Dr. Toon: Duck and Cover-Up

Dr. Toon recounts how terrifying a toon can be when one is young and impressionable, as he harkens back to when he first saw Duck and Cover, now ensconced in the Library of Congress’ National Film Registry.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld | Columns: Dr. Toon

For a long time, there were recurring nightmares. I had seen a TV documentary on atomic bombs and radiation. Some scientist mentioned that fish caught near nuclear test sites proved to be so radioactive that, when placed on x-ray plates, they literally took their own pictures. In my dreams, a ghostly, skeletal turtle slowly swam around in a tank of weird-looking fluid. I would watch it in horror until it swung around to look me directly in the face. My screams woke the household.

Twenty years later, President Reagan and the Soviets tossed bellicose statements back and forth across the seas during the final stages of the Cold War. This time the populace reacted with rage as well as trepidation. Anti-nuke protesters took to the streets; books, TV shows and movies decried nuclear war. Learned authors such as Jonathan Schell jostled with semi-learned celebrities for attention. One representative film, The Atomic Café (1983), featured Bert the Turtle along with considerable footage from Duck and Cover. The makers of this documentary intercut Duck and Cover with films of actual nuclear explosions and the spectacular carnage that resulted.

It was clear that survival was simply not possible. The message we knew even as children was made explicit — Civil Defense was kidding no one. Their true agenda may have been the avoidance of panic, and reassurance that life could, and would, go on. Perhaps our government simply wished to inure us to the idea that radioactive slugfests were inevitable.

In the end, we are no safer now than we were when Bert was just a sketch on a storyboard. Ultimate destruction is still possible. The difference is the bombs are bigger, the club has more members and some of the latest aspirants are dedicated fanatics. Unless we dedicate ourselves to changing it, such is the world we must now accept. Still, I have to ask — why did it have to be a toon, a perversion of all that is innocent and fun about being a kid, who first riveted those dire facts into my head? I don’t care if you are in the National Film Registry, Bert. You lied to me with a smile, and I hate you to this day. If you must duck and cover, do so out of shame; a hundred megatons is too good for you.

Martin “Dr. Toon” Goodman is a longtime student and fan of animation. He lives in Anderson, Indiana.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 







Comments


Some scant memories from the atomic scare of the 1950s are still left in my brain. Born in 1951, I was relatively sheltered from the horrors the grown-ups saw in the papers and newsreels. (TV wasn't very common in Finnish households back then, but being next-door neighbor to the Soviet Union certainly didn't ease their worries.) Two things come to mind: During a Sunday walk in the woods in our suburb in the late 50s, whenever we had walked a few hundred feet more, I asked my dad: "If an atomic bomb would detonate downtown, how loud would the bang be here"... The other thing was a recurring nightmare: I was about to set off an A-bomb myself (!), in a desert of all places, and had just lit the fuse (yes, cartoon type!), and when I was trying to run away, my feet were stuck in ther sand. I usually woke up with my feet entangled in the sheets. I've been a cartoon fan all my life - now, I make my living doing animation and special effects. But I remember with fondness the cartoons that were a part of our family's Sunday outings, we usually went to a "non-stop" movie theater, where they were playing newsreels and cartoons. I don't think "Duck & Cover" was ever shown here in Finland, but I do think some of the US newsreels that were shown must have contributed to the anxiety.
J-E Nystrom (not verified) | Tue, 03/14/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
My memory of Bert is quite different. I grew up in the same time period and recall the film and the duck and cover drills, but I don't recall taking them seriously. I grew up in our nation's capitol and believed that the evil empire didn't have the ability to deliver a surprise attack. Even if they did try our military might would triumph. We were not well informed and while there was a period when we didn't dring milk due to fallout from atomic testing, we didn't put two and two together. By the late '70s used copies of the film were being show as camp humor where I was now living, San Francisco. I showned it strictly for laughs at an experimental/counter-culture theater I was part of. Audiences laughed at Bert and sang along, but the live action part of the film was a bore (unfortunatly that is at least 90% of the film)so I didn't book it a second time. In the early '80s, when the documentary feature Atomic Cafe included clips of Bert, he became a camp hero of sorts. For some strange reason this silly turtle that I never took seriously will not fade away. While the film is a good example of poorly made propaganda (very low budget as Dr. Toon points out) I see no reason why the Library of Congress needed to add it to their list of important film acomplishments. I know there was a letter campaign to get the film on the list of great American films. The organizers did do some excellent research into the films history, but they never explained why it is an important milestone. I feel that by including it the value of the Library of Congress' list is somehow cheapened. Today I see Duck and Cover as a pathetic attempt to "educate" and, since it scared young Dr Toon, to scare some of our nation's youth. There are much better Cold War propaganda cartoons including five or six big budget gems by Sutherland Productions in Hollywood (Destination Earth, Meet King Joe and others). Too bad one of them didn't make the list instead.
Karl Cohen (not verified) | Tue, 03/14/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
You also forgot to mention that a spoof on Duck and Cover was included in a scene from Brad Bird's The Iron Giant, which was obviously not a praiseful one. :)
Andrew Kaiko (not verified) | Tue, 03/07/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.