The Adverse Effects of Cartoons on the Minds of our Children


Opinions and idea expressed in this article do not represent the opinions of AWN Inc., its staff or its affiliates.

In light of the recent Super Bowl debacle, the harmful effects of media on children have once again become a hot topic in this country. One of society's most important and sacred responsibilities is to mold the future leaders of the U.S. during their impressionable years. Janet Jackson's breast baring has awoken America and moved legislators to remove lurid material from radio and TV. I recently testified in front of the House of Representatives to push for increased fines against broadcasters that air and performances that contain unsuitable content.

However, what the mainstream press is not discussing is the adverse effects of animation on children. Kid friendly channels like Cartoon Network are no longer safe with its "adult" programming. Like the use of the cartoon character Joe Camel, children and their parents see cartoons and think safe product. But as we have learned that it’s harmful to give cigarettes to six-year-olds, we need to address the dangerous effects of Space Ghost and Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law on our children as well.

Cartoon related injuries are a serious topic that America has been avoiding for years. Dozen of our children each year fall prey to being over stimulated by crazed and/or super-powered characters. How many times will children be hurt under the guise of "having fun?" It is a note to AWN's balanced coverage of the animation community that it is willing to publish my case study on the adverse effects that cartoons have had on our youth. What you read may be disturbing, but as a concerned parent, grandparent or court appointed guardian, this article is a must read. Afterwards, hopefully each of you will join my call to ban all harmful cartoons.

The first reported "toon-related" incident occurred in 1914, when a 9-year-old upstate New York boy fell from his pony while pretending to be Winsor McCay atop Gertie the Dinosaur. The prep school student was already an experienced rider, but was distracted during a routine trot by fanciful thoughts of bare-backing a brontosaurus. After the release of Steamboat Willie in 1928, the number of cases of toon-related injuries skyrocketed. Strangely enough one of the most publicized "Willie ward" cases -- as the hospitals use to call them – was from the same upstate New York town that the aforementioned Gertie fiasco occurred. Many scholars in the field of toon-agedies have looked into the susceptibility of the New England states to toon-related occurrences. Some have linked it to harmful levels of cod in the groundwater, but others feel it's simply due to the region's loose liberal attitudes.

In the fall of 1928, young Dickie Johnson decided to take the family yacht for a spin around the lake. Unfortunately, the small boy was not yet an accomplished sea-fairing captain and he crashed the family heirloom into the dock, ruining his sister’s otherwise splendid cotillion.

This incident spurred the first toon-related injury lawsuit. Dickie's father, Gaylord Johnson, filed the case against Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks on charges of corrupting a minor and inciting mischief. When Dickie took the stand in the summer of 1929, he told the jury, "I thought if a lowly, common mouse could drive a boat, surely I could too."

In other damning testimony, the boy's mother, Mrs. Virginia Johnson said, "After seeing that crazed mouse in the theater, Dickie became a hellion. He just wouldn't stop tormenting the cat. He even fashioned his father’s ascots into a nest!" Disney, not one to flinch from adversity, stood his ground. The case is officially still on the books. Luckily, after a short institutional stay, young Johnson grew out of his Mickey Mouse fixation and ended up founding the hugely successful Orkin Extermination franchise.







Comments


ok its true

indeed it is true that cartoons have scenes which are not supposed to be seen by children, but still there are good cartoons too. as far as violence is concerned it is indeed the job of parents to guide their child, to tell them the difference in reality and fiction. although the mentality of a child is not as eligible as an adult but still he or she is not dumb enough to listen to the advice given to him her. as far as cartoons are concerned anime has taken this to a new level for which whether the channel is safe or not parental guidance has to be shown. it has become necessary for the present day.

nova (not verified) | Thu, 09/24/2009 - 02:06

Aha! that was great! ...

Aha! that was great! the sad thing is...although it was a joke, some parents actually feel that way about cartoons
Angelique Savoy (not verified) | Thu, 04/30/2009 - 23:00

Considering the time frame in which the adult bloc is aired...

Considering the time frame in which the adult bloc is aired on Cartoon Network(11PM-2AM) I would highly doubt any responsible parent would let their children be watching television or even be anywhere but in bed. I dearly hope this artical was not implying that all cartoons are "bad". Perhaps he should move to a theocratic dictatorship such as Iran where you don't have to worry about what's on TV, because you don't have one.
Alfred Fletcher (not verified) | Wed, 04/07/2004 - 23:00

Yes, very funny. At first while I was reading this the...

Yes, very funny. At first while I was reading this the pressure was raging and I was ready to post a comment on how completely ignorant, narrow minded, and deluded this guy was. But after the third page I realized all these examples were hilarious cases of people wanting to blame other sources for lack of good parenting. Can you say Clockwork Orange cartoon style. The author could've played the Cable Guy. Although the dead giveaway was the Credits. The name was ridulous enough, but a professor at NJ online university was amazing. Yeah, I'm the dean of the Philly Onlinemedical School. Hahahahah
Andrea B (not verified) | Wed, 04/07/2004 - 23:00

While it is true that content should be monitored, that...

