Dr. Toon: War and Pieces

Dr. Toon draws parallels between Road Runner and Wile E. Coyote cartoons and the Cold War, the Vietnam War and the current Iraqi War.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld | Columns: Dr. Toon

… a determined low-technology adversary can take a great deal of the kind of punishment meant to break more developed societies.

— Derek Leebeart, The Fifty-Year Wound

How about ending this cartoon before I hit?

— The Coyote, Gee Whiz-z-z (1956)

At some point during 1956, the same year in which the above cartoon featuring the Road Runner and Wile E. Coyote made its debut, a North Vietnamese commander named Ho Chi Minh led his Cong-san forces against South Vietnam for the first time. Roughly translated, Cong-san meant Communist; from this term came the phrase “Viet Cong”. Virtually no one in America was then familiar with this appellation, but over the next decade that would change drastically. Among those who knew the term well were President Dwight Eisenhower and his successor John F. Kennedy.

Although Eisenhower backed French forces against the Cong-san with several billion dollars, Kennedy decided to make a deeper commitment against Communist forces in Southeast Asia. The young president strongly felt the need to make such a move. The year 1962 featured a failed invasion of Cuba by U.S.-trained insurgents. The previous year, East Germany erected one of the most visible symbols of the Cold War, the infamous Berlin Wall. As Kennedy himself put it, “Now we have a problem making our power credible, and Vietnam is the place.”

By the time director Chuck Jones made his 23rd Road Runner and Coyote film, there were nearly 17,000 Americans in South Vietnam serving as “advisors.” When Jones left the series in 1964, America’s involvement in Vietnam was roughly a year away from commencing its overt military phase. Millions more would be mobilized in the coming years, and when all was said and done, some 58,000 of them would die in combat. During the carnage, Rudy Larriva directed most of the Road Runner’s remaining adventures, but Jones’ imprimatur was already well established.

Chuck Jones, with his Road Runner cartoons, unwittingly predicted the terms under which the Cold War was waged during the late 1950s through the 1980s. No other animation director formulated a more precise or timely picture of America’s agonies in Vietnam. The Road Runner and Coyote also serve as an eerie analogy to the current war in Iraq, but even more eerie is the fact that Chuck Jones never intended for his Roadrunner cartoons to serve this purpose.

The Cold War was an inescapable fact of American life that influenced every nuance of the country’s collective consciousness, and perhaps, on some level, that of Jones as well. In his book Hollywood Cartoons (1999), animation historian Michael Barrier noted: “The Road Runner cartoons were perhaps the most consistently violent of all the Warner Bros. cartoons… “ Perhaps that was because they were the most fitting metaphor for warfare. In fact, the title I chose for this month’s column is that of Jones’ final Road Runner cartoon as a Warner employee.

From the full-blown fear of nuclear Armageddon to the subtle paranoid ideations of a free world steadily nibbled away by stealth and espionage, Americans lived their lives against a steady, unsettling background of Them vs. Us. The Road Runner series was born and continued amidst several seismic shocks administered to the free world. The first Road Runner/Coyote film, Fast and Furry-ous, arrived in 1949, the year that China went Communist and the Soviet Union exploded their first nuclear weapon. The series’ second short (Beep Beep) premiered in 1952 during the height of the Red Scare.

Chuck Jones was an extremely intelligent individual who certainly took notice of the world around him. According to Jones, he was attempting to create a parody of stereotypical chase cartoons; what he coincidentally did was create a metaphor for the questionable strategies of war in the era of the Unthinkable… with superpowers in the role of the Coyote. More specifically, Jones foresaw the results of warfare fought when superpowers faced far weaker but determined guerilla enemies who believed that their survival was at stake. Take note that America was not unique in taking on the role of the Coyote: the Soviet Union, in all its monolithic strength, met defeat at the hands of Afghanistan’s rag-tag, resourceful mujahdeen in the 1980s.







