Dr. Toon: Duck and Cover-Up

Dr. Toon recounts how terrifying a toon can be when one is young and impressionable, as he harkens back to when he first saw Duck and Cover, now ensconced in the Library of Congress’ National Film Registry.
Posted In | Magazines: AnimationWorld | Columns: Dr. Toon

Live-action for Duck and Cover was shot at PS 152 in Astoria Queens and nearby areas in November. The crew captured the entire footage on a single 35mm silent camera. A monkey replaced Bert’s nemesis, the skunk. Anthony Rizzo directed, with narration provided by Robert Middleton, and Carl Ritchey spoke Bert’s only line. The songwriting team of Carr and Corday, specialists in commercial jingles, composed Bert’s merry theme:

There was a turtle by the name of Bert
And Bert the Turtle was very alert
When danger threatened him, he never got hurt
He knew just what to do!
He’d duck, and cover,
Duck, and cover…

On Dec. 1, 1951, the FDCA prepared 300,000 Bert the turtle booklets for distribution to schools. Seventeen days later, there was an advance screening of Duck and Cover held in Washington. When February of 1952 arrived, Bert was already a star, posing (as a cardboard cutout) with seven year-old Mia Farrow. It was not until March that any schoolchildren actually viewed the film. Duck and Cover, a film produced for less than $20,000, received accolades from most… but not from all. By May of 1952, the Levittown Education Assoc. reported countless complaints from parents. Some children who saw Duck and Cover were beset with nightmares about bright lights, nuclear attacks and fantasies of death and doom.

I know. I was one of those kids.

In July of 1959, the Office of Civil Defense declared Duck and Cover obsolete. The OCD was, in truth, seven years too late. If one read in between the lines of the official pronouncement, one could see the shadow of the hydrogen bomb. The U.S. first exploded one on Eniwetok on November 1, 1952, and the Soviets successfully tested theirs on August 12 the next year. This weapon was at least 150 times more powerful than the bomb that atomized Hiroshima. No turtle, however prepared, could survive such a blast. Bert would be broiled in his shell a nanosecond before being reduced to his basic molecules, borne high and fast on a nuclear monsoon of fallout and radiation. The same for anything he was ducking and covering behind.

I hated Bert the Turtle in part for frightening me. I have to admit that some of the cheesy science-fiction movies I watched on our tiny black-and-white TV occasionally attained the same result. However, there was a difference. Caltiki, the Crab Monsters and the Fiend Without a Face were just scary monsters; despite his harmless appearance, Bert was far, far worse. He was a damned liar, and even when most of the kids in my class knew he was lying, he continued to spout his dishonest prevarications and his mendacious jingle in the face of our fear. We can live through a nuclear attack, or so Bert said. When you see the atomic flash, just duck and cover. Bert never said a thing about dying in nuclear agony, even though it was by far the greater possibility.

I was still too young to be in school when Duck and Cover was in use, and I was only a tot when the film was deemed obsolete. However, I was in class during the terrible days of the Cuban missile crisis, a tension-wracked time when President Kennedy and Soviet Premier Khrushchev pushed their hydrogen-powered chips to the center of the table. I remember my young female teacher breaking down in front of the class before our shocked and unbelieving eyes; some of the small girls wept in fear when this happened. Civil Defense had us all on alert constantly during that fateful week, and someone remembered that our school had a copy of Duck and Cover sitting on some shelf. It is very possible that no one even knew it had been outdated. So, for the first time, I was introduced to the most terrifying cartoon character I would ever see.







Comments


Some scant memories from the atomic scare of the 1950s are still left in my brain. Born in 1951, I was relatively sheltered from the horrors the grown-ups saw in the papers and newsreels. (TV wasn't very common in Finnish households back then, but being next-door neighbor to the Soviet Union certainly didn't ease their worries.) Two things come to mind: During a Sunday walk in the woods in our suburb in the late 50s, whenever we had walked a few hundred feet more, I asked my dad: "If an atomic bomb would detonate downtown, how loud would the bang be here"... The other thing was a recurring nightmare: I was about to set off an A-bomb myself (!), in a desert of all places, and had just lit the fuse (yes, cartoon type!), and when I was trying to run away, my feet were stuck in ther sand. I usually woke up with my feet entangled in the sheets. I've been a cartoon fan all my life - now, I make my living doing animation and special effects. But I remember with fondness the cartoons that were a part of our family's Sunday outings, we usually went to a "non-stop" movie theater, where they were playing newsreels and cartoons. I don't think "Duck & Cover" was ever shown here in Finland, but I do think some of the US newsreels that were shown must have contributed to the anxiety.
J-E Nystrom (not verified) | Tue, 03/14/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
My memory of Bert is quite different. I grew up in the same time period and recall the film and the duck and cover drills, but I don't recall taking them seriously. I grew up in our nation's capitol and believed that the evil empire didn't have the ability to deliver a surprise attack. Even if they did try our military might would triumph. We were not well informed and while there was a period when we didn't dring milk due to fallout from atomic testing, we didn't put two and two together. By the late '70s used copies of the film were being show as camp humor where I was now living, San Francisco. I showned it strictly for laughs at an experimental/counter-culture theater I was part of. Audiences laughed at Bert and sang along, but the live action part of the film was a bore (unfortunatly that is at least 90% of the film)so I didn't book it a second time. In the early '80s, when the documentary feature Atomic Cafe included clips of Bert, he became a camp hero of sorts. For some strange reason this silly turtle that I never took seriously will not fade away. While the film is a good example of poorly made propaganda (very low budget as Dr. Toon points out) I see no reason why the Library of Congress needed to add it to their list of important film acomplishments. I know there was a letter campaign to get the film on the list of great American films. The organizers did do some excellent research into the films history, but they never explained why it is an important milestone. I feel that by including it the value of the Library of Congress' list is somehow cheapened. Today I see Duck and Cover as a pathetic attempt to "educate" and, since it scared young Dr Toon, to scare some of our nation's youth. There are much better Cold War propaganda cartoons including five or six big budget gems by Sutherland Productions in Hollywood (Destination Earth, Meet King Joe and others). Too bad one of them didn't make the list instead.
Karl Cohen (not verified) | Tue, 03/14/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink
You also forgot to mention that a spoof on Duck and Cover was included in a scene from Brad Bird's The Iron Giant, which was obviously not a praiseful one. :)
Andrew Kaiko (not verified) | Tue, 03/07/2006 - 01:00 | Permalink

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.