may not seem funny by today's standards, but that's how it was Way Back Then. Show the Dirty Dozen with similar narration at the beginning. To deny the viewing public these important cartoons is denying history and insulting their intelligence by not letting them decide for themselves what is/isn't funny. (And I'll go on record that "Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarves"is my favorite Bob Clampett Warner Bros. toon!)
Andy Dunn (not verified) | Thu, 07/12/2001 - 00:00 | Permalink
Dr. Toon wrote: "Let the Twelve be shown again, but with the sensitivity, consideration, and intelligence needed to portray a regrettable part of our past history. I believe we can handle it." It's this mentality of calling this humor regrettable that further makes it impossible to see these shorts. Ethnic humor is a staple of comedy, as time-honored as the pie-in-the-face, and it will remain in the comedian's arsenal for as long as comedy exists. Some of the humor may be crass by our modern day standards, but is it any more crass than the caricatures of Indian people (from India) on THE SIMPSONS. Fifty years from now, we may find it very unacceptable to make light of Indian immigrants working for low wages at 24-hour mini-marts, but I hardly think it would be fair to then call THE SIMPSONS a regrettable part of our past history. Sensitivity to all cultures is an impossibility in whatever age you're living in. There's always going to be some groups of people that'll be caricatured excessively. People need to lighten up and accept it for what it was meant to be - the comedy of a certain period. But it's hypocritical to criticize the past so vehemently when we create equally harsh ethnic humor in modern times (only we've replaced the blacks and Jap with more "acceptable" cultures for parody).
Amid Amidi (not verified) | Wed, 07/11/2001 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.