Comments


I found the article interesting. I think many talented artists and creative people will extrapolate from the climate they reside in. It's the nature of creativity.
Christina Lane (not verified) | Thu, 10/20/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink
Thanks to "Animation World Newsletter" for allowing my nervous, first attempt at this! Two points: First--while detractors of Dr. Toon are certainly entitled to their opinions--PLEASE detract with a sense of good-natured humor! Happily, that first detractor...Andy Sim?...what IS his name?...was much more light-hearted than I suspected at f-i-r-s-t. (Whew!) I have read comments (not yet in "AWN," I'm relieved to say), which insinuate or infer that the writer, filmmaker, song-lyricist, &c., "ain' got NO rah-t t' say whut he/she done said!" Over the 1990s, I read the following two examples: "I don't think you have any right to criticize New Kids on the block, 'cause then, you make a lot of people mad." (Teenager's response to 21-yr.-old columnist's article... inside teen-column, "Fresh Voices"...itself within s-o-m-e 1990s' issue of "Parade," Sun. newspaper-insert magazine. Gee...where were the "likes," "okays," and "f'r sh'rre, dudes"?) Another beaut: "Don't say anything bad about the church. She is a sacred & perfect institution." (Clergyman, at statewide, denominational convention, in 1973...reacting to Rev. Harold Lauder [sic]. Said pastor evidently heard of Lauder's plans to publish "Feed Whose Sheep?" [Revell Press, 1974], his thought-provoking critique---both of his past church's laity's words & conduct, a-n-d of his denomination's bishops...a-n-d of what HE himself had become, after years under the pressure.) ALL of these I call "layperson's responses." These are neither critiques nor advice, from animation's r-e-a-l pros. You've heard "layperson's advice" from others before...within your extended family, and/or within your neighborhood, suburb, or small-town (written here, in our Appalachian dialect back-home): "Ah admit, you draws 'n' paints guh-h-d. But juss' whar d'yew thank you'se gawnna make a livvin' ac-sh'lly d-o-i-n' that fer a job?" To sum-up: If (like thousands of people in creative arts-media, crafts, journalism, & advertising) you grew up ACHING to get-out-from-under a belly-full of "layperson's advice"--then p-l-e-e-e-z-z-e, by the same token, grant that same courtesy to writers! Where he or she is wrong: (1.)Point that out...be specific, now. (2.) Then, give e-v-i-d-e-n-c-e to the contrary. Do a l-i-t-t-l-e homework...! (2.) Dr. Toon certainly did HIS! Yes, he might h-a-v-e read a l-i-t-t-l-e too much into Chuck Jones' storyboards. However, he cited evidence from at least three wars. (Four, if you count Operation Desert Storm, in 1990-'91. Its aftermath [where we promised to "help" the Kurdish troops...but then, provided NEITHER weapons NOR technical-training]...a-n-d our LACK of N.A.T.O. and Allied peacekeepers in Afghanistan--t-h-e-s-e were the REAL stinkers of bad-judgement, on the afults of both the elder Pres. Bush and ol' "Slick Willie," in my opinion! Neither must we forget the support that ol' "Teflon Ron's" cabinet gave to Sadaam, during the Iran/Iraq War of 1980s.) And Dr. Toon continued his research into (possibly) Chuck Jones' past writings, to say nothing of his past film-work, watercolors, & canvasses. (Mr. Jones' participation in the screen-cartoonists' strike of 1940-'41, and excerpts about same event in his 1989 "Chuck Amuck!", easily come to mind. And I had forgotten!...that Mr. Jones had directed "H**l-bent for Election," since that was UPA's maiden-voyage.) Seems to me...that such writings or PBS-type documentaries (where media-historians read inferences [into "junk-culture"] that the creators may-or-may-not have had in-mind) can only get us readers to t-h-i-n-k. Can only stimulate o-u-r creativity. Can only awaken any social consciousness (and consciences) that you & I might have. Could John Halas & Joy Batchelor have read these...in addition to Orwell's "Animal Farm"...b-e-f-o-r-e committing it to animation (1954, UA)?...could the writers of the Beatles' and Peter Max's "Yellow Submarine" (UA, 1968)?...could the late Dr. Seuss...Chuck Jones' personal friend...before he wrote "The Butter Battle Book"? (Too bad that Ralph Bakshi seemed to have a m-u-c-h dirtier mind, in my opinion, in his o-w-n scripts....) How many of you out there remember "The Point"---the ONLY animated-special on the "ABC Movie of the Week," back in 1972? (Murakami/Wolf/Swenson Prods.?) Too bad that I don't know whether or not it's available on DVD & video, for my nieces & nephews...for it taught US, both about Dr. Hegel's thesis/antithesis/synthesis theory...a-n-d about human prejudice vs. open-minded acceptance for "disabled, handicapped" people--but in the sugared form of a charming script, for us elem.