While it is true that content should be monitored, that doesn't mean to hinder on the work of artists. It is clear that some have control issues and try to limit and control what other people do. There's a nob on every tv, it's an on/off switch. Use it. It pisses me off when my choices get taken away by some nazi with a fancy degree. It is the parent's duty to take care of their children, and for the entertainer to entertain. It's not the fault of the artist that there are dumb people who can't tell fantasy from reality. Should we take entertainment to the lowest common denominator to make it idiot proof?? How is that entertaining to others that have more than two brain cells? So Janet's boob was on tv, no one died as far as I know. I can see how many, many parents may have felt embarrased while watching the show with the kids on the room. They'll get over it. Violent cartoons have been around forever, you don't see crowds of people going out in a rampage with a malet chasing others.
Carlos Arancibia (not verified) | Tue, 04/06/2004 - 23:00
remi (not verified) | Sun, 04/04/2004 - 23:00

Humans have long been adept at passing the blame for thier...

Humans have long been adept at passing the blame for thier misdeeds. Poor parenting, mental illness, and the simple mistakes made by the formative minds of children are all valid reasons for the unfourtunate injuries and mishaps outlined in this article. The existence of cartoons is not. This is but the soapbox of a sociologist that sells books and seminars to simple minded masses that like to have thier ears tickled with the notion that all of societiy's ills can be cure with a quick-fix. We no longer need to be responsible parents that are involved in what our children are exposed to, we no longer need to curb alarming behavior with discipline, and we no longer need to admit to ourselves that our loved ones need to be treated when the symptoms of mental illness become apparent. Simply rid the world of cartoons- and all of society's ills will evaporate! Snake oil! Yes, some kind of limit should be placed on the content that is publicly avialable on television, and could be accidentally viewed by children- but such measures are already in place in the US. More adult-orented cartoons are played late at night, and are continually prefaced with parental warnings that alert viewers of the show's potentially frightening or inappropriate content. Cartoon network has been very responsable in this regard. I personally do not want to live in a country that becomes the kind of totalitarian, thought-controlling place that the author is clearly visualizing. I am content to let that kind of distopian horror exisit only in science fiction books. Also, I am shocked at the ignorance of this author, who had the audacity to post his political platform on a site frequented by the very people who make their living making that which he proposes to ban. What brilliance! Perhaps his writing was so sweeping that we would all be moved to tears and put aside our artistic visions- our ink and paper (or computers), for good, honest factory jobs. Fourtunately, this author's writings will soon vanish into historical obscurity, while cartoons will continue to be remembered (and beloved) for many, many years.
Camden Bayer (not verified) | Sun, 04/04/2004 - 00:00

Dr. Saturnine you are a fear monger and this has to be a...

Dr. Saturnine you are a fear monger and this has to be a April fool's joke? I can not believe Dr. Saturnine's article, which I find to be very comical. Sir you need to find a different cause to fight. As a freethinking democratic society I find these isolated incidents to be tragic for the victims involved. But to place blame on 2d or 3d created characters and not the children's parents is irresponsible. The whole adult swim block on Cartoon Network is geared towards let me guess...ADULTS. If parents let their kids watch shows that eat away their minds, it's the parents’ fault. With so many choices out there you can't complain about children's programming. It's ashame when kid shows are more diverse then adult shows. The group you represent and others like it, need to fight for free medical care or other political agendas.
Steven Sanders (not verified) | Sun, 04/04/2004 - 00:00

Thanks for the disturbing April Fools joke. Unfortunately,...

Thanks for the disturbing April Fools joke. Unfortunately, it isn’t that far off the mark from the way many people think. For more insight into this subject, I highly recommend a book called “Killing Monsters” by Gerald Jones. The author proclaims that violent entertainment is good for kids and demonizing it can do great harm to their emotional development. Jones debunks studies linking violent media with violence in society and argues that children clearly understand the difference between pretend and reality. He argues that violent video games, movies, music and comics provide a safe fantasy world within which children learn to become familiar with and control the frightening emotions of anger, violence and sexuality. Jones’s book offers a fresh, insightful, and interesting perspective that tends to be missing in the ongoing debate over the effects of media violence.
Doug Whaley (not verified) | Sat, 04/03/2004 - 00:00

hee hee! brilliant piece of april foolery, ye old fart! had...

hee hee! brilliant piece of april foolery, ye old fart! had me going from the outset, til i realized, at the bottom of page one, tis but a bit o'tongue-in-cheek blather! heh heh! i put it up there right after orson welles' radio presentation of 'the war of the worlds' on hallowe'en night so many years ago! grats on such a fine pseudo-article! ha ha ha!
tony saliste (not verified) | Fri, 04/02/2004 - 00:00

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Elsewhere on AWN