Resurrecting The Thing

From the outset The Thing was intended to recreate as much of the look of John Carpenter's iconic version, but, at the same time, director Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. wanted to take advantage of the latest digital technology to push it further. Jesper Kjolsrud of Image Engine was the production visual effects supervisor and he figured out the best approach to blend practical with CG methods.
"One of the first things that came up was that there was obviously going to be a lot of burning things," Kjolsrud says. "And Matthijs wanted real convincing fire, so the approach was very much to try and film as much as we could practically, and augment it to what we need to do in post. So with the fire, for example, you can create really nice looking flames now with fluid sims. But it's very hard to light the sims. But if you have real fire, you can get anything you ask for. So you have stunt men on fire running through the scene, and if we want to animate differently in the flames, we could use a mixture of elements and CG fire that dynamically behaves we've animated it. But at the same time, we have a flame that is lit with a real fire and I think that was a very good approach."

Obviously this was a far cry from Image Engine's crustacean alien from District 9. For that they had one creature with multiple versions. But the challenge here involved multiple creatures and a transformation but similarly done in Maya and rendered in 3delight. "And the transforming bit is really what we started looking at," Kjolsrud continues. "Right from the beginning we started to break things down into smaller and smaller bits, trying to figure out each of those smaller parts. And once we had the footage, we broken it down into shots as well. But, technically, we would throw anything at it, including cloth sims, even for skin. And for the transformations we would draw from human to almost an upside down spider with tentacles coming out of the chest.























this movire definetley has it's moments, the effects sequences were actually pretty outstanding. There are some amazing bits of pure chaos and horror with the transformations and I defintley want to see it again. There were so many negative comments and such a build up to it prior to it's release that it was hard to focus on how to enjoy it, so I saw it for a second time a few days later and I REALLY enjoyed it then
Agreed. The blend of CGI and practical effects was outstanding. Yes, there were complaints but guess what? This isn't 1982. No film today ever does everything practical. People need to just get over the anti-CGI bias.
The CGI in The Thing was quite impressive. It blended seamlessly with the live action and practical effects.
It's a great accomplishment to make CGI look as organic as it did here.
Post new comment