-schoolers of the "Brady/Partridge Era." (A little boy, born with a "conehead"...is shamed & ostracized by his village's "respectables." Elsewhere, he searches for the acceptance which his village's mayor, teachers, & even c-l-e-r-g-y, had never given him. On his travels, he receives such acceptance from his dog, Arrow--and then, from other tribes of people. Years later, he returns to his own village--only to find that t-h-e-i-r children had grown "coneheads," too!) Could a-l-l such scriptwriters have read opinion-columns such as Dr. Toon's? IF they had...think how many "hidden meanings," how many adult-sub-plots, we "AWN" readers can ingest into OUR future scripts, comic-books, & childrens' books! Critique Dr. Toon's article as being "too deep," if you must. But--you need only look back at h-a-l-f of 2004-2005's animated releases (i.e., "The Spongebob Squarepants Movie," "Robots," "Madagascar," and "Valiant"---h**l, back to Warners' "Incredible Mr. Limpet," in 1963--to see WHY fresh, inventive plots (WITH such hidden messages, adult sub-plots, and/or emotional d-e-p-t-h, or SOMETHING that "The Incredibles, "Polar Express," "Wallace & Grommit," and "Corpse Bride" happily possess)--you need only see those o-t-h-e-r features, bound s-t-r-a-i-g-h-t for "Cartoon Network Theatre," to see w-h-y plots as d-e-e-p as Dr. Toon's column are b-a-d-l-y needed these days...! (4.) Enough of my rambling, on-and-on! If the (praiseworthy) Dr. Toon wants to discuss anything p-o-l-i-t-i-c-a-l, I'd recommend TWO topics that burn ME up, believe you me! (A.) Racist-stereotypes of past cartoon-shorts, w-e-l-l into early-1950s; late-1960s, for s-o-m-e TV "kidvid" prior to 1968. (The year of three beginnings: Action for Children's Television, Corp. for Public Broadcasting, & "Sesame Street.") (B.) Animation studios that produce strictly over-16, R-rated material...even live-action (i.e., Nelvana's Cinema Masterpiece, "Burglar" [WB, 1987]--to say nothing of R-rated, Touchstone/Hollywood/Dimension/Miramax titles, most-or-all from Disney's backlot)...as well as animated! Again, the animated episodes of "Clerks"--which went almost straight-to-video (after ABC quickly "yanked" them off, in 2001)--confirmed my concerns (as a college junior, in early 1986) that "Down & Out in Beverly Hills" m-i-g-h-t lead to R-rated c-a-r-t-o-o-n-s from Disney...only with one of its four "divisions'" logos. ALL such titles---like all other, R-rated fare---elem. schoolers & kindergarteners can e-a-s-i-l-y rent or purchase...after-school, weekends, & holidays alike. Or they can easily watch such High Art, if Mommy & Daddy have purchased premium-pay-cable. THANK YOU ALL for putting up with a communitarian (Christian, but fiscally-liberal & human-rights-liberal) hillbilly's opinions! P-l-e-a-s-e, somebody give me Lexi Bunny's address--somebody pleeeze give me Jenny XJ-9's address, too--'cause I gotta date 'em BOTH!
Michael Shepherd Studio (not verified) | Tue, 10/18/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink
It is interesting to see that some of the responses indicate that there was a political bent to this piece. Everyone is certainly entitled to decide whether too much was read into the correlation between Jones' cartoons and Cold War conflicts; I like to throw "think pieces" out there for discussion. However, there is nothing political to be checked at the door. The piece is historical and none of my own political views are expressed. Also, there is no indication in the column that I considered Iraq to be either a success or a failure; that is for ongoing events and history to decide. What I did say was that the style and strategy of warfare seemed to be similar to that contained in Jones' Road-Runner cartoons. I'm sure that someone who is politically inclined could take that interpretation even further, but it won't be me.
Martin Goodman (not verified) | Tue, 10/18/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink
This is reading WAY too much into work that was created for fun entertainment. Leave politics at the door just enjoy the animation!
Ryan Oz (not verified) | Tue, 10/18/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink
I agree that what is going on in a society has an effect on an artist and is further influenced by the artist's own personal belief system. He may have seen it as a general expression of fanaticism, something he may have felt strongly about on a personal level. Censorship certainly has a fanatical element; influences such as McCarthyism and now the Religious Right come to mind. Censorship is certainly a palpable issue to anyone creating cartoons.
Pam Gill (not verified) | Mon, 10/17/2005 - 00:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.