DreamWorks Animation Goes Fine Art
"Kirk Sanders, one of our Utah artists, has done one called Madagascar Penguin Air. It gives you the feel of the film but is more like a vintage travel poster with Skipper, Kowalski, Rico and Private.
"David Bird, another one of our Utah artists, does stain glass, so he has a piece called Ginger Bread Man, and has put stained glass pieces of Gingy on an actual cookie sheet and has framed it with a Shrek emblem. It retails for $1,500 and it's a unique, mixed-media approach."

Maggie Parr, who lives in LA, was the youngest show designer for Walt Disney Imagineering, and has developed an international following for murals, portraits, illustrations and architectural and industrial design. "There's something so perfectly funny and ironic about taking cartoon characters and dropping them into serious fine art," she suggests.
"The unexpected contrast makes me laugh; and yet it's a perfect fit for the DreamWorks characters, which already have so much personality. I also like figuring out how they might look rendered in a different medium or setting. The Kung Fu Panda characters were fairly easy -- they're already three dimensional, and the show's creators developed some wonderful graphic visuals for the film. For those renderings, I referenced historical Chinese narrative paintings for style, and featured the characters in central, heroic poses. The Shrek piece was interesting -- I tried to depict Shrek and Fiona in a more medieval style painting, using a slightly lopsided perspective and painting in oil.
"But the best part is the characters. They really come to life while I paint them. Panda is hilarious -- he's one of my favorite DreamWorks characters. There's something about the process of portrait painting that brings the spirit of the subject out, even if the subject is imaginary. I'm not saying that Panda actually talked to me from the painting -- but I must say I felt the kung fu power while I worked! I still paint portraits using toil and acrylic. So much of my commercial work involves digital mediums that I prefer to spend my own creative time at the easel instead of the computer. It's very satisfying to put brush to canvas; and the end result is so lush and luminous. "
Scott Sherman, who lives in Oregon and has worked for Disney, Warner Bros. and Universal, says, "I've always loved these characters so it was a lot of fun to visualize new scenes for them and create visual artwork based on that. I developed probably about 20-30 concepts and they picked three of them. I did a series of reinterpreting for classic paintings (and movies) like Fiona for the Mona Lisa making it the Mona Fiona. They weren't selected at this time but I mainly worked on these DreamWorks characters using my oil painting style, even though they were done as digital pieces. I generally work on the computer the same way I work with traditional media, so I've developed an oil painting style that matches my actual oil painting style and I use that to interpret the DreamWorks characters for the three pieces that I did: King Julian XIII, Puss N' Donkey and Defending the Gates.
"My favorite character is King Julian, but in terms of painting, my favorite is the Kung Fu Panda. I really like the way the color and the lighting and the feeling of it came out. In all the cases, I was trying to find something that was really iconic of the characters and their roles in the films."
With stereoscopic 3-D all the rage, particularly at DreamWorks, Sanders says we should look for 3-D interpretive art in the future.
But Parr says she's looking forward to Megamind and that "it might be fun to do a serious staged portrait of the hero and villain, rendered in oil. And since I love cats so much, I might do a painting of Puss in Boots -- he's hard to resist."
Bill Desowitz is senior editor of AWN & VFXWorld.
























Ch-Ching! Just another soulless way for Dreamworks to cash in and make a Buck. I love how its not even Dreamworks artists that produce the work. They farmed it out! Classic.
I feel like all these exhibits and presenting this as the studio simply appreciating the creative thought they've put into the projects is disingenuous. This all seems like advertising, and Dreamworks trying to convince people that they do have a critical concern for what goes in their movies, while their history sort of points in the opposite direction (both in the movies and Jeffrey Katzenbergs rumored behavior in his early relationship with Pixar, and the shareholder suit that was filed in 2005 against Dreamworks about Shrek 2 DVD sales, etc).
I don't really trust Dreamworks, probably because of those things, and how this seems so much like a cynical approach to more securing more revenue and credibility after they noticed how Pixar presented their production artwork.
Who cares how much each of these pieces costs.
At least they're trying I suppose, but it's hard to get away from the fact that it was founded to make money by selling merchandise, not because they care.
I really like to read about animation work and i will love to watch it
Post